HypocrisyWatchman

24.2K posts

HypocrisyWatchman banner
HypocrisyWatchman

HypocrisyWatchman

@HypocrisyWatchm

Free speech. America First. Beware of foreign influence.

Michigan, USA Katılım Mart 2017
698 Takip Edilen340 Takipçiler
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
MJTruthUltra
MJTruthUltra@MJTruthUltra·
🚨 Democrat Senator Harry Reid introduced legislation in 1993 to end Birthright Citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. "No sane country would do that — No sane country would give illegals citizenship" “If you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. Citizenship and a guarantee to have full access to all public and social services this society provides.” rumble.com/v77yymm-1993-d…
English
670
13.1K
28.6K
500.8K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
MAZE
MAZE@mazemoore·
1993. Dianne Feinstein: Should people be able to come to this country, get on Medicaid, give birth to a baby, and then go back to their home country? The answer is no.
English
254
6.6K
19.1K
364.4K
HypocrisyWatchman
HypocrisyWatchman@HypocrisyWatchm·
@MsMelChen @romanhelmetguy Do we audit where the 2% spending goes? We do not. Look at the state of the UK fleet. They've found a way to spend the money on migrants and DEI programs, yet still placate the US.
English
0
0
0
8
Melissa Chen
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen·
Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025. But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it. Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions. Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are. Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale. Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is. Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.” If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about? Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy. Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades. They couldn’t even manage that. So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates. If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.
English
1.3K
2.5K
11.8K
1.3M
Lauren Chen
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen·
Assuming these people were at the restaurant for 2 hours A $60 tip means this server made $30/hour off this ONE TABLE Is that not enough for a waiter to make? Does being a waiter really need to be a $150/hour job? The entitlement behind a lot of tipping culture is insane
NRM84@Mappy6984

Thoughts

English
1.2K
201
6.4K
1.2M
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
9mmSMG
9mmSMG@9mmsmg·
The broader application of birthright citizenship is so incredibly insane that even Europe doesn't allow it. Anyone, from anywhere in world can travel here, legally or illegally and pop out a baby and that baby is now a citizen of the USA. A pregnsnt Honduran woman can crawl across the border after her water broke, diving onto American soil like it's in the end zone in the Super Bowl and that baby is now a citizen. A pregnant Indian woman on vacation can give birth inside Epcot and that baby is now a citizen. It is the most ludicrous policy in the world. Everyone knows it, the people who disagree know it, they just want it. I can't believe this hinges on Amy Coney Barrett. If we lose this, we have no chance of ever fixing America.
English
105
628
4.7K
209.7K
HypocrisyWatchman
HypocrisyWatchman@HypocrisyWatchm·
@hanglojapan If the American press is smearing her as right wing, what did she do to upset them?
English
0
0
0
5
反グロ🇯🇵
反グロ🇯🇵@hanglojapan·
私のフィードに流れてくるアメリカ人のポストを見ていると日本の総理大臣高市早苗をナショナリストだと勘違いしてる人が多いことにビックリしている あきらかにアメリカのメディアの情報操作だとよくわかった📺 高市総理はグローバリストであり、移民を止めるどころか推進している そしてLGBTの理解増進法なども推進している 日本を海外に切り売りし、歴史ある日本の文化を破壊しようとしているのが日本の総理大臣だと知ってもらいたい
日本語
812
2.3K
11.4K
168.6K
The Redheaded libertarian
The Redheaded libertarian@TRHLofficial·
SCOTUS may rule that birthright citizenship is constitutional, using precedent and a loose interpretation of an earlier ruling, so we may need to approach the issue of one million Chinese communists voting in our elections in the future differently. As it holds, they can’t even be denaturalized. There would definitively and permanently be no solution and creating citizens of those who dilute our values is republic ending. What we can do now, is aggressively and publicly enforce FARA, the Espionage Act, and related statutes against anyone (citizen or not) acting under CCP direction. Prosecute espionage, influence ops, and undisclosed CCP ties. That’s really it though. If it’s ruled constitutional for anyone infiltrate and dismantle our republic, all we can do is try to disincentivize it. How utterly demoralizing.
English
378
660
4.5K
82.6K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Simon Vallée
Simon Vallée@sival84·
If you want to know what conservatives think, ask the smartest of them, for they are the ones able to rationalize the largely instinctive positions and traditionalism of conservatives. If you want to know what progressives think, ask the dumbest of them, because they're the ones who aren't smart enough to use ambiguous language to disguise what they really mean. Who don't care about plausible deniability and will tell you EXACTLY what they think and want.
Simon Vallée@sival84

