Nat Lee Meow

31.1K posts

Nat Lee Meow banner
Nat Lee Meow

Nat Lee Meow

@Imnotbovvered

She 🇹🇹 Happily melanated Shameless brazen hussy Im not gonne be nice to bigots & racists. #SussexSquad We're here to stay and you gone be mad all day

Earth Katılım Mayıs 2007
674 Takip Edilen549 Takipçiler
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
Listen Im not going back & forth with racist this fine Sunday. I can't even take you fools seriously. The trump administration is composed of the most unqualified gaggle of individuals ever assembled and you're fine with that because wyt mediocrity is acceptable to you all.
GIF
English
0
0
8
190
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
The average American reads at a 7th- to 8th-grade level. A bunch of them are in the comments arguing with this doctor.
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson

I disagree with the Department of Justice going after Yale School of Medicine over DEI admissions policies and arguing that objective metrics like GPA and MCAT scores should dominate admissions decisions. The evidence does not support the idea that standardized test scores alone identify the best physicians. The MCAT predicts performance on other multiple-choice exams reasonably well. What MCAT scores do NOT predict are clinical judgment, communication, bedside skill, or physician performance. Put another way: doctors who test well tend to do well on examinations. But test scores do not predict how well they care for patients in clinics, hospitals, surgery, or real-world medicine. Meanwhile, more diverse physician workforces are associated with better preventive care, greater trust, improved access, and lower mortality in underserved communities. There is no objective evidence that excluding minority applicants within a reasonable score range improves patient outcomes. We need minority physicians in this country, and we have the data to prove why. So when people insist that “objective measures” alone should determine admission into medicine — while ignoring the evidence about what actually improves patient care — I increasingly see that argument as less about merit and more about preserving exclusion under the comforting language of statistics. "Equality feels like oppression to those who are privileged"

English
11
40
345
8.1K
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
@DisruptiveViz Yes he has, they are purposely missing his point. They don't want to see Black people in these spaces at all.
English
0
0
6
143
DisruptiveVisions
DisruptiveVisions@DisruptiveViz·
@Imnotbovvered The small amount of comments are doing the same here 😂 he’s explained multiple times there’s more to getting admitted than scores. Letters of recommendation, interviews, etc… If you’ve ever been around some of the professional test takers you do not want them to be your doctor.
English
1
0
6
195
Andrew Strobert
Andrew Strobert@drewS60288·
@Imnotbovvered ah, so we need to be medical doctors to understand civil rights and discrimination thanks for spelling that out :)
English
1
0
1
67
lt
lt@bmu594760333·
@Imnotbovvered And with the current standards that this doctor pushes those Americans could get into Medical school
English
1
0
0
17
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
@qili00 That's not what he said at all. Thanks for playing.
English
0
0
0
3
qili00
qili00@qili00·
@Imnotbovvered Well the Dr. Insisted that degrees and scores don't suggest intelligence. So it would be foolish for the Drs. To appeal to authority now.
English
1
0
0
51
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
There's a bunch of replies to this that I didn't get notifications for. The app knows they're from the bottom of the barrel & doesn't even see the point in announcing their arrival.
English
0
0
5
269
Nat Lee Meow retweetledi
AFRICAN & BLACK HISTORY
AFRICAN & BLACK HISTORY@AfricanArchives·
James Baldwin on White Christians.
English
10
175
535
17.4K
Nat Lee Meow retweetledi
Tony Wilcher
Tony Wilcher@SeaBVue·
@AAGDhillon @CivilRights @TheJusticeDept Bingo! Thanks for the math Jeff! So please shut up AAGDhillon. Your point is pointless! 💀 Next topic please….let’s talk about something worth talking about!
Tony Wilcher tweet media
English
4
14
163
5.9K
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
@obamareichs @thisisformadden MLK whose entire living experience in this country was shaped and defined by his race from the day he was born until the day he was murdered?
English
0
0
0
2
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
@DapperDoser White Rosa Parks would get on the bus, sit in the front row and the movie would end right there.
English
0
0
1
9
Cousin Jeffrey
Cousin Jeffrey@DapperDoser·
@JayZ0verrat3d Yea, like if they rebooted The Matrix and made Morpheus white, no one would care. It doesn’t change the character or story. But how in the hell would Viggo Mortenson starring in 12 Years a Slave work? 😂 They’re so disingenuous
English
2
0
24
2.1K
Nat Lee Meow retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Ironically, your Hmong example actually strengthens the argument for looking beyond simplistic test rankings and crude demographic categories toward the fuller human context of applicants. Those of us who have actually served on admissions committees understand this far better than most people arguing online. Medical schools are well aware that broad census categories often fail to capture enormous differences in language, culture, immigration history, wealth, educational opportunity, and representation among subgroups. A Hmong applicant may have a profoundly different background and level of representation than the child of highly educated professionals from another Asian subgroup, despite both being collapsed into the same census label. And this is precisely why medicine does not — and should not — reduce admissions to a single numerical ranking system detached from lived reality, public-health needs, communication, resilience, adversity, and the broader qualities that shape physicians over time.
David Bernstein@ProfDBernstein

