Raúl F. Proaño P.

1.7K posts

Raúl F. Proaño P. banner
Raúl F. Proaño P.

Raúl F. Proaño P.

@InfoZIFS

Analista de Legislación y Desarrollo Comunitario | Editor | Proyecto PI basado en la creatividad y gestión de derecho autoral.

Quito Ecuador Katılım Kasım 2021
112 Takip Edilen70 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Raúl F. Proaño P.
Raúl F. Proaño P.@InfoZIFS·
🏹 🚀 🎖️ #Geopolítica, #PAZciencia y ... dossier sobre: * #OperaciónFuriaÉpica e, * #IranIsraelUSAWar. Para comprender la estrategia de Seguridad Hemisférica; y consensuar un enfoque a lo interno de la #CoaliciónUxD 🇪🇨
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧@WarMonitor3

Iran Update/My Opinion On Where It Is All Going: After 6 weeks of non stop bombing of Iran by combined Israeli and American strikes conducing tens of thousands of Sorties, significant damage has been done to the Iranian military in particular its air defence capabilities, airforce and navy. Negotiations have appeared fruitless despite a recent ceasefire due to the incompatibility of two approaches Iran fundamentally is continuing to not give up nuclear enrichment and is now wanting full control over the strait of Hormuz to charge hundreds of billions in shipping fees to fund its military expansionism, I do not see diplomatic solutions working, and see this conflict restarting pretty quickly. Militarily Iran maintains Its ballistic missile launcher capacities only have being limited by half, the rest have been buried in deep underground complexes and likely are able to be recovered with Iran still posing a threat to the Gulf with remaining capabilities. In terms of its nuclear programme, this is unfortunately still in tact with a lot of enriched uranium and other enriching sites being hidden deep underground at buried facilities, hard to reach with current munitions available, strikes did manage to assassinate more high level scientists and take out facilities that were involved in enriching uranium but on this side more is too be done. Irans command and control structure initially severely damaged by precision strikes has largely kept intact due to its decentralised nature, Iran is able to continue firing back despite not direct command being available. Iran has also been able to maintain control over the strait of Hormuz mainly by launching sea based strike drones and shore launched shoot and scoot anti ship missile capacity. Iran has used the recent ceasefire to transfer more manpower and capability to the shores surrounding the straits to better hold it. Interestingly Iranian key island hubs like Kharg Island have been severely reinforced in anticipation of a US ground raid, but these defences were severely softened up by a large row of target airstrikes. US forces continue to build massive capacity in the region, including bringing an additional carrier strike group which has reached the med making that three in the region as well as massively building up ground troops, transferring thousands of marines, artillery soldiers, this does suggest that preparations are being made to invade islands around the strait of Hormuz. Notably over the last few days an uptick in military cargo flights to the Middle East has occurred as well as a renewed arming of strategic bombers which are stationed in RAF FAIRFORD in Britain with tankers damaged in the Middle East being rotated out for undamaged ones from bases on the US Mainland. Finally the US navy is moving to secure the strait of Hormuz by blockading Iranian exports, this will be done by frigates and destroyers like actively preventing ships moving from Iranian ports, attempting to economically strangle Iran, if this does not work I think group operations will follow. US navy destroyers yesterday tested this in practise by conducting freedom of navigation runs around the strait likely looking for mines, the conclusion was likely at the moment the strait is just too dangerous to secure actively with ships, much easier would it be to wait for them to leave to seize or board them. MY OPINION: I just simply do not see a diplomatic resolution to this conflict at this stage, Iran believes it has the upper hand with its renewed control of the strait of Hormuz it fundamentally is now denying to give up the nuclear weapons and its ballistic programme that started the war in the first place despite all teh strikes on it. The US simply cannot walk away despite its military victories clearly it would not have achieved any of its strategic objectives, this leads me to believe the war will start again with the goal of at least opening the strait of Hormuz. First the US will strike Iranian energy, in a way to get them to capitulate to non nuclear proliferation, if that does not work they will start interdicting ships, if that does not work I think they will try to seize Kharg Island and maybe other islands around the strait of Hormuz, unfortunately to me diplomacy is Cleary out the window, positions are just way to far away, especially with the new extreme leadership. Washington has to sell a victory to its domestic audience, walking away now would be a fundamental failure, although in some ways it may be a better option considering Iran could drag this war on for months affecting mid term elections in America even. I only see escalation moving forward, I hope I am wrong. WM