Like Ibram X Kendi, she is not bright enough to know when to bend or be ambiguous enough to provide plausible deniability. She just reveals the progressive judicial mindset in its rawest form, uncaring for reason, consistency or logic, heavy on posturing, emotion and theatrics.

English
9
157
1.7K
52.8K
Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
It's actually not losing my "tether to reality" to notice that America keeps attacking European energy supplies, as it has now happened twice with no care or concern for the effect on our countries. America is going to lose Europe to protect Israel.
Aristonkle@ParanoidPol

A large segment of UK based influencers, in seeing the managed decline of their country, have shifted markedly to the right. That’s to be expected given the circumstances and the need for immigration reform there. But they’ve also lost their tether to reality and become indistinguishable from leftists when it comes to world events.

English
993
223
3.4K
182.3K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec·
Well well well Notice that the liberal justices suddenly refer to unborn babies as people with full rights when the subject changes from abortion to immigration Like magic
English
1.2K
25.4K
110K
1.1M
Zoe Gardner
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere·
The funny thing about the right wing approach of blaming feminism for low birth rate is it assumes young women have plenty of offers for serious committed relationships, marriage & families from eligible men, but they refuse these because feminism. Are you lot ok?😅
English
190
42
371
42.8K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
The purpose of a system is what it does: Israel is targeting the negotiators to ensure we can’t end the war & to ensure that the Iranian leaders who come next will be more extreme, thereby ensuring that the war goes on. The 1st step to end the war must be restraining Israel.
Joe Kent tweet media
English
1.5K
10.6K
40.2K
963K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Haywood Talcove
Haywood Talcove@HaywoodTalcove·
At one point, California had more people applying for unemployment than there were adults in the entire state. $32.6 billion. Gone. Prisoners collected. Dead people collected. I warned them. I begged them not to let the money go out like that. They suspended every rule anyway. The tools to stop this exist. So why are the doors still open? 30 years tracking fraud. This is the biggest in American history. It didn't have to happen. And it doesn't have to continue.nypost.com/2026/04/01/opi…
English
1.9K
14K
52K
49M
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Yogi
Yogi@Houseofyogi·
Ketanji Brown Jackson is unfit for the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is supposed to be the one institution in America that isn't a stage. Nine people. Lifetime appointments. No elections. No donors. No campaigns. Just the Constitution. Yesterday the Court ruled 8-1 that Colorado's ban on talk therapy violated the First Amendment. Six conservatives agreed. Both liberal justices agreed. Except Jackson. She wrote a 35-page dissent. Eight justices needed fewer pages to explain the law than she needed to explain why they were all wrong. And read it aloud from the bench. Turning the court into a spectacle. Then Kagan, Obama's appointee, publicly corrected her. Called the case "textbook" viewpoint discrimination. Accused Jackson of "reimagining and collapsing well-settled legal distinctions." Jackson fired back in a footnote. Accused Kagan and Sotomayor of being dupes for the conservative majority. A Supreme Court justice calling her own colleagues political pawns. In a legal opinion. From the bench that exists to be above politics. Every time she loses, she turns on whatever allies she has left. Three separate 8-1 rulings across three years. Lone dissenter every time. Barrett wrote that Jackson "decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary." She has two liberal allies sitting right next to her. They looked at her reasoning and chose the law over her activism. Last term, every justice on the Court agreed with the majority more often than she did. Dead last of nine. In contested cases: 51%. Kagan, same team: 70%. One builds coalitions. One writes 35-page letters to nobody. Majority opinions: 5. Fewest on