Igor

Missed trades cost nothing. Bad trades do. Discipline pays. Participation doesn’t.

@BitcoinSapiens In 2034 maybe.

This chart says Bitcoin is going to $327,000 soon 🚀

@SuperBitcoinBro Your chart contradicts your statement.

Anybody who promises lower prices on bitcoin is either lying or selling something. Or both. I am buying heavily below $70K. If the weekly closes below the dotted line, I will cut a portion of the position and attempt to redeploy lower. Simple. Low risk. High reward.

@SolSammi 😂

Real 😂

Second similar bearish formation on LTF. That’s your entry if not in yet. Super-tight invalidation. $BTC.

$BTC Short. Haven’t shared this entry initially due to the market conditions. Added at 71.5 when clean bearish structure formed. 71.5 is now an invalidation zone on my trailing stop. Targets update later after a clean support break (70k).

This is a dangerously premature take. There is no credible evidence this conflict is anywhere near resolution. If anything, history shows these situations tend to drag, expand, and escalate, not neatly “resolve” on cue for markets. More importantly, markets don’t just react to headlines — they react to second-order effects, and we’re already seeing them: • Energy prices are rising and remain structurally unstable • Supply chains and shipping routes are being disrupted • Risk premiums are expanding across multiple sectors Energy + geopolitical instability are not minor variables — they are core systemic risks. For financial institutions, these are literally at the top of the risk stack. When those two are elevated simultaneously, capital does not rush back in — it becomes defensive. The damage is not hypothetical — it’s already being priced in, and more importantly, it’s ongoing. You don’t flip a switch and get “trillions re-entering” while uncertainty remains unresolved and potentially worsening. Also, framing this as some imminent “millionaire-making rally” is irresponsible. It ignores the reality that: 1.Conflicts rarely resolve quickly 2.Markets price uncertainty faster than they price optimism 3.Volatility regimes tend to persist once triggered We are far more likely in the early phase of a broader risk cycle than at the end of one. Pushing a one-sided bullish narrative in this environment isn’t analysis — it’s marketing. This isn’t the end of the storm. It’s the beginning.

Once the US/Iran conflict resolves, we will see an aggressive rally to the upside. Trillions are waiting to re-enter the market. Millionaires will be made. Follow me to increase your chances.

@Teambuertrades 🔻

Real ones know what's next.

@nayibbukele @elonmusk One of the saddest stories of 2025…

Impeach the corrupt judges.

@elonmusk You got rid of the only product that positioned #Tesla as a luxury brand. Now it’s just a high-tech company.

Only a few hundred Tesla Model S & X cars left in inventory. Order now if you want one.

@follis_ 😂👌🏻

Babe wake up new pattern just dropped $BTC

@elonmusk Bring Model S back! 😭

You can’t make this shit up 😂

$ETH / $USD - Update Retested that breakout level perfectly. Now can we get another leg up.

$BTC We have NOT broken out of HTF downtrend yet. This is a line in a sand. Weekly 12 EMA tested.

@CryptoTony__ I like this bear so much more so far. Bull was a mess.

You can make in a bull and a bear market.

@Nico_pltrs Threw in a short starter at 71.8 as well. But it’s not a hight probability setup. It’s a bit too obvious. MMs like to f*ck obvious setups over, especially in such volatile environments. x.com/igortradesx/st…

$BTC short entry: 71.38k SL: 72.9k TP: CME gap 67.1k -> ~2.9R context: > swept high > structure break > now retesting range VAH acceptance below -> continuation likely target remains inefficiency (CME close) no follow-through -> invalidation stands execution > prediction

$BTC We’re in the beginning of the compression zone. Bear div forming. 50/50 chance of ~73k sweep. Markets still neutral. Patience.