Igor Domsac

@davidgokhshtein @kurtwuckertjr if you want to hear about the untold history of Bitcoin. You won't regret!

Who would you like to see me talk to on my podcast next?

Pionero de Bitcoin @IDomsac lo ve claro "El Potencial de BSV es Enorme" en @CanalBitcoinSVe youtu.be/wCdFsFm_G5s?si…

Nueva entrevista en @CanalBitcoinSVe junto a Naka y Sato. Una conversación sobre BSV, escalabilidad, narrativa histórica y el rumbo que está tomando la industria. Llevo siguiendo este canal desde sus comienzos, así que participar en él fue todo un honor. youtu.be/wCdFsFm_G5s

Hay una idea que casi todo el mundo da por hecha: que nadie sabe quién creó Bitcoin. Pero cuando uno se detiene a revisar la cronología completa y los hechos que han ido apareciendo con los años, esa certeza empieza a perder solidez. #Bitcoin #SatoshiNakamoto #CraigWright

Bitcoin nació como efectivo P2P. Hoy se vende como «oro digital». En 2017 cambió todo. Mientras tanto, la versión que escala ya supera 1M tx/s. ¿Tecnología… o narrativa? #Bitcoin #BSV

Mi intervención ayer en Todo Bitcoin. La presentación de mi libro “El padre de Bitcoin“ escrito bajo pseudónimo y con empleo de la esteganografía en homenaje a Satoshi Nakamoto. Disponible en Amazon. Espero que os guste: youtu.be/M7hfqaebUSc?is…

BSV Browser is live. iOS: apps.apple.com/app/bsv-browse… Android: play.google.com/store/apps/det… It's a regular web browser — tabs, bookmarks, search — with a self-custodial BRC-100 wallet baked in. Source available: github.com/bsv-blockchain…

BTC Isn’t Winning. It’s Being Sold. Credit: @CsTominaga

HighCalvin Vulnerability Report Bitcoin’s critical failure is not cryptographic. It’s economic + coordination-based — and it does not require a 51% attack. 🧵👇 ⸻ 1/ This is not theoretical. It’s a fee-policy exploit. Quite literally, all miners can do it. They raise the minimum fee to 1 BTC / kB, continue mining blocks like nothing happened, and stall non-compliant transactions indefinitely. ⸻ 2/ While the network is effectively frozen for normal users, miners (or aligned entities): • Short BTC with max leverage • Cash out BTC already sitting on exchanges • Let panic + settlement delay do the rest Retail is locked. Insiders exit first 😂 ⸻ 3/ Key point: 👉 You do NOT need 51% hashrate. You only need to: • Convince enough miners to adopt the same fee floor • Share the excess fee rewards • Maintain coordination temporarily This is easier than a classic 51% attack. ⸻ 4/ Why this works: Bitcoin has no fee ceiling. Fees are “market-based,” but miners control inclusion. Fees don’t need to be infinite — only temporarily exclusionary, especially during volatility. That’s the attack surface. ⸻ 5/ Mechanics of the exploit: • Miners set absurd minimum fees (e.g. 1 BTC/kB) • Continue mining (even near-empty blocks) • Normal txs don’t clear • Settlement latency explodes • Price discovery moves off-chain This is a fee-based DoS, not a hash takeover. ⸻ 6/ What’s changed is scale. At ~$90k–$120k BTC (2025–2026): • Market cap ≈ $1.8–2T • Derivatives OI routinely $50–100B+ ⸻ 7/ Why multi-billion dollar damage is realistic: If coordinated actors short even 5–10% of open interest near local tops: • Forced settlement delays amplify panic • Retail can’t move • Liquidations cascade Losses easily reach billions — possibly tens of billions. ⸻ 8/ Important distinction: This does not break PoW. This does not violate consensus. It exploits: • Fee discretion • Miner coordination • Small block constraints • Off-chain markets settling faster than on-chain users Bitcoin works as deployed — that’s the problem. ⸻ 9/ Why block size matters: Small blocks (BTC): • Amplify fee pressure • Make stalling trivial Larger-block chains (e.g. BSV): • Allow honest miners to clear backlog • Reduce fee leverage • Lower coordination attack surface This is why block limits are not neutral. ⸻ 10/ Bottom line: Bitcoin’s failure mode is conditional permissionlessness. If you can be excluded when it matters most — during volatility, exits, or crisis — the system is not trustless. It’s discretionary. #BTC #BCH #BSV #Severe #vulnerability #CryptoNews #HighCalvin

Benki Ashaninka has an invitation for you! This great spiritual leader is at the forefront of the Yorenka Tasorentsi Institute, which represents the Council of Indigenous Spiritual Leaders of the Indigenous Ayahuasca Conference. ayahuasca2026.com

Get BSV in 1 min with $1 from your bank.

looking at the bsv derivatives data and something is completely broken on websea exchange open interest is sitting at $6.2 billion for context the entire market cap of bsv at $20 is barely $400 million that is 15x the total supply leverage. someone is naked shorting

