IFP

4.6K posts

IFP banner
IFP

IFP

@IFP

A think tank for accelerating scientific, technological, and industrial progress. Follow our team: https://t.co/CC0MxWfh3X

Washington, D.C. Katılım Nisan 2013
46 Takip Edilen21.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
IFP
IFP@IFP·
Come help us build the frontier think tank in DC
Tim Fist@fiiiiiist

I’m hiring a Member of Technical Staff at IFP. Your job will be to build software that allows us to operate with the effective capacity of a think tank 10 times our size. If you care about reforming US policy, I think this is one of the highest leverage roles available: you’ll be directly amplifying the work of our extremely cracked and growing team of 35. Given how important this job is, we will pay a $5,000 reward for any referral that results in a hire. More on the role: I expect this will be a hard role to fill, for a few reasons: 1. You have to believe US policy is the most important lever for impact There are plenty of opportunities in the private sector for engineers to have a significant impact. But technical talent in public policy is far more neglected, and often much higher leverage. IFP’s mission is to reform US policy to drive breakthrough discoveries, attract top talent, and expand our nation’s capacity to build. We measure our efficacy by our counterfactual policy impact: whether we create good policy outcomes that would not have otherwise happened. The software you build will directly affect the rate at which we can do this. The work you help us do faster and better will be read in the Oval Office, will shape the direction of billions in federal $, and will directly influence geopolitical strategy. We need someone in this role who internalizes how important this is. 2. You have to want to deeply understand what effective policy work looks like Many tasks in policy research and advocacy are time-consuming but basic text-to-text translation tasks, like simplifying results from academic papers, summarizing public comments on new regulations, and recording information about contacts from meeting notes. This work is necessary to produce good policy outcomes, but laborious. One way to understand this role is by looking at the way progress in AI capabilities has shifted the job of a programmer away from writing code and more towards specifying requirements and verifying the work of AI agents. In this role, you’ll do the same for policy work, moving the focus of our team away from basic natural language manipulation tasks and towards strategy, deep research, and policy engagement. A crucial part of this work is identifying which parts of policy research and advocacy can be effectively automated with frontier models without compromising quality, and continually retooling to adapt to the latest state of the art. The ideal candidate is someone who cares about building tools that people love to use and who can work effectively with our policy teams to understand their goals, processes, and constraints. 3. You have to be able to build a wide variety of great software Your projects will vary widely, from building agent scaffolds to custom CRM tooling to deployment pipelines for maintainable, performant microsites (check out the full job description for more). The right person will have led the design and delivery of complex user-facing products across the full stack, know how to ship quickly while building maintainable tech, and understand the trade-offs inherent in your design choices. – This role is open to both remote work and people able to work out of our office in Washington, DC, with the latter being preferred. The salary range for this role is $165,000 to $245,000. Here’s the full JD and link to apply: ifp.org/opportunity/me… Applications close May 31st.

English
0
0
3
1.5K
IFP retweetledi
Tim Fist
Tim Fist@fiiiiiist·
I’m hiring a Member of Technical Staff at IFP. Your job will be to build software that allows us to operate with the effective capacity of a think tank 10 times our size. If you care about reforming US policy, I think this is one of the highest leverage roles available: you’ll be directly amplifying the work of our extremely cracked and growing team of 35. Given how important this job is, we will pay a $5,000 reward for any referral that results in a hire. More on the role: I expect this will be a hard role to fill, for a few reasons: 1. You have to believe US policy is the most important lever for impact There are plenty of opportunities in the private sector for engineers to have a significant impact. But technical talent in public policy is far more neglected, and often much higher leverage. IFP’s mission is to reform US policy to drive breakthrough discoveries, attract top talent, and expand our nation’s capacity to build. We measure our efficacy by our counterfactual policy impact: whether we create good policy outcomes that would not have otherwise happened. The software you build will directly affect the rate at which we can do this. The work you help us do faster and better will be read in the Oval Office, will shape the direction of billions in federal $, and will directly influence geopolitical strategy. We need someone in this role who internalizes how important this is. 2. You have to want to deeply understand what effective policy work looks like Many tasks in policy research and advocacy are time-consuming but basic text-to-text translation tasks, like simplifying results from academic papers, summarizing public comments on new regulations, and recording information about contacts from meeting notes. This work is necessary to produce good policy outcomes, but laborious. One way to understand this role is by looking at the way progress in AI capabilities has shifted the job of a programmer away from writing code and more towards specifying requirements and verifying the work of AI agents. In this role, you’ll do the same for policy work, moving the focus of our team away from basic natural language manipulation tasks and towards strategy, deep research, and policy engagement. A crucial part of this work is identifying which parts of policy research and advocacy can be effectively automated with frontier models without compromising quality, and continually retooling to adapt to the latest state of the art. The ideal candidate is someone who cares about building tools that people love to use and who can work effectively with our policy teams to understand their goals, processes, and constraints. 3. You have to be able to build a wide variety of great software Your projects will vary widely, from building agent scaffolds to custom CRM tooling to deployment pipelines for maintainable, performant microsites (check out the full job description for more). The right person will have led the design and delivery of complex user-facing products across the full stack, know how to ship quickly while building maintainable tech, and understand the trade-offs inherent in your design choices. – This role is open to both remote work and people able to work out of our office in Washington, DC, with the latter being preferred. The salary range for this role is $165,000 to $245,000. Here’s the full JD and link to apply: ifp.org/opportunity/me… Applications close May 31st.
Tim Fist tweet media
English
1
11
34
11.3K
IFP retweetledi
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Jensen Huang wants to sell more chips to China because that’s good for his business. But American compute should go to American labs. Strengthening export controls on AI chips and manufacturing equipment is a national security imperative to keep the US ahead of China.
Alec Stapp tweet media
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

Today, @BuchananBen and I co-author a piece in the New York Times with a simple message: While we disagree on plenty, we believe AI has national security implications which deserve a careful and bipartisan government response. We can (and should) have partisan fights about all manner of AI issues, but catastrophic risk from AI shouldn’t be one of them.

