Ian

795.1K posts

Ian banner
Ian

Ian

@ISCOSEU

Adept, Abolitionist, hopeless romantic. Research on Potential Futures. Post/RP≠endorsement. Art: Dai Dudu, Li Tiezi, & Zhang An, Influential People

Old Europe Katılım Haziran 2011
5.9K Takip Edilen3.3K Takipçiler
Ian retweetledi
Peter Clack
Peter Clack@PeterDClack·
The world will have to deal with 43 million tons of decommissioned wind turbine blades by Net Zero in 2050. To put that in perspective, it’s the equivalent weight of 215,000 locomotives. These blades are made of high-strength composites designed to survive decades of brutal weather, and they are notoriously difficult to recycle. They were built to last, but they weren't built to disappear. Every turbine standing today will likely be decommissioned and replaced at least once before 2050. Without a cost-effective way to recycle fibre-reinforced polymers, the majority of these massive blades are destined for eternity - buried forever in turbine graveyards. China, Europe, and the US will account for the vast majority of this waste, creating a mountainous industrial heartache that many Net Zero models simply haven't priced in. But 43 million tons of purely composite blade waste every 20 years is a colossal physical reality.
Peter Clack tweet media
Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English
1.3K
8.1K
14.6K
542.1K
Ian retweetledi
Global Dissident
Global Dissident@GlobalDiss·
🚨🇷🇴 BREAKING: ROMANIA GOV COLLAPSES PM Bolojan OUT after no confidence vote, 281 MPs backed it 10 months of “pro-Europeans” = MORE TAXES, WAR TALK, POVERTY Parliament pulled the plug THE PEOPLE SPOKE
Global Dissident tweet mediaGlobal Dissident tweet media
English
214
3.1K
10.7K
95.6K
Ian retweetledi
Suomalaiset kenraalit
Suomalaiset kenraalit@KenraalitSuomi·
The EU is a far‑left monster — a corrupt, unelected bureaucracy drowning in woke ideology. EU isn't about safety. It's about total control: digital ID, chat surveillance, VPN bans. Brussels doesn't want citizens. It wants obedient subjects. Tear it down.
English
555
3.6K
11.1K
99.9K
Ian
Ian@ISCOSEU·
A re-minder.
English
0
0
0
4
Ian retweetledi
Valerie Anne Smith
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970·
They are going to TAX YOUR WATER... WEF managing director Gim Huay Neo: "Beyond carbon taxes, let's think about other aspects of nature that are easier to quantify." "What about water?"
English
459
1.1K
1.5K
204.7K
Ian retweetledi
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH@NicHulscher·
COMPLETE REMISSIONS of Stage IV cancers using anti-parasitics are now being documented in the peer-reviewed literature. HUNDREDS of studies show ivermectin and mebendazole exert over 12 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types. A recent study found intranasal nano-ivermectin shrinks glioblastoma brain tumors by 70% in just 10 days in rats — with ZERO toxicity.
Dr. Dawn Michael@DawnsMission

BOOM Big Pharma is scrambing to cove this up, but the cat is out of the bag. MEL GIBSON said that he had 3 friends all of them had stage four cancer. All 3 don't have cancer anymore. JOE ROGAN asked, "What did they take?" "Ivermectin and Fenbendazole."

