Maggie

@JaredsJacket @USATODAY People taking it for pain didn't get addicted.

@Infidel_M04A @USATODAY OxyContin was marketed as a breakthrough. Pain relief that wasn’t addictive. Which was a lie. How are they punished? They paid billions and fines, but still made billions in profit.

May 1 marks the first payment of billions to try to address ongoing harms from the overdose crisis. usatoday.com/story/news/nat…

@USATODAY These product have been on the market since the 50's why an opioid "epidemic" now

@JaredsJacket @USATODAY These product have been on the market since the 50's why an opioid "epidemic" now

@USATODAY This company basically murdered tens of thousands of people Alpha profit. And not one of the executives has spent a minute in jail. How are they any different than the drug dealer on the street corner?

@Blacksword011 Why Lie? The Ford Motor Company was incorporated on June 16, 1903, Patterson-Greenfield automobile debuted in 1915

@Suzierizzo1 He got justice

Who agrees Alex Pretti and his family deserve Justice?👇👇

@MonicaHugh39026 @emangiyato Supreme court Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato No, the law before you speak on it

He didn't know that this scene would change his entire life😱

@Laii4lyfe @emangiyato Yes you must be a moron. Supreme court Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato Ladies and gentlemen this is what someone with a low IQ looks like

@ngahakkinen @emangiyato Supreme court ruling Penn v Mimms, pedo

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato Bootlicker stfu

@FrancoBolzoni3 @emangiyato Supreme court says in Penn v Mimms, if the officer tells you to get out you do it, or they can remove you

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato The law must provide additional resources for a negative to leave the car, or in the worst case scenario, provide the most humane way of enforcement for making the person leave the car, this on the other hand, seems really personal, and unnecessary

@owfler0730 Supreme court Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A You sound well read on constitutional law 😅

@JCOSU86 @emangiyato Supreme court says it is Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato Incorrect.

@darius_golf @emangiyato Yes and so does the Supreme court Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato then you don't believe in the constitution libtard

@bop_boop3000 @emangiyato Supreme court says it is Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato thats not the law

@chuck_roberts73 @emangiyato so following the supremum court is fascist, go back to diddling you kids

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato Fuck off, fascist

@TobiasMbonneAlm @emangiyato Supreme court say it is not up for discussion Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato It absolutely is up for discussion. They're called "rights".

@smarsman @emangiyato Supreme court says it is Penn v Mimms

@emangiyato @Infidel_M04A You are not required to by law-depending on what they say. But if you're justifying these actions by the SS, then I pray it happens to you one day so you know what it's like. I'm white & had this happen to me a long time ago for no reason. Tore up my car, face in dirt, then left.

@_9_Lives @emangiyato Supreme court says it is Penn v Mimms

@Infidel_M04A @emangiyato False

@emangiyato @_9_Lives Supreme court says it is Penn v Mimms

@_9_Lives @Infidel_M04A why(

@Shotanny1 @emangiyato He will, a 6x6 cell. If an officer tells you to get out you have to, it is not up for discussion.

@emangiyato Hope he gets justice