Imray Phee

3K posts

Imray Phee banner
Imray Phee

Imray Phee

@ImrayPhee

Glatt Kosher Comedian Member of the Frum Twitter Bourgeoisie. I/me

Out of Town Katılım Eylül 2010
1.4K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
Underrated tweets 👇
English
15
0
14
0
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@Sarahwantstosee @VaadHaBadchanim Is it really so crazy? He's not the Lubavitcher Rebbe. Try to think outside your bubble. There are very well known rabbonim in my bubble who you've also never heard of.
English
1
0
0
23
Vaad HaBadchanim
Vaad HaBadchanim@VaadHaBadchanim·
We just confirmed with the administration of the Beis Din of America that this is not fraudulent and this document was indeed “accurate and signed by Rabbi Willig”.
Vaad HaBadchanim tweet media
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee

@jacobtaber @jewishmemequeen I looked into this. Yes it is fraudulent. Rabbi Mordechai Willig did not write this or sign this.

English
14
13
181
36.3K
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@natanmywatch_ Huh? No. It's on the person making the audacious claim to prove it publicly. Rabbi Willig made an audacious and false claim about me. I had never even heard of him. Did you ask him for any evidence ?
English
3
0
0
312
NVP
NVP@natanmywatch_·
@ImrayPhee I don't care to dm you, if you want to make audacious claims against Rav Willig and the BDA that are awfully convenient for you, it's on you to prove it publicly. I'm not tolerating you trying to muddy the water with speculation and conjecture that proves absolutely nothing.
English
1
1
6
259
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
PSA: Seeing a rabbi's signature on a proclamation doesn't necessarily mean the rabbi has any knowledge what it's proclaiming. Or that he knows his signature is on the proclamation at all.
English
8
1
13
2.7K
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@EliLake But major, recognized organizations and institutions like the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and so on said there was genocide. These are recognized established institutions. I'm struggling to understand how it can't be true.
English
4
0
0
427
Eli Lake
Eli Lake@EliLake·
There was no genocide. There was no famine. And there are no rape dogs. But on October 7, 2023 Hamas and other Palestinian raiders launched a war with mass rape and murder. Many filmed their atrocities. Here is a conclusive report documenting that horror. …1-400e-ae14-65ae0400675b.filesusr.com/ugd/aab121_882…
English
416
922
3.6K
66.7K
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@VaadHaBadchanim @sshaf91 The "fake Beis Din" contacted all the parties. Rav Willig "signed" a siruv against someone (causing life altering consequences and chilul Hashem) without contacting ANY of the parties. Let's stick to 🤡 ing around. Unless that's actually what you're trying to do here.
English
0
0
2
125
Vaad HaBadchanim
Vaad HaBadchanim@VaadHaBadchanim·
You’re right. No one should ever take the Vaad HaBadchanim seriously. We’re just frum Twitter clowns with a logo. But this was never about whether people should take us seriously. It was about whether people should take an agunah seriously. So why did we get involved? 🧵
Anony Mouse@__I_l_l__l

@VaadHaBadchanim It's important that we take the vaad habadchanim super seriously you guys