the Court. Dissents: 10. Most on the Court. Words per oral argument: 1,350. Next closest justice: 900. She talks the most. Writes the longest. Wins the least. Before the Supreme Court she spent eight years on the DC District Court. More of her rulings were overturned than nearly two-thirds of her peers. Reversed unanimously for exceeding her jurisdiction. Tried to overrule Congress on immigration. The court above her said she had no authority. And that court leaned left. Six of ten judges appointed by Democrats. Even they thought she went too far. A judge is supposed to be consistent. States can't ban gender procedures for minors. States have ABSOLUTE power to ban talk therapy for minors. Same justice. Same year. The only variable is which side of the culture war the regulation falls on. A judge is supposed to be honest. Told law students in 2015 that critical race theory informs sentencing. Told the Senate in 2022 that CRT doesn't come up in her work as a judge. One of those was under oath. Can't define the word "woman" in front of the Senate. Celebrates being "the first Black woman" on the Supreme Court on The View. Under oath she's not a biologist. On daytime TV she's making history. A judge is supposed to protect the vulnerable. Federal sentencing guidelines called for 10 years in a child pornography case. She gave 3 months. Her sentencing averaged 57% below national for possession. 47% below for distribution. Every. Single. Case. Below guidelines. A judge is supposed to defend the Constitution. Not treat it as a document to be corrected. She praised the 1619 Project, which argues America's true founding wasn't liberty in 1776 but slavery in 1619. She wrote from the bench that "Our country has never been colorblind." Rejecting the plain meaning of the Equal Protection Clause. She accused the Court itself of enabling "our collective demise." "Let-them-eat-cake obliviousness." "Five-alarm fire." "Moneyed interests." These aren't legal opinions. These are campaign speeches from a chair that's supposed to be above campaigns. Harvard Law. A Supreme Court clerkship. Eight years on the federal bench. She told the Senate she doesn't have "a judicial philosophy per se." But she told the country she's "not afraid to use her voice." She's an activist. Weakest judge of the highest court. Biden had judges with more cases argued before the Court and bipartisan support. He passed over them for the nominee endorsed by Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, and Demand Justice. She doesn't want to be a justice. She wants to be a politician. She just skipped the election. I hope you understand what's at stake.
English
521
3.1K
15.2K
534.6K
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
The left’s argument for birthright citizenship is obviously insane but it’s even more insane when you consider that they actually don’t believe in your or my “birthright.” We are on stolen land and don’t belong here, according to them. But the anchor baby whose parents got here from Guatemala 10 seconds ago has a “birthright” and is tied to this nation by blood for all time. That’s actually their position. It’s so psychotic that you can’t even argue against it. Like trying to have a political debate with a dog. These people are not rational.
English
1.4K
11K
56.9K
951K
New York Post
New York Post@nypost·
‘Supergirl’ star Milly Alcock braces for backlash — as women face scrutiny for ‘simply existing’ in franchises trib.al/ttRcANd
New York Post tweet media
English
922
16
253
1.9M
HypocrisyWatchman
HypocrisyWatchman@HypocrisyWatchm·
@May_Roma Love it. Tattoos are a sign of low character for men, and mental illness for women.
English
0
0
0
5
HypocrisyWatchman retweetledi
Dan Hill
Dan Hill@dandinohill·
Chuck Schumer to a colleague: "I thought being in the opposition was going to be difficult. But I was wrong." - Sen Grassley allows our Democrat Senators to use "Blue Slips" to block President Trump's judicial appointments. - The Republicans run pro-forma sessions to block President Trump from making any recess appointments. - Thune and McConnell bottled up the SAVE America Act and all of the America First Legislation from the House - preventing it from being passed into law. "We didn't have to do much. Thune and the Republicans blocked themselves. Imagine that?"
English
127
1.6K
3.3K
37.3K