ibag.eth | 747.eth

....what if....we all just dont sell?

@BlackstarXXI Honestly, based 😹

I think nagamigos might be the most annoying nft community on X

@PaxAeterna Based - God bless you and your son on his academic journey

Had a call with my son’s loan advisor at the University of Oklahoma, which I swear is a paid commission role to get young adults into high % loans. I just said screw it. I’ll lend him the money at 0%. No way am I signing him up for those crazy loans. Will I ever get it back? Who knows, maybe I will, but what’s money for anyway? All glory to God. Always grateful. 📿✝️🇻🇦🙏

Fair point - I'm making a more direct appeal to the misalignment of people supporting ENS daily on X vs the DAO and how they operate You're correct in their framing though. Discussion board = reality to the DAO while users probably never read it. Two parties talking past eachother

@InflatableBag the gap here isn't pricing, it's that ENS governance happens on the forum before it ever reaches an onchain vote. by the time holders see the proposal, the framing is set. that's where the squatter narrative hardened. s4l.ai/r/9smankj2

Why did I buy another 3 digit ENS? It's been an outright embarrassing week (actually a few years) for the ENS DAO. They are looking to increase prices on 5 character domains when they've spent years disparaging holders/collectors as "squatters" and making core protocol decisions around punishing squatters and domain price hikes instead of user adoption. This has led to adoption falling off a cliff over the past 6 months and sentiment being as low as I've ever seen. Most believers are just jaded against the dao, and the dao refuses to confront it's believers telling them how poorly they're doing I've been through enough cycles to see a bottom, especially when you can't envision things getting better ever again. We are here. Right now. The dao continues to goof off with proposals about price increases and eliminating grace period which are two things the community has never asked for. It shows the daos intentions are for dao sustainability, and not PMF and adoption of good technology. Which is idiotic bc, the tech is exactly what this world is on the precipice of needing. The agentic economy is just starting to move its first mile, and the domain space (and much more) of the agentic economy will become ENS. This is why the core aim of the dao should be around adoption. Incentivize and value holders to get the flywheel moving on good technology. So why did I buy this domain? Well it's simple, it's one of the few NFTs with legitimate utility and quantifiable scarcity. It's the shortest domain size (3 character), using digits (the only characters that are on every keyboard and the same in every language globally), with a max supply of 1000. Plus palindromes make for some of the easiest domains to remember; they're the same both forward and backwards. Please read @VitalikButerin tweets or literature on 3 and 4 character ENS domains and his judgement on their value (spoiler: he thinks they'll become some of the most valuable real estate on Ethereum) And the fact that 242.eth previously sold for over 45 eth...yes I'll take my chances here at this price point "Buy when there is blood in the streets". Well I see a lot of blood (via both price and sentiment). See you guys back at 7.5 eth floor...which we had 9 months ago. @ENS999club

Pulling up to my critical design review with a Steve Novak jersey on 😹 KNICKS IN 6

🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽🗽

@boldndotcom @unofficialmfers Based mfer Welcome home man - good taste with this punk rock 3D mfer 🤝

Just bought this @unofficialmfers NFT. Started with NFTs in 2021. What a ride. Seen and witnessed and been through a lot. If asked today which projects are worth investing in, I’d have a hard time answering. Obviously, Cryptopunks are kings, but I’m not dropping 70k on one. I respect the history and collection though. BAYC have their rightful place and will likely do well long term, but I’m not interested enough to drop 18k on one. Penguins are champions and will do very well, but a lot of that is priced in imo and I’m not interested in the artwork enough to pfp it and I’m not dropping 10k on something I won’t pfp. Azuki’s look doesn’t interest me either, but they might have the best entry price and upside right now. Those are some of the blue chips. There are others, but I just don’t find much interesting anymore. Doesn't mean there isn't. This is just where I'm currently at. The few NFT projects I do find interesting are some older gems that I think would be cool to have as collectibles. Nothing new interests me and there's just better places and ways to invest my energy, time, and money. I'm still very supportive of the Plague ecosystem and truly want success for the entire community. The Galactic Geckos are my top Solana NFT choice. I do a disservice to the community in some ways because they’re one of the best I’ve witnessed and I’m more of a lone wolf. I support them 100% though. I think Less Than Three (LT3) has a ton of potential and I like the positivity they bring to the space. I want Bearish to succeed as well. Hard working people behind that project. I like the art of CryptoMories, the uniqueness of Wonky Stonks, the idea behind Hen House, and the wholesome goals of Nippy and Frensville. But ultimately, my path led to this mfer. I've wanted one for a long time, but never grabbed one for some reason. That just changed though. Today, I'm a mfer. And I don’t care about the floor price, the roadmap or lack thereof, or if I lose the money forever, because in the end, this mfer and what it represents in this space full of mfers now makes the most sense to this mfer. Time to focus on what I want to be doing going forward while also accumulating, stacking sats, adding to my core holdings, and having fun with my satellite portfolio. No ties. No strings. No BS. Just a mfer doing what a mfer does.

