Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Imray Phee
3K posts

Imray Phee
@ImrayPhee
Glatt Kosher Comedian Member of the Frum Twitter Bourgeoisie. I/me
Out of Town Katılım Eylül 2010
1.4K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler

@Sarahwantstosee @VaadHaBadchanim Is it really so crazy? He's not the Lubavitcher Rebbe. Try to think outside your bubble. There are very well known rabbonim in my bubble who you've also never heard of.
English

@ImrayPhee @VaadHaBadchanim You seriously never heard of Rabbi Willig?
English

We just confirmed with the administration of the Beis Din of America that this is not fraudulent and this document was indeed “accurate and signed by Rabbi Willig”.

Imray Phee@ImrayPhee
@jacobtaber @jewishmemequeen I looked into this. Yes it is fraudulent. Rabbi Mordechai Willig did not write this or sign this.
English

@natanmywatch_ Huh? No. It's on the person making the audacious claim to prove it publicly. Rabbi Willig made an audacious and false claim about me. I had never even heard of him. Did you ask him for any evidence ?
English

@ImrayPhee I don't care to dm you, if you want to make audacious claims against Rav Willig and the BDA that are awfully convenient for you, it's on you to prove it publicly. I'm not tolerating you trying to muddy the water with speculation and conjecture that proves absolutely nothing.
English

@EliLake But major, recognized organizations and institutions like the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and so on said there was genocide. These are recognized established institutions. I'm struggling to understand how it can't be true.
English

There was no genocide. There was no famine. And there are no rape dogs. But on October 7, 2023 Hamas and other Palestinian raiders launched a war with mass rape and murder. Many filmed their atrocities. Here is a conclusive report documenting that horror. …1-400e-ae14-65ae0400675b.filesusr.com/ugd/aab121_882…
English

@VaadHaBadchanim @sshaf91 The "fake Beis Din" contacted all the parties.
Rav Willig "signed" a siruv against someone (causing life altering consequences and chilul Hashem) without contacting ANY of the parties.
Let's stick to 🤡 ing around. Unless that's actually what you're trying to do here.
English

@sshaf91 Ah, very good
It's because he's committed to using a fake Beis Din in Monsey.
Have a great Shabbos!
x.com/imrayphee/stat…
Imray Phee@ImrayPhee
@VaadHaBadchanim This sounds fishy... did he explain why he wouldn't give you the psak? You can reach out to Bais Din Mishpat HaTorah, they thoroughly investigated this
English

You’re right. No one should ever take the Vaad HaBadchanim seriously.
We’re just frum Twitter clowns with a logo.
But this was never about whether people should take us seriously. It was about whether people should take an agunah seriously.
So why did we get involved?
🧵
Anony Mouse@__I_l_l__l
@VaadHaBadchanim It's important that we take the vaad habadchanim super seriously you guys
English

@aBurningbush @VaadHaBadchanim If a Dayan is so confident that he doesnt need to contact the parties, nor have an appeal process.... he might be the bad one.
GIF
English

@VaadHaBadchanim Many Great points.
I'm just trying to figure out how we decided that one Bais Din is the "good one" and the other the "bad one"?
English

@VaadHaBadchanim The people who assign the term "agunah" to women who initiate and continue pursuing contested divorces are the ones turning "agunah" into a punchline.
Please stop.
English

@VaadHaBadchanim What is your chayev legaresh ruling based on?
Please stop, you don't know what you are talking about or doing.
English

@VaadHaBadchanim Did you ask R' Willig when he contacted the parties? He didn’t.
Did you ask him if he has jurisdiction over their lives? He doesn’t.
Is there an appeal process in case he makes an error? There isn’t
This is an excuse to bully and virtue signal. It’s the Free Palestine playbook
English

@gr8fulmother @HEXas_ranger None of us on the panel talked about our personal divorce details.
English

@ImrayPhee @HEXas_ranger Why would you go on a podcast to talk about divorce if it's so private
English

@FiveTownersLove Yes, the topic of there was a letter in support of a pedophile, but the point is that it's common practice for rabbis at that institution to sign proclamations without knowing what they are signing.
English

@ImrayPhee This unfortunate thing is entirely different issue that is not comparable in the slightest. The BDA (where Rav Willig heads the beis din) dealt with YOUR case. YOU have the ability to make this all stop by giving a gett so you can *BOTH* move on with your lives!
English

@HEXas_ranger There's a clear legal and halachic process, and I have always followed it. There are ways to do it faster if the parties can reach agreements on some or all things, but we've sadly not taken many shortcuts.
English

@ImrayPhee Is your wife at least specifically aware of your exact reasoning? Like is it very clear to her what she would theoretically need to do in order to get the get and she just does not want to do that. Or it’s more like there’s nothing she could do at this point.
English

@natanmywatch_ DM me and let me know who I'm chatting with and I'll share more of what I can, that I would prefer not posting publicly. Willig definitely did not know about the case in June 2023, after the date of "his" siruv. If he did sign it, it would raise questions of why, and why no psak
English

@ImrayPhee You're saying just bc something appears to be so doesn't mean it is. But you provide no proof that Rav Willig doesn't know the facts. Also, docusign saves your signature for you to use in the future, occams razor suggests that's why the signatures are identical rather than fraud
English

@natanmywatch_ You can DM me and let me know who I'm talking to if you want more specifics. I will not share everything on Twitter, but I do want to try to be as open and clear as I can with regard to the debunked "siruv", and the improprieties I discovered at @Beth_Din
English

@natanmywatch_ Rav Mordechai Willig would not sign a siruv against a defendant in secular court, certainly not without providing a psak. When asked about this case shortly after the date on the siruv, he was entirely unaware of it. I later learned that his signature is used by many others.
English

@ImrayPhee One more time...TWO DIFFERENT BDA ADMINS HAVE CONFIRMED THAT THIS IS ACCURATE AND RABBI WILLIG KNOWS ABOUT IT.
English

@HEXas_ranger Not publicly. It's a very private matter, and there are far more exciting things on social media. I am trying not to comment, except to keep it from getting more out of control, and going forward more generally, to work toward making critical fixes to our laws and systems
English

@ImrayPhee Are you willing to share your side of things and your reasoning for doing what you're doing? or have you previously done that before and can send a link?
English

Sometimes, rabbis at that same institution have had to admit that they operate in this way and apologized, in the face of public pressure.
theyeshivaworld.com/news/liveblogs…
English