Ian Stevens 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇬🇪

"Everyone could of and should of done more." Stephanie Roberts-Bibby, Chief Executive of the Youth Justice Board, says that despite the best efforts of public services opportunities were missed to stop the Southport killer from carrying out his deadly attack.

A Reform government would ban visas to nationals of these countries unless they drop their demands for reparations: Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize CARICOM Dominica Ghana Grenada Guyana Haiti Jamaica Kenya Montserrat Nigeria St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago

The hatreds of old Peterhouse were a malevolent potpourri of cacti, arsenic, and decomposing fungi. Poisonous though it was, it was also vastly entertaining and intellectually stimulating. Germaine Greer for example adored it even though it was her ideological antithesis.

Lucy Letby did not lie about being arrested in pyjamas. The police footage clearly show her wearing something underneath her tracksuit top. Probably a nightie or pyjama top. She says in answer to her KC. Q. So when they came, what happened with you? A. They told me that I was being arrested for multiple counts of murder and attempted murder. And then they quickly handcuffed me and took me away. Q: And you were taken to a police station. Is that right? A. In my pyjamas, yes. She is clearly stating that she was taken to the police station quickly without being given the chance to change out of the clothes she answered the door in only 11 minutes earlier, as the pictures clearly show. For what its worth she was given a change of clothes to be interviewed in later in the day. What she says is true and at no point does she say "I was taken to a police station wearing nothing but my pyjamas." the worst she can be accused of is putting a spin on her answer that could imply that. That is nothing compared to the outrageous spin that Nicholas Johnson puts on her answer, He implies that because she doesn't mention the tracksuit top that she put on over her nightwear to answer the door that means she was lying about wearing nightwear at all. He than goes on to ask a a series of questions about what she was wearing for her subsequent arrests in 2019 and 2020 and falsely accuses her of lying even though she had said nothing about these arrests. In one of those questions he acknowledges that Nightwear or pyjamas are interchangeable terms. "Q: Oh! But you told the jury you were taken away in your nightwear, in your pyjamas, I think was how you put it." This is one more example of the prosecution spinning a false accusation of lying to bolster their weak case. The full exchange of questions and answers from the trial are below: Examination of Lucy Letby by Ben Myers KC, 2nd May 2023 Q. Are you able to just describe in simple terms the impact of your arrest and that process on you? Let me start with this: How did you know the police were coming that day? What's the first you knew? A. When there was a loud knocking at the door at 6 o'clock in the morning by the police. Q. You were at home in 41 Westbourne Road, Chester. Is that right? A. I was, yes. Q. Were you on your own there, as it happens? A. No, my father was staying with me at that point so he was there as well. Q. Had you any idea the police were coming that day? A. No, none at all. Q. So when they came, what happened with you? A. They told me that I was being arrested for multiple counts of murder and attempted murder. And then they quickly handcuffed me and took me away. Q. All right. And you were taken to a police station. Is that right? A. In my pyjamas, yes. Q. And over the next three days you were interviewed at various times. A. Yes. Q. And we've asked DS Stonier about that. Again, the way that was done is just the way the police deal with it and that's not critical of them for the process they followed. When that process had ended after the three days of interviews, were you released from police custody? A. Yes, I was, yes Cross-examination of Lucy Letby by Nicolas Johnson KC, 9th June 2023 Q: And you have also deliberately misled them about the circumstances of your arrest, haven't you? A: No. Q: We'll just remind us about what happened when you were arrested? A: What do you mean? Q: You really don't remember? A: You want me to describe how I was arrested? Q: Yes. How awful it was and why it was so awful. A: I've already explained that once. Q: Yes. Well, it's a long time ago and I'd like you to remind us, please? A: They knocked at my door at six o'clock in the morning and they arrested