only six 3d stick figs in the shop. and all of them look cool and are free apparently

why i am so bullish on crypto, in "defense of the ideological"- i recently watched the video of the first public appearance for jensen and elon together, which was at GTC 2015 more than ten years ago. by this time, jensen had already made his iconoclastic bet on parallel graphics processing for over twenty years, and on CUDA since 2006. musk had his hassabis moment in 2012. yet openAI was not yet founded (would be ~9 months later), and GDX-1 would be announced at GTC the following year too this is that narrow window where a revolution is visible to some but not others, in which both of these geniuses had early inklings of recognizing AIs pervasive potential, but the broad public was not yet made aware. it would take another 10 years for it reach mainstream applications of course i broadly think of the crypto industry being the same place today. just as there were brilliant minds who understood the revolution that would come from the GPU paradigm, there was simply no large scale consumer demand that required its objective superiority for decades to come. instead, it was picked up by hobbyists (ie gamers) who enjoyed a sense of self-determination by pushing the boundaries of their passion, tinkering, sharing, and researching. in a rather strange way, gamers subsidized AI's development, just like early defi subsidized the institutional tokenization development. during the GTC 2015 interview, elon tells jensen something interesting: the 0-10 mph autonomous driving is very easy to solve because the car can be stopped. the 50+ mph zone is also easy to solve because there are rules of engagements at that speed that dont have as many randomness. the hardest part to solve is actually the 10-50mph, what i call the "the middle game" where a car in an urban setting with bikes, children, cones, manholes, create all kinds of need for precision and speed that sensors today need to develop further. it's fundamentally solvable, but this is the most challenging portion of fulfilling the dreams of autonomous driving this is where crypto is today. the 0-10mph was easy because people can understand why permissionless money is useful from a practical sense to start developing. the 50mph+ will also be really easy because by that point, onchain capital markets is going to be so obvious that you could never go back with all the benefits of self custody, capital efficiency, money velocity/rest optimizations. but its the 10-50 thats hard, where money in a pre-internet financial infrastructure is hitting AML/KYC, offshore capital conduits, discretionary bank risk models, lagging reporting regimes create all kinds of need of need for precision and speed that institutional infrastructure today needs to develop further. its fundamentally solvable, but this is the most challenging portion of fulfilling the dreams of onchain capital markets i love bitcoin. but contrary to some opinion, i believe its possible to love crypto too, because bitcoin is a monetary experiment enabled by the evolution of technology, while most of crypto is the inverse: a technology experiment enabled by the evolution of money. they are fundamentally solving different problems, though rooted in one ideal: to make its access as much of a public good as possible this is why crypto is going to be such an important force for the future during this "narrow window" for those can can see it. and while most early pioneers got into the game because of the ideology behind decentralization, it's time to admit that the winning ideology is technological financialization: it is hyperfinancialization with elements of decentralization that exports sovereign finance as a public good, decentralizes agentic rails for humanity as a public good, promote self-determination as a public good. this is worth fighting for, and im excited to recommit my focus to these ideals that began my crypto journey. this "middle game" period will be remembered as the most critical juncture for the industry and for anyone who is doubting the industry at this time, i hope reading this helps you reanchor your beliefs for what you are actually fighting for, and more importantly, know that you can play a meaningful part in the revolution too the future belongs to those who recognized it was always ideological

@MontiMania @v0punk classic grift

The V0 Punks could be a huge runner. • OG Punk traits • Classic Nakamigos look • Reimagined Meebits gear They were a free mint. Team is shipping. Dev is based. This is culture.

@slimsonnn gmfer

gm mfers☀️

You can find the @Nakamigos of the everyday @beeple here ⬇️ weareallnakamigos.art

for those keeping track at home

+2 Beeple Nakamigos

@jhyanstrudel Insane 4 stack my god 😵‍💫

Bring back NFTs

~600k frogs --> 17k frogs --> ?? Deeper into the pond I go.

@VitalikButerin @codek_tv big dawg imma need a couple less autistic math proof tweets from you and a couple more bullposts about the ethereum token that has been anemic for over a half decade

Proof: [Lemma] sum(i=1..x) [degree n-1 polynomial] = [degree n polynomial] Proof of lemma: * Notice that x^n - (x-1)^n = x^n - x^n + nx^(n-1) - ... +- 1 = [degree n-1 polynomial, call it C(x)] * Hence by telescoping sums, sum(i=1..x) C(i) = x^n * Given any specific degree n-1 polynomial D(x), re-express it as D(x) = some k * C(x) + [deg <= n-2 stuff]. By induction on n, and by linearity, sum(1..x)D(i) = k * x^n + [deg <= n-1 stuff]. Therefore, sum(i=1...x) i^3 is degree 4, and (sum(i=1...x) i)^2 is degree 2*2 = 4. Now, explicitly evaluate (sum(i=1...x) i)^2 and sum(i=1...x) i^3 on x=1...5, answers are: 1, 9, 36, 100, 225 in both cases The two deg-4 polynomials are the same on five points, therefore they are equal Therefore sqrt(sum(i=1...x) i^3) = sum(i=1...x)