English
107
3.6K
8.7K
294.5K
Ian retweetledi
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
Germany built one of the largest wind and solar fleets on Earth. It dismantled its nuclear power stations and retired its coal, with the promise that green energy would power its future. The country spent billions transitioning. Then winter arrived, and "Dunkelflaute" hit - the dark windless dead zone. Wind and solar fell to barely 5% of demand. The grid staggered. And Germany was forced to fire up old coal plants it said had closed forever, and import expensive nuclear from France. This is the physics politicians fail to mention, and a point many people still fail to grasp. When the wind dies and the sun sets, renewables disappear. And the only way the grid survives, the only reason countless millions don't freeze to death, is thanks to oil, coal, nuclear and gas.
English
251
3K
6.9K
158.3K
Ian retweetledi
The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts
Catherine Austin Fitts Warns of an All-Seeing Digital Control Grid with @freedom_rsrch (Full Interview) "In a new interview to Freedom Research, Catherine Austin Fitts poses the question of how would have Covid lockdowns been enforced if programmable money (CBDCs) had already been rolled out at the time. To put it simply, this is the kind of “money” that has levers for control on where and how it is spent. “If I put you in a 15-minute city and I don’t want you to leave this 15-minute city, the rules won’t work outside your 15-minute city,” she says – but if money itself gets custom designed, so to speak, the situation will be different. “You can then embed highly complex rule systems to manage each individual as well as to manage groups of individuals,” Fitts explains. Now, if you look at all the elements of the system Fitts calls the digital control grid – facial recognition cameras, QR code checkpoints, smartphones, etc., and you have AI data centers to analyse them all – then once you fuse it all together, it’s a digital concentration camp." Full Report: freedom-research.org/p/its-a-digita… Subscribe to shop.solari.com
English
24
394
715
22.2K
Ian retweetledi
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨 Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️ Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.” Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.” Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.” Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.” Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.” Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.” Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.” Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.” Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.” Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.” Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.” Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance. Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling. The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥 Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack: open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…
Anika tweet media
English
208
3.1K
5.5K
106.2K
Ian retweetledi
Alexander Mercouris
Alexander Mercouris@AMercouris·
I have repeatedly said that the way to understand Vladimir PUTIN is to remember that he is a lawyer. What happened during yesterday's call was that PUTIN gave TRUMP a CEASE AND DESIST demand. The Kremlin's wording could not be more clear "if the United States and Israel resume military action, this would inevitably lead to extremely adverse consequences not only for Iran and its neighbours, but for the entire international community...... a ground operation on Iranian territory would be particularly unacceptable and dangerous." Classic lawyer's language, backed by the implicit threat provided by Russia's continued support for Iran. For the moment it looks as if Trump is heeding the demand which is why the call in all other respects went well. All discussed in this video youtube.com/watch?v=YLjZXn… @barnes_law @LarrySonar21 @MearsheimerJ @Glenn_Diesen @ggreenwald @TheGrayzoneNews @MaxBlumenthal @aaronjmate
YouTube video
YouTube
English
162
862
3.1K
317.5K
Ian retweetledi
Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik
Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik@EwaZajaczkowska·
🚨 Bardzo ważna sprawa, proszę o podawanie dalej❗ W Parlamencie Europejskim cała koalicja Tuska głosowała za przepisami dążącymi do odebrania Polsce prawa weta w UE❗ 👉 To jest jawna zdrada polskich interesów i droga do całkowitej likwidacji naszej suwerenności! Zapisy dotyczące likwidacji prawa weta w obszarach o strategicznym znaczeniu zostały sprytnie przemycone jako poprawka do projektu ws. budżetu UE. I to wszystko dzieje się zaraz po tym jak von der Leyen wzywała państwa członkowskie do poparcia usunięcia zasady jednomyślności w UE w sprawach bezpieczeństwa i polityki zagranicznej, czyli właśnie do zniesienia prawa weta. Cała zgraja europosłów Tuska, Kosiniaka i Czarzastego jak zwykle na zawołanie klęknęła przed Brukselą! To niezwykle ważne głosowanie dla Polaków, które trzeba nagłaśniać, bo koalicja Tuska siedzi cichutko w tej sprawie - jakoś się tym nie chwalą, więc zróbmy to za nich! Oto lista europarlamentarnych zdrajców Polski, którzy zagłosowali przeciwko naszemu państwu: ❌ KO: Magdalena Adamowicz, Bartosz Arłukowicz, Krzysztof Brejza, Borys Budka, Andrzej Buła, Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz, Adam Halicki, Łukasz Kohut, Dariusz Joński, Ewa Kopacz, Janusz Lewandowski, Elżbieta Łukaciejewska, Jagna Marczułajtis-Walczak, Jacek Protas, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Łukasz Szczerba, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Marta Wcisło, Bogdan Zdrojewski, ❌ Lewica: Robert Biedroń, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus ❌ PSL: Krzysztof Hetman, Adam Jarubas ❌ Michał Kobosko (do niedawna Polska2050) Cel unijnych pseudoelit jest jasny – stworzenie scentralizowanego, zbiurokratyzowanego superpaństwa, gdzie decyzje zapadają ponad głowami narodów. Jak widać politycy z koalicji Tuska są gotowi sprzedać Polskę, ale ja będę bronić zasady jednomyślności do końca – to ostatni bezpiecznik naszej niezależności i gwarancja, że Polska nie zostanie zmuszona do decyzji sprzecznych z jej interesem narodowym. Dlatego apelują do Was o wsparcie i rozpowszechnianie tego! Nie możemy pozwolić, by przyszłość naszego państwa została zapisana w gabinetach unijnych urzędników. Polska nie może być niemiecko-brukselską kolonią – ma być wolnym, dumnym i suwerennym państwem! 🇵🇱
Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik tweet media
Polski
449
4.2K
7.8K
82.6K
Ian retweetledi
Redacted
Redacted@RedactedNews·
The Strait of Malacca is next. It carries 7 times more traffic than the Panama Canal. @Michael_Yon predicted Nordstream, Groningen, and the screwworm invasion years in advance. He says global famine is being engineered on purpose and the next choke point is already in play.
English
29
398
1K
42.2K
Ian retweetledi
Richard Werner
Richard Werner@scientificecon·
It should be a European priority to preserve and support its indigenous peoples, who are a small minority in the world. Instead the EU is aiming at genocide. In line with the "values" praised by chief Commissar von der Leyen.
ADONIS@adonispara

Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, Slavic, Celtic, Iberian. Europe holds the record for the most eye and hair color variation of any continent on Earth. we dont need immigrants for diversity.

English
35
227
1.2K
28.6K
Ian retweetledi
Glenn Diesen
Glenn Diesen@Glenn_Diesen·
The war against Iran enables the US to replace energy supplies in East Asia, much like NATO's proxy war in Ukraine enables the US to replace Russian energy supplies to Europe.
Glenn Diesen tweet media
English
47
339
858
18K
Ian retweetledi
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenet·
Electric cars are sold as clean. Yes, EVs cut tailpipe pollution, but if the goal is CO2 reduction, the full chain tells a different story. The production of an EV requires more mining, refining, battery production and power generation over a standard petrol or diesel car. Battery minerals are dug up and processed elsewhere. Air, water, soil and workers take the hit. Across the full chain, EVs cut CO2 by only 20%. But on top of that, batteries degrade. Over an EV's life, one battery replacement will collapse any CO2 advantage. EVs also add major electricity demand. They do not erase the old energy system. They load more pressure onto it. So this is not zero emissions. If you want to charge your EV at night or when the wind isn't blowing, then it will be 100% fossil fuel powering that. EVs are not green. They are virtue signaling on wheels.
English
91
658
1.1K
19.9K