me. Q: And how were you dressed when you left the house? A: I think I had a nighty on and then a tracksuit bottom and top and trainers. Q: Oh! But you told the jury you were taken away in your nightwear, in your pajamas, I think was how you put it. A: Yes. Q: You were taken away in a blue Lee Cooper leisure suit, weren't you? A: I don't recall exactly, I just know I had a nighty on. Q: Do you want me to show you a video of it? A: No. Q: Well, I'll ask you again. You were taken away in a blue Lee Cooper leisure suit, weren't you? A: Yes. (NOTE She has given a completely correct answer about what she was wearing when taken to the police station and why that included her nightmare which she answered the door in 11 minutes earlier. So he does not accuse her of Lying at that point but switches the questions to her second arrest which is totally irrelevant as she has said noting about what she was wearing then.) Q: On the 10th of June 2019 when you answered the door, you answered in your nighty. (NOTE that question is a lie, he already knows that she didn't answer the door) A: No, I didn't answer the door in 2019. Q: Oh! You've got a very clear memory of this then, haven't you? A: Yes, I remember this through the -- the arrests, yes. Q: When the police came face-to-face with you, you had a nightie on, didn't you? A: In 2019, Q: yes. A: I had my pyjamas on, yes. Q: No, you had a nightie on. A: Okay. Q: Do you want to see a video? A: No. Q: Do you remember having a nightie on? A: I can't recall specifically which night I was in bed. Q: Do you remember what you left the house wearing? A: Um... No. I know I was able to get dressed, and I think I took a dressing gown as well. Q: You put your blue Lee Cooper leisure suit on again, didn't you? A: Yes. Q: Then you asked them to let you put your dressing gown on over the Lee Cooper leisure suit, didn't you? A: Yes. Q: So you weren't taken away in your pyjamas, were you? A: No. Q: And you remember this, don't you? A: Yes. Q: Why did you lie to the jury about it? (NOTE that question is itself a lie as she had said nothing in her answered to her council about how she was dressed at the second arrest in 2019) A: I don't know. (NOTE She is not admitting to lying with this answer, she is just saying that she can't answer a rhetorical question based on the inaccurate statement that she was lying) Q: You don't know. What advantage were you looking for by telling the jury that you were taken away by the police in your pyjamas? What benefit was there? A: Because that's what happened on the first time. That was how quickly everything happened. Q: No, no. On the first time, you were taken away in your blue Lee Cooper... Do you want to watch the video? (pause) Q: You are a very calculating woman. Aren't you Lucy Letty? A: No. Q: You tell lies deliberately, don't you? A: No. Q: And the reason you tell lies is to try to get sympathy from people, isn't it? A: No. Q: You try to get attention from people, don't you? A: No. Q: In killing these children, you got quite a lot of attention, didn't you? A: I didn't kill the children. Q: And you're getting quite a lot of attention now, aren't you? you. (pause) Q: On the third arrest, you left the house in a pink or salmon pink colored GAP leisure suit. Didn't you? A: I can't recall agane. I don't know. Q: You weren't in your pajamas. Were you? A: No.

🚨A BRITISH SOLDIER SPEAKS FOR MILLIONS “I sacrificed my life to secure this country's freedom and its freedom of speech — and now you arrest people for words while turning a blind eye to crimes committed by invaders. You are a disgrace to your uniform and you are an insult to mine.” A moment like this cuts through everything. When a serving soldier—in full uniform—has to remind the police what this nation stands for, it proves just how far we’ve fallen. Britain’s armed forces understand sacrifice, duty, and loyalty to the people. They also see betrayal when it's unfolding right in front of them. This is not about politics. This is about truth, honour, and the survival of the nation our soldiers pledged their lives to defend. History will look back on these days, and those who stayed silent will not be remembered kindly.

'Homophobia! It Ain't Half Hot Mum? What about Alf Garnett?' Nigel Farage accuses the BBC of racism and homophobia after being questioned on alleged comments he made at school.

Victoria Derbyshire humiliates Labour's Minister for Courts and Legal Services, Sarah Sackman MP By citing David Lammy's own tweet criticising the cutting of jury trials Eventually, she concedes that it's driven a lack of funding