Elm_Mitch
29.6K posts

Elm_Mitch
@Independent74PA
48 year old gen x, want to see if anything positive comes from this. Did not vote trump, or Biden





Not a single Republican is arguing why Trump is innocent, they know he's guilty, they just think he should get away with it.

There was a time when you would have stared in the face of these Trump prosecutions and called them gross stretches of criminal statutes, applied to one person for the sole purpose of destroying his presidential candidacy. Now, however, you're a partisan hack jumping on the "clicks for cash" bandwagon. Fuck off, professor.

@DGrayTexas45 @acnewsitics Making false statements for HELOC for Trump, payments for silence for prez candidate but yeah, nothing at all associated with Trump. Con and lazy.



If Biden is responsible for this, why was Michael Cohen charged, convicted and jailed for his role in these crimes DURING the Trump administration? And this is how dumb you MAGAs are.

BREAKING: Grocery and gas prices continue to decrease. Thanks, President Biden.

If someone doesn’t come from a family that can write a big tuition check, they should still be able to continue their education after high school without getting crushed by debt. I will keep fighting to put higher education within reach for all and cancel student debt.

The real judicial scandal isn't the Alitos' flag. The real scandal is the Supreme Court slow walking the Trump immunity case, and Judge Cannon stalling the classified documents case. The scandal isn't what a judge is flying at home; the scandal is what they're doing as judges.

Future Senator Adam Schiff is spot on




BREAKING: The jury is now deliberating whether or not Donald Trump committed election interference crimes. Just a reminder, President Biden isn’t under investigation for any crimes. Don’t tell me the two candidates are the same.



This violates every principle of the Due Process Clause and criminal process known to man. (Or of the Privileges & Immunities Clause according to Justice Thomas's view.) 1) Merchan's approach violates fair notice. And it's not remotely fair notice to tell a criminal defendant -- the jury can pick and choose its own crime. 2) It violates jury unanimity. Judge Merchan needs to acquaint himself with Ramos v. Louisiania from the U.S. Supreme Court. Maybe he missed it but it is four years old at this point. The issue at this point is not whether Judge Merchan has jumped the shark but how many sharks he's jumped. It's already past the point of absurdity. cc: @wademiller






