Weapon of Kings

23.8K posts

Weapon of Kings banner
Weapon of Kings

Weapon of Kings

@Imperius__13

What is a jury of your peers?

Katılım Temmuz 2017
361 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
I answer a question about what the larger project is.
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13

@War_Dharma All right, thanks for your patience. "With what purpose in mind?" The term we've sometimes used is metapolitical translation, which is the process whereby metapolitics becomes politics.

English
1
0
6
114.5K
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@Mister_Peabody @bonchieredstate The cost of these military operations isn't that high, and the net cost even lower when we do a full accounting with the benefits. The big thing weighing on the budget is entitlements.
English
0
0
0
2
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
It's literally just the same podcasters all interviewing each other over and over. And how many episodes in a row about Israel is this for Tucker "I don't want to talk about Israel" Carlson? Is someone keeping count?
Bonchie tweet media
English
256
312
2.5K
98.2K
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@SecretsOStandup @bonchieredstate Smart ecological practices are the most conservative, right wing thing there could be. You have several generations ahead of you in mind. People who rise to the level of a civilization architect take great interest in it. If you want to be a self-absorbed libertine, go for it.
English
0
0
0
1
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 I know how to do it for you, but obviously, events will process faster and I'm on the sideline and honestly I don't even care that much. My wheelhouse is something else. We'll just keep talking.
English
1
0
1
44
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
(Let me give you my own parenthetical remarks: Tucker is a fucking moron. He also wasn't attempting a techno-nationalist party. He's a delusional agrarian Jeffersonian which Jefferson himself had to throw off when he did sit at the center.) You guys need to play this game better.
English
2
0
1
51
bouvard
bouvard@bouvard38829538·
If the next president is a Republican and he wants to turn on Israel he would also have to repudiate Trump rather forcefully--but it will be tough to repudiate Trump on this single point alone and also tough to run on Trump being a failure.
English
1
0
0
117
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 I don't think you guys have anything to worry about. And of course the others will say it's because you made us do it, blah blah. It can't be that interests just aligned and favors were returned. Vance is tech bro first, and God knows where Tucker's business model even is going.
English
1
0
0
42
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 Main problem is how do you 'draft' (racing term) Trump? He's such an all-consuming figure. I know the people behind Vance (Thiel, Palantir, both very pro-Israel, so I was always perplexed why you doubted him—but I do get the strange glance at Tucker).
English
2
0
0
68
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 It's easy to draw a clean line that our Jewish allies who reciprocate aren't to be touched, but we need to move on from that and focus on real stuff.
English
1
0
1
31
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 I think those are lower order variables to be concerned with. We are indeed in serious trouble, but we have to get to the bigger stuff.
English
1
0
0
32
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 The dude is literally married to an Indian, and you have doubts whether he's a white nationalist?
English
1
0
1
27
bouvard
bouvard@bouvard38829538·
@Imperius__13 The point is not whethr anyone is a loser; nor do I see anyone pulling back.
English
1
0
0
31
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 DD: "I endorse DJT for presidency." DJT: "Well, I don't know David Duke, never heard of him. You're telling me this for the first time."
English
1
0
0
19
bouvard
bouvard@bouvard38829538·
@Imperius__13 Trump would not need to equivocate on any of this.
English
1
0
0
27
Sean Davis
Sean Davis@seanmdav·
It did extreme damage to Trump among apolitical men under 40 who believed he was The Guy who would finally blow the system up. The war in Iran (and the perception it was waged at Israel’s behest) was the nail in the political coffin for those voters. Democrats understood this dynamic immediately, which is why they jumped in so quickly (and cravenly, given their own long histories with Epstein) to capitalize on the error.
Cernovich@Cernovich

Epstein files cover up hurt Trump more than the war.

English
167
258
2.3K
164.7K
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@wajacobson Always found it weird when it came out that his mother abandoned him and his brother.
English
0
0
2
23
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@danturrentine You act like this is anything new in politics. Aren't you supposed to be a specialist?
English
0
0
1
41
dan turrentine
dan turrentine@danturrentine·
Fascinating this week to watch Trump road test definitions of victory every few hours, seeing if something sticks. Keeping all options open, while being intentionally vague is right out of The Art of The Deal.
English
7
0
10
1.9K
Andy Crouch
Andy Crouch@ahc·
Just spent two days with senior staff at Anthropic and a group of Christians deeply committed to finding redemptive paths for AI. Encouraging on many fronts. Above all I think the guests were unanimously blown away by the humility and moral seriousness of Anthropic's leadership.
English
45
42
928
79.2K
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 I think there can be an opening for repudiation, but I doubt it would happen by an attack on Tucker. It'd instead be that network pull back and backchannels understand. And as I said, Vance already called Fuentes an embarrassing loser.
English
1
0
1
33
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@bouvard38829538 Alex Jones interviewed DJT, as controversial as the former was, and DJT bobbed and danced around. This is politics. What's the substantive argument? I know it's gross to metaphysicians, but then why are you around it?
English
2
0
1
39
Gnostic Informant | Neal Sendlak
This is NOT an April fools prank either.
Derek Lambert MythVision Podcast@DerekPodcast

I need to tell you all what just happened because I'm still processing it. I texted my buddy Neal Sendlak from @GnosticInformant and asked if he wanted to grab lunch. He said "yeah meet me at this address." I didn't think anything of it. I pulled up. It was a church. An Orthodox church. I thought maybe he was filming something inside, doing research for a video, whatever. I walked in and this man greeted me at the door in FULL Orthodox priestly vestments. Gold embroidery. The hat. The cross. The whole thing. He was weeping. Not like a single tear. I'm talking full body shaking, snot running, hands trembling, ugly crying. I said "Neal what the hell is going on?" He grabbed both my shoulders, looked me dead in the eyes and said "Derek. Jay Dyer was right. About everything. I watched the debate again last night and I couldn't resist the truth anymore. The Orthodox Church is the one true faith and I've given my life to Christ. I'm being ordained next month." I stood there in silence for about ten seconds. Then he told me he's already reached out to Alex Jones about appearing on Infowars to share his testimony. He said and I quote "the Ortho bros saw something I was blind to, Derek. The icons aren't idols. They're windows to heaven. I see it now." He then tried to bless me with some kind of oil and I had to physically back away because I'm Catholic and he's not a real Christian on the same level as me. He's also changing his channel name to "Gnostic Repentant" and his first video will be "Why I Was Wrong About Everything: My Journey to Holy Orthodoxy." APRIL FOOLS YOU LEGENDS!

English
4
1
42
1.8K
Weapon of Kings
Weapon of Kings@Imperius__13·
@NateAFischer Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett are only interested in their families being enfranchised in D.C. The abortion issue was the perfect red herring for proof of real allegiance. High-minded and no substance.
English
0
0
4
106
Weapon of Kings retweetledi
Nate Fischer
Nate Fischer@NateAFischer·
If the constitution mandates absurdities (e.g., protecting intentional efforts to defraud the United States) then neither it nor the courts deserve the respect Roberts is so desperate to preserve.
The Post Millennial@TPostMillennial

John Sauer: “We’re in a new world now as Justice Alito pointed out where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who is a US citizen.” John Roberts: “It’s a new world, but it’s the same Constitution.”

English
7
18
143
8.3K