English
6
9
58
9K
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@aBurningbush @VaadHaBadchanim If a Dayan is so confident that he doesnt need to contact the parties, nor have an appeal process.... he might be the bad one.
GIF
English
1
0
0
88
The burning bush
The burning bush@aBurningbush·
@VaadHaBadchanim Many Great points. I'm just trying to figure out how we decided that one Bais Din is the "good one" and the other the "bad one"?
English
3
0
1
132
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@VaadHaBadchanim The people who assign the term "agunah" to women who initiate and continue pursuing contested divorces are the ones turning "agunah" into a punchline. Please stop.
English
2
0
1
128
Vaad HaBadchanim
Vaad HaBadchanim@VaadHaBadchanim·
That is when we posted that putting “agunah” in quotes was belittling the agunah crisis. Because it was. You can have grievances in a divorce. You can believe you were wronged. You can think the campaign against you is unfair or even cruel. But “agunah” is not a punchline. 7/
English
2
1
30
870
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@VaadHaBadchanim What is your chayev legaresh ruling based on? Please stop, you don't know what you are talking about or doing.
English
0
0
2
151
Vaad HaBadchanim
Vaad HaBadchanim@VaadHaBadchanim·
So yes, please, please, do not take the Vaad HaBadchanim seriously. But take this seriously: Raphi Stein should give Adeena Kohn a gett. Not after another campaign. Not after another legal theory. Not after another fake procedural escape hatch. Now. 20/20
English
8
6
74
1.7K
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@VaadHaBadchanim Did you ask R' Willig when he contacted the parties? He didn’t. Did you ask him if he has jurisdiction over their lives? He doesn’t. Is there an appeal process in case he makes an error? There isn’t This is an excuse to bully and virtue signal. It’s the Free Palestine playbook
English
0
0
7
120
Vaad HaBadchanim
Vaad HaBadchanim@VaadHaBadchanim·
In this case, the BDA/Rav Willig seruv matters. This is not “he said, she said, and Twitter picked a side.” This is not “two complicated sides, so who are we to get involved?” This is one side flagrantly ignoring Rabbanim and a Beis Din that we hold of and listen to. 9/
English
2
2
32
865
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@FiveTownersLove Yes, the topic of there was a letter in support of a pedophile, but the point is that it's common practice for rabbis at that institution to sign proclamations without knowing what they are signing.
English
0
0
1
101
FiveTownersLove
FiveTownersLove@FiveTownersLove·
@ImrayPhee This unfortunate thing is entirely different issue that is not comparable in the slightest. The BDA (where Rav Willig heads the beis din) dealt with YOUR case. YOU have the ability to make this all stop by giving a gett so you can *BOTH* move on with your lives!
English
1
0
0
129
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@HEXas_ranger There's a clear legal and halachic process, and I have always followed it. There are ways to do it faster if the parties can reach agreements on some or all things, but we've sadly not taken many shortcuts.
English
0
0
1
179
Walker HEXas Ranger
Walker HEXas Ranger@HEXas_ranger·
@ImrayPhee Is your wife at least specifically aware of your exact reasoning? Like is it very clear to her what she would theoretically need to do in order to get the get and she just does not want to do that. Or it’s more like there’s nothing she could do at this point.
English
1
0
0
230
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@natanmywatch_ DM me and let me know who I'm chatting with and I'll share more of what I can, that I would prefer not posting publicly. Willig definitely did not know about the case in June 2023, after the date of "his" siruv. If he did sign it, it would raise questions of why, and why no psak
English
1
0
0
260
NVP
NVP@natanmywatch_·
@ImrayPhee You're saying just bc something appears to be so doesn't mean it is. But you provide no proof that Rav Willig doesn't know the facts. Also, docusign saves your signature for you to use in the future, occams razor suggests that's why the signatures are identical rather than fraud
English
2
0
1
339
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@natanmywatch_ You can DM me and let me know who I'm talking to if you want more specifics. I will not share everything on Twitter, but I do want to try to be as open and clear as I can with regard to the debunked "siruv", and the improprieties I discovered at @Beth_Din
English
0
0
0
97
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@natanmywatch_ Rav Mordechai Willig would not sign a siruv against a defendant in secular court, certainly not without providing a psak. When asked about this case shortly after the date on the siruv, he was entirely unaware of it. I later learned that his signature is used by many others.
English
2
0
0
112
FiveTownersLove
FiveTownersLove@FiveTownersLove·
@ImrayPhee One more time...TWO DIFFERENT BDA ADMINS HAVE CONFIRMED THAT THIS IS ACCURATE AND RABBI WILLIG KNOWS ABOUT IT.
English
1
1
3
152
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
@HEXas_ranger Not publicly. It's a very private matter, and there are far more exciting things on social media. I am trying not to comment, except to keep it from getting more out of control, and going forward more generally, to work toward making critical fixes to our laws and systems
English
4
0
6
510
Walker HEXas Ranger
Walker HEXas Ranger@HEXas_ranger·
@ImrayPhee Are you willing to share your side of things and your reasoning for doing what you're doing? or have you previously done that before and can send a link?
English
2
0
4
495
Imray Phee
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee·
Be especially cautious when the letter contains no "psak", no explanation of how the decision was arrived at, no disclosure of the facts that were considered or omitted
English
2
0
1
1.1K