Español
0
2
2
48
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Antonella Gil Betancourt
Antonella Gil Betancourt@antonellasgb·
⚖️ #DerechoAdministrativo y #Arbitraje 📝 Si el convenio arbitral indica que las partes podrán someter las controversias derivadas del contrato administrativo a arbitraje ¿aquello genera incompetencia de la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa? ⬇️ Aquí lo que ha dicho la 🟠#SalaAdministrativaCNJ en sentencia de mayoría y una síntesis del voto salvado. 🗞️ Para acceder a novedades así ➡️ Suscripción gratuita al #BoletínLegalDerechos: 🔗derechos.ec/boletin-legal/
Antonella Gil Betancourt tweet media
Español
2
30
71
2.3K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Dr. M.F. Khan
Dr. M.F. Khan@Dr_TheHistories·
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Ukraine suddenly found itself in possession of the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal. Thousands of nuclear warheads were stationed on its territory, along with the missiles and bombers capable of delivering them. For a newly independent country still finding its footing, this placed Ukraine in a powerful but complicated position on the global stage. By 1994, Ukraine agreed to give up these weapons under what became known as the Budapest Memorandum. In exchange, it received assurances from Russia, the United States, and the United Kingdom that its sovereignty, independence, and borders would be respected. The agreement was not a full defense treaty but rather a political commitment, built on the idea that reducing nuclear weapons would make the world safer overall. Over the following years, Ukraine transferred its nuclear warheads to Russia and dismantled its delivery systems, fully denuclearizing by 1996. What makes this decision widely discussed today is how those assurances played out later. The agreement did not include strict enforcement mechanisms, and its interpretation remains a subject of debate. What is clear is that Ukraine’s choice stands as one of the most significant examples of voluntary nuclear disarmament in modern history, showing both the hopes and the limitations of international guarantees. #drthehistories
Dr. M.F. Khan tweet media
English
1
14
55
6.8K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
@IsraelVive
@IsraelVive@IsraelVive1948·
En una era en la que las personas esperan victorias decisivas y rápidas, debemos comprender que, aunque las cosas pueden cambiar en la superficie, lo hacen a su propio ritmo. En lo que respecta a Israel, ya podemos identificar logros significativos después de más de 40 días de guerra: 1. Apalancamiento de Ormuz: Irán ha quemado su carta estratégica más fuerte para los próximos 50 años y ha perdido su capacidad efectiva de amenazar las rutas de comercio global. 2. Oleoductos de bypass: Activación del oleoducto saudí y desarrollo del puerto de Fujairah en los EAU como rutas de exportación que ya no dependen de los caprichos de Teherán. 3. Infraestructura energética: Un golpe fatal a la dependencia del gas del Golfo a través de la rápida aprobación de 11 plantas de gas en Texas e instalaciones de GNL en el Golfo de México, junto con el llamado de Trump al mundo para que compre petróleo y gas estadounidenses. 4. Renacimiento nuclear: Un retorno importante de Europa y Asia (Japón y Corea del Sur) a la energía nuclear como una alternativa estable y estratégica al petróleo iraní. 5. Erosión del veto de Hezbolá: Un cambio hacia el compromiso directo con el gobierno y el ejército libaneses, evitando a Hezbolá como el único poder intermediario en el terreno. 6. Aislamiento de la Hermandad Musulmana: Un colapso parcial de la influencia de Qatar y Turquía en las capitales europeas y en Washington. 7. Expone la estafa de Qatar: Se revela la vulnerabilidad de Qatar, ya que se vio obligado a pagar a Irán para proteger sus instalaciones de gas (Ras Laffan). 8. Eje India-EAU: Fortalecimiento de una alianza estratégica que desplaza el centro de gravedad económico de Teherán al corredor Nueva Delhi-Abu Dhabi-Haifa. 9. Presión sobre Pakistán: Pakistán ha sido arrinconado, enfrentando demandas de pago de miles de millones de dólares en deuda de Arabia Saudita y los EAU tras su apoyo a Irán. 10. Alineación del Pentágono: Un nivel sin precedentes de cooperación entre las FDI y el establecimiento de defensa de EE. UU., formando un activo estratégico a largo plazo. 11. Independencia energética regional: Uso de los campos de gas israelíes (Leviatán y Karish) como apalancamiento para estabilizar los regímenes de Egipto y Jordania bajo la presión iraní. 12. Disuasión tecnológica: Demostración de la superioridad de la inteligencia israelí en penetrar y llevar a cabo operaciones de precisión en las ubicaciones más seguras de Irán. 13. Mejorado paisaje estratégico: Una nueva realidad de seguridad en la que Irán, Hamas y Hezbolá son significativamente más débiles que en la víspera de la guerra. ( Eliyahu Ben Asher)
@IsraelVive tweet media
Español
3
35
97