My Christmas wish is that envy dies of boredom. 🎄 That people stop treating another person’s success as an insult delivered personally to their ego, and start treating it as a fact—sometimes inconvenient, often instructive, occasionally magnificent. Let the sight of someone with more stop triggering the little tribunal of bitterness. Let it trigger something rarer: appetite, discipline, ambition, and a clean, sober decision to improve. I want the new reflex to be this: look at the person ahead and say, well done. Not through clenched teeth, not with a moral footnote, not with the usual cowardly addendum about “privilege,” as though excellence must always be explained away before it is permitted to exist. Simply: well done. Then turn away from the gossip and the grievance and go to battle—not against them, but against one’s own laziness, one’s own excuses, one’s own fond attachment to comfort masquerading as principle. Because there is something indecent about resentment pretending to be virtue. It is the most common fraud of our age: the idea that tearing down is a form of justice, that sneering is a form of intelligence, that demanding less from oneself is somehow the same as caring more for others. It is not compassion; it is surrender, dressed up in righteous language and sent out to collect praise. No, the proper response to achievement is not sabotage. It is aspiration. To look at what another has accomplished and say, with genuine admiration, I could do some of that. Not by imitation, but by effort; not by whining, but by work; not by begging the world to be flatter and easier, but by becoming sharper. To strive for excellence—not because one wants to lord it over anyone, but because one has finally remembered the simple pleasure of competence, the dignity of building, the thrill of learning, the clean pride of doing something difficult well. That is the kind of inequality that should not be feared: the inequality between the person who tries and the person who sulks. So here’s the wish: fewer people acting like victims of other people’s victories, and more people acting like creators of their own. Fewer sermons about fairness that end in destruction. More quiet, relentless effort that ends in growth. Fewer eyes glued to the neighbour’s plate. More hands busy cooking a better meal. If Christmas means anything beyond glitter and sugar and public sentimentality, let it mean this: a renewed respect for excellence, and the courage to chase it.

We’re not heading toward a crisis. We’re already past the point of no return. What’s coming isn’t a crash — it’s a sorting event. For 20 years, we optimized for convenience. For 10 years, we optimized for engagement. Now we’re optimizing for control. AI didn’t break the system. It completed it. One stack. One feed. One identity layer. One permission slip for existence. This is the end-state of the Tenant economy: • You don’t own your audience • You don’t own your data • You don’t own your identity • You don’t even own your attention You rent reality. And here’s the part most people miss: This doesn’t end with revolution. It ends with compliance. Most people won’t fight the cage. They’ll upgrade it. Frictionless. Managed. Safe. A perfectly optimized life — curated by machines that know you better than you know yourself. That path already has a name. It’s comfortable. It’s popular. And it’s irreversible. But there’s another trajectory — quieter, harder, smaller. It doesn’t ask for permission. It doesn’t wait for consensus. It doesn’t try to “fix” the system. It routes around it. That path starts with one principle: If you don’t hold the keys, you don’t own anything. Not your money. Not your words. Not your history. Not yourself. The future splits here. On one side: Centralized AI, managed identities, narrative enforcement, infinite noise. On the other: Self-custody. Cryptographic identity. Direct value exchange. Small, high-trust networks. Not mass adoption. Selection. This is what Metanet is built for. Not another platform. Not another audience trap. Not another “Web3” casino. Metanet is infrastructure for people who already know the game is over — and want out before the snap. • Identity without permission • Value without middlemen • Truth anchored in proof, not feeds • Networks that scale sideways, not upward When the brittle systems break — and they will — the survivors won’t be the loudest. They’ll be the ones who already left. This isn’t about “winning the internet.” It’s about remaining human when the internet stops being real. No saviors are coming. No reforms are coming. No rollback is coming. There is only one move left: Build parallel. Build sovereign. Build now. Metanet isn’t the future. It’s the exit. And the door doesn’t stay open forever. GetMetanet.com MetanetAcademy.com MetanetApps.com Join.BSV.Chat MetanetMeetup.com iykyk

Point 1: Bitcoin was not “released on a cypherpunk mailing list.” The list where the white paper was announced included government officials, academics, cryptographers, and assorted practitioners. It was a professional, mixed audience. Get your facts straight. Point 2: “We.” That pronoun is standard academic usage in single-author technical papers. It’s not a clue, not a conspiracy, and not a mistake. It’s house style. Point 3: The system is a timestamp server first and foremost. Read the abstract. The entire construction exists to create an immutable, time-ordered ledger of transactions—digital cash anchored by time, not a cult commodity. Point 4: Adam Back’s Hashcash was a proof-of-work example, not Bitcoin’s design. Hashcash (and copies of it) were not used in Bitcoin as a drop-in component, nor were they aligned with the transaction model, incentives, or network rules of Bitcoin. Citing Hashcash as “what Bitcoin is” is lazy gloss. Point 5: “Permission.” No. The paper describes a public system where miners validate and build blocks and where users transact directly (IP-to-IP) using fresh addresses for small casual transactions and micropayments. That is not a blank cheque for spam, sybil theatre, or retrofitted custodial choke points. Point 6: If you had read the paper, you’d know the roles are defined: nodes (miners) create blocks; users spend; the timestamp chain orders and secures. It was built to scale usage, not to enshrine artificial scarcity or outsource everything to exchanges. You haven’t read the paper, have you.

@craigwrightai @CsTominaga $igordomsac

Bitcoin Doesn't Use Encryption Credit: @CsTominaga

14/ He escrito un artículo largo explicando esto sin jerga técnica. No va de «cripto» Va del futuro de Internet y de nuestros hijos. 👇 igordomsac.com/gran-error-bit…

13/ Por eso Bitcoin importa más que su precio. Importa porque permite elegir. Elegir pagar, hablar y crear sin permiso.

1/ Internet prometía libertad. Hoy depende de plataformas que controlan tus datos, tu dinero y tu identidad. Esto no pasó por accidente. 👇