"Asian students comprise roughly 27% of the student body while representing a much smaller percentage of the overall population." 1. Asian students don't "represent" anyone but themselves. 2. "Asian" is a nonsense classification to begin with. What does a Pakistani have in common with a Filipino? 3. Some Asian subgroups are barely represented in medicine, why, eg, is having the 100th Mexican American more important, by Simpson's own logic, than the 1st Hmong?

English
19
6
64
6.2K
Nat Lee Meow
Nat Lee Meow@Imnotbovvered·
@AmericaFreedmen @drterrysimpson They always skip over the part where Black people pulled themselves up by their "bootstraps" kept to themselves and built thriving communities, whites got jealous, burned them to the ground and murdered a bunch of innocent men, women and children
English
0
0
2
13
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
Jewish success in America is a remarkable story of resilience, education, family cohesion, cultural emphasis on scholarship, and perseverance despite horrific discrimination. But the strange thing about these conversations is how often one minority group’s success gets weaponized against another group’s struggles, as though history distributes barriers evenly across populations, eras, geography, law, wealth, immigration patterns, and educational opportunity. The children of immigrants arriving with intact family structures and intense educational traditions may face very different obstacles than communities shaped by centuries of slavery, segregation, redlining, unequal schools, exclusion from wealth accumulation, or generational poverty. History is not a laboratory experiment with perfectly matched controls. And importantly, none of this changes the central point: medicine is trying to identify capable future physicians, not merely rank human beings by standardized testing performance detached from context, opportunity, and lived experience.
Karen Rylander@KarenRylander

@drterrysimpson I’d prefer to look at the Jews, many of whom came to America impoverished and discriminated against, and look at what they’ve made of themselves.

English
13
40
187
6K
blue dog geosh
blue dog geosh@bluedoggeosh·
What leftists missed in history class about Martin Luther King and Malcolm X is that they hated performative politics. They respected the people doing the actual work, instead of moral grandstanding and hindering the people that are actually doing it. And that’s why leftists should never convince you MLK and Malcolm X would have even respected them, let alone endorsed them.
English
35
99
360
8.2K
PATRIA O MUERTE 🇲🇽
PATRIA O MUERTE 🇲🇽@comradecompa·
@bluedoggeosh You can take the Uncle Tom arguments to people stupid enough to listen. That blue maga BS will cost you another important election. I suggest getting off that “educated” high horse and hitting the streets bud. t”
English
4
1
3
47
Nat Lee Meow retweetledi
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
What is striking here is the repeated attempt to collapse a complicated legal, educational, and public-health discussion into the simplistic slogan: “same scores must mean same admissions outcome.” That is not objectivity. It is a kind of secular astrology for technocrats. That is not how holistic admissions have ever functioned in American higher education — not before Bakke, not after Bakke, and not even after the 2023 Supreme Court rulings. The Court restricted explicit race-based preferences. It did NOT abolish holistic review, nor did it require universities to become automated MCAT sorting machines. And what continues to go almost entirely ignored in these discussions is the actual evidence. The literature does NOT show that small differences in MCAT or SAT scores among already highly capable applicants reliably predict who becomes the best physician, lawyer, scientist, or leader. Meanwhile, medicine does have evidence that physician diversity improves trust, underserved access, preventive care uptake, and some health outcomes. Instead, critics keep treating standardized test scores as though they are sacred numerical revelations capable of fully capturing human potential. .
David Bernstein@ProfDBernstein

BTW, the libertarian in me would give private institutions leeway to adjust their admissions standards anyway they choose, so long as they are transparent about it. Want to prefer applicants from Group X? Go for it! But the law is to the contrary, and this mentality among elites that they have their ideological priorities, and they, unlike everyone else, should be above the law, is something to behold. As are the disingenuous arguments to the effect of "why are you saying that SAT/LSAT/MCAT etc should be the entire thing? No one is saying that. What they are saying is that the law says that you can't have different admissions standards for different groups. If the SAT is important for Asian students, it should have the same importance for Hispanic students. If it's not, then it's not for either group. It's completely disingenuous to say that the SAT is important for Cambodian American, but suddenly becomes much less important for a Peruvian American.

English
5
9
21
3.6K