2.9K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Read the Trump tweet posted by the White House just while ago on April 13. Read it again. Then read what it actually does. “Iran’s Navy is laying at the bottom of the sea, completely obliterated, 158 ships. What we have not hit are their small number of, what they call, ‘fast attack ships,’ because we did not consider them much of a threat. Warning: If any of these ships come anywhere close to our BLOCKADE, they will be immediately ELIMINATED, using the same system of kill that we use against the drug dealers on boats at Sea. It is quick and brutal. P.S. 98.2% of Drugs coming into the U.S. by Ocean or Sea have STOPPED!” Five sentences. Four separate strategic architectures compressed into a single post. The first architecture is military deterrence. 158 Iranian naval vessels destroyed. The number is a message to every IRGC fast-attack boat captain still afloat: your fleet is gone and you survived because we chose not to kill you. That choice is revocable. The second architecture is legal reframing. A sovereign port blockade is an act of war under international law. Drug interdiction at sea is law enforcement. By invoking “the same system of kill that we use against the drug dealers,” Trump reclassified the blockade from military operation to law enforcement extension. The rules of engagement trained on cocaine speedboats in the Caribbean are now authorized for the Persian Gulf. The War Powers Act constrains combat operations. Drug interdiction protocols run under separate legal authority. The framing is not rhetorical. It is jurisdictional. The third architecture is domestic political armor. In a single postscript, Trump welded the blockade to the drug war. The same naval assets enforcing Hormuz port isolation are credited with stopping 98.2 percent of ocean-borne narcotics. Any member of Congress who questions the blockade must explain why they oppose an operation that stopped maritime drug trafficking. The blockade is no longer a Middle East entanglement. It is a domestic security triumph with an Iran component. The fourth architecture is precedent. If the United States can reframe a sovereign port blockade as law enforcement, any great power can do the same. China can blockade Taiwan as “anti-smuggling.” Russia can interdict Baltic shipping as “narcotics enforcement.” The legal fiction requires only domestic authorization and a fleet large enough to enforce it. The template is live. And beneath all four layers sits the collision with the IRGC’s Bitcoin toll system that no enforcement architecture addresses. The toll operates regardless of the blockade because it clears before the ship reaches the interdiction zone. The IRGC’s wallet receives BTC seconds after the vessel emails its cargo manifest. By the time the ship approaches the blockade, the payment has already been laundered through OTC brokers in Dubai into yuan via CIPS. Destroying the ship after the toll is paid means the IRGC collects revenue from a vessel that the US Navy then eliminates. The toll system profits from the blockade. The blockade cannot reach the toll. And the “system of kill” destroys the ship but not the transaction that funded the enemy before the ship arrived. Five sentences from the White House. Four enforcement architectures. One gap that no warship, no law, and no tweet can close. The commander-in-chief has built the most decisive maritime enforcement posture since the Cuban Missile Crisis. The IRGC has built a payment system that sits outside it. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
23
25
92
18.6K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·
Reza Pahlavi has landed in Stockholm with a warning: The Islamic regime is not only a threat to the people of Iran but also a threat to security here in Sweden! He confirms what Säpo has already been confirmed: The regime operates on Swedish soil through criminal organizations. Yet the response from our elected officials is weak! Pahlavi wishes: -That Sweden stands on the side of the Iranian people, for real. -That the regime's ambassador is expelled immediately. -That we are preparing to work with a future transitional government. Pahlavi will make a speech in Parliament tomorrow Monday and his supporters will gather in the Kungsträdgården, where the speech will be broadcast on TV screens. The security order is large and the police have made extensive preparations for the visit. But what does the reception look like when he visits Parliament? Despite Pahlavi presenting a detailed rescue plan "Iran Prosperity Project" for the first 180 days of freedom, only the Christian Democrats and the Swedish Democrats dare welcome him. Where’s the rest at? Where are those parties that talk about human rights and democracy daily? Their silence gives a clear message about where they actually stand when it matters. It’s a total betrayal to all those who fight and die for a free and democratic Iran. Pahlavi is clear: He is ready to sacrifice his life for freedom. He fights even for his former opponents, because he knows that the goal is greater than the individual. It's time to choose a side: Do we stand with the oppressors in Tehran, or do we stand with the people who sacrifice everything for their freedom?
Imtiaz Mahmood tweet mediaImtiaz Mahmood tweet media
English
19
133
488
9.6K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Xavier Bonilla (BONIL)
Xavier Bonilla (BONIL)@bonilcaricatura·