English
8
13
87
5.9K
IFP retweetledi
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Important piece in the NYT today from @deanwball & @BuchananBen. Mythos found zero-day vulnerabilities in every single browser and operating system, full stop. Imagine if China had reached that capability before we had the chance to patch our systems.
Alec Stapp tweet media
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

Today, @BuchananBen and I co-author a piece in the New York Times with a simple message: While we disagree on plenty, we believe AI has national security implications which deserve a careful and bipartisan government response. We can (and should) have partisan fights about all manner of AI issues, but catastrophic risk from AI shouldn’t be one of them.

English
3
11
98
8K
IFP retweetledi
Santi Ruiz
Santi Ruiz@rSanti97·
After a brief hiatus, we return to regular Statecraft programming. It's just what you asked for: Reviewing an out-of-print tract on Nixon's attempts to control the federal bureaucracy. statecraft.pub/p/what-trump-c…
English
0
4
36
6.6K
IFP retweetledi
Santi Ruiz
Santi Ruiz@rSanti97·
We should do this, and then adapt that wastewater testing infrastructure for pandemic preparedness.
Jennifer Jacobs@JenniferJJacobs

Scoop from @CBSNews: Trump admin is proposing wastewater testing on a national level to try to ferret out data on illegal drug use in real time, according to a draft of a new drug control strategy. The strategy also accuses pop culture of normalizing drug use, and says marketers of addictive substances -- including nicotine, alcohol, marijuana and psychedelics -- have adopted "strategies similar to Big Tobacco's historical targeting of young audiences." cbsnews.com/news/new-white…

English
4
7
89
10.4K
IFP retweetledi
Brian Potter
Brian Potter@_brianpotter·
The US consumes over 20 million barrels of oil each day. But it doesn't consume it directly. Oil refineries take raw crude and turn it into various products - gasoline, diesel, jet fuel - that we can use. This week, I look at how oil refineries work. construction-physics.com/p/how-an-oil-r…
Brian Potter tweet media
English
7
83
371
38.9K
IFP retweetledi
Jeremy Neufeld
Jeremy Neufeld@JeremyLNeufeld·
The H-1B system incentivizes an entire cottage industry of outsourcers. As Daniel points out, the administration could nuke the outsourcers and boost the value of the program overnight, with no change in the number of visas.
Jeremy Neufeld tweet media
Daniel Di Martino@DanielDiMartino

In my latest Substack post I explain why allocating visas based on a wage ranking is better than an auction. The Trump administration imposed a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas. Here, I explain the problems with the policy and how to fix the program.

English
10
28
138
22.4K
IFP retweetledi
Leah Libresco Sargeant
Leah Libresco Sargeant@LeahLibresco·
So much of our biosecurity infrastructure is built around assuming we will retain the moats / signals of suspicious activity we've relied on in the path. That is very, very unlikely. Biosecurity, not job loss, remains my expected cause of a strong AI backlash.
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp

It's been heartening to see US policymakers wake up to the cybersecurity risks posed by Mythos-level AI models. The next step is for them to start thinking about biosecurity threats. There's lots of debate around how much uplift current models provide relative to Google Search. But future models will undoubtedly increase access to bioweapons on a scale we're not remotely prepared for yet...

English
3
6
46
13.5K
IFP retweetledi
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
It's been heartening to see US policymakers wake up to the cybersecurity risks posed by Mythos-level AI models. The next step is for them to start thinking about biosecurity threats. There's lots of debate around how much uplift current models provide relative to Google Search. But future models will undoubtedly increase access to bioweapons on a scale we're not remotely prepared for yet...
Alec Stapp tweet media
Olivia H. Scharfman@OliviaHelenS

Not all labs will safety test like this. nytimes.com/2026/04/29/us/…

English
13
33
166
29.1K
IFP retweetledi
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
China processes over 90% of the world's rare earths. To counter that, the US recently signed a deal with MP Materials that includes a 10-year price floor, guaranteed purchases, preferred equity, and warrants for a 15% ownership stake. But there are some problems: 1. America's fiscal exposure is linked inversely to Chinese strategic actions. If China floods the market to depress prices, US price-floor payments go up. 2. And the whole deal depends on annual congressional appropriations that may or may not materialize. This is not a new problem. For the CHIPS Act, Congress gave the program $39 billion in flexible funding... and then used backdoor allocation authority to redirect $3.5 billion to a defense program, forcing renegotiations with companies mid-deal. Every US industrial policy commitment carries a political risk premium that competitors elsewhere don't face. New at Factory Settings, @ArnabDatta321 on what needs to change for industrial policy to actually work. factorysettings.org/p/policy-uncer…
Alec Stapp tweet media
English
13
28
125
14K
IFP retweetledi
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬@RuxandraTeslo·
Very kind of @DKThomp to mention my work on clinical trial reform on the @ezraklein show for @nytimes. There has never been a more important time to act in this direction, as advances in AI will make the clinical trial system even more of a bottleneck.
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 tweet media
English
4
19
104
18.2K
IFP retweetledi
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Excited to be chatting with @nanransohoff today on stage at Stripe Sessions. We'll chat about how why more founders should become "General Managers" for the most important problems (that aren't the right shape for a normal startup) and why philanthropy should back them. Highly recommend reading Nan's seminal essay on this topic: nanransohoff.substack.com/p/there-should…
Alec Stapp tweet media
English
5
13
101
16.2K