Me siento emocionado, ilusionado y entusiasmado en esta nueva casa: @Primicias Una nueva etapa para reencontrarnos. Por eso hice este video. ¡Sube el volumen! Letra, dibujos y edición: BONIL. Musicalización: IA
Español
221
667
2.9K
75.5K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Rohoza (Дев'ятий) Mykhailo 🇺🇦🇱🇹🇨🇦
Intelligence has revealed shocking information regarding the “peace deal”: Trump’s agreement has changed dramatically, and now, in addition to Donbas, other regions have also appeared in it. Putin seems to have realized that the U.S. president is willing to accept any terms just to end the war, seized the opportunity, and added new conditions. Ukraine has been presented with a fait accompli.
Rohoza (Дев'ятий) Mykhailo 🇺🇦🇱🇹🇨🇦 tweet media
English
26
63
226
40.5K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
HispaniaPlusUltra
HispaniaPlusUltra@AsoHispaniaPlus·
El virreinato de Nueva Granada se desgajó del de Perú en las Reales Audiencias de Quito, Panamá y Santa Fe y la capitanía general de Venezuela.  Integraron su extensión los territorios hoy de Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela y Panamá, con capital Santa Fe de Bogotá.  1717 a ~1819
HispaniaPlusUltra tweet media
Español
9
50
180
5K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
On April 12, the same day the Islamabad talks collapsed after 21 hours and Trump announced a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a crowd in Ankara: “Just as we entered Libya and Karabakh, we can enter Israel. There is no reason not to do it.” He added: “Had Pakistan not been mediating in the war between the US and Iran, we would have shown Israel its place.” A NATO ally since 1952 just threatened to invade the country that NATO’s most powerful member is blockading a strait to protect. Turkey is in the same alliance as the United States. Israel is the United States’ closest partner in the Middle East. And Erdogan announced on a global stage that the only thing preventing Turkish military action against Israel is the mediation role of Pakistan, which hosted peace talks that failed twelve hours earlier. There is no Turkish military mobilization. There are no troop movements. There are no naval deployments toward the Eastern Mediterranean. Erdogan’s Libya intervention in 2019 was a proxy operation supporting the Government of National Accord with drones and advisers. His Karabakh reference is to Turkey’s support for Azerbaijan in 2020 and 2023, also proxy and air-supported. Neither was a direct ground invasion of a state with a modern air force, missile defense systems, nuclear ambiguity, and the full backing of the American military. The threat is rhetorical. The threat is also the most explicit statement of military intent by a NATO member against a US-aligned partner since Turkey’s 1974 Cyprus operation. Netanyahu responded by calling Erdogan the “Hitler of our time.” Israel’s ambassador to the UN called the statement “a declaration of intent by a NATO member.” No official US response has been issued as of April 13. But the timing is the story. On April 12, five things happened within twelve hours. The Islamabad talks collapsed. Trump announced the Hormuz blockade. Erdogan threatened to invade Israel. Iran’s embassy in Ghana posted that Vance “flew home empty-handed” and said “Iran said a BIG NO.” And Araghchi announced he would seek talks with Europeans in Berlin, Paris, and London, bypassing the United States entirely. Five escalations or pivots on the same day. The peace architecture that took a week to build disintegrated in a single Saturday. The mediator’s country (Pakistan) is being praised for trying. The ceasefire broker (China) is preparing MANPADs for the country it helped bring to the table. The NATO ally hosting US bases (Turkey) is threatening the country those bases indirectly support. The country that refused to join the war (Spain) is in Beijing. And the country that started the war (the United States) is now blockading the strait it spent six weeks trying to open. Every actor is moving in a direction that makes the next actor’s position harder to hold. Turkey’s threat forces the US to choose between NATO solidarity and Israeli security. Iran’s Europe pivot forces Vance’s “final offer” into competition with softer European terms. China’s MANPAD delivery forces the US to confront the country that brokered the only pause in fighting. And Trump’s blockade forces every toll-paying nation, including the mediator Pakistan, to choose between Iranian coordination and American interdiction. The war is no longer between two countries. It is between every alliance, every institution, and every assumption about how the world is organized. And it is all happening faster than any single government can process. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
42
134
365
61.6K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·
TRUMP JUST MADE 5 MOVES IN 48 HOURS. And nobody is connecting the dots. MOVE 1: Signed executive order threatening 25% TARIFFS on any country trading with Iran. Target: China. India. Turkey. The petrodollar stranglehold is ENDING. MOVE 2: Threatened to SUE his own Federal Reserve nominee if he doesn't lower rates. "It was a joke." No. It was a WARNING. The Fed's days are numbered. MOVE 3: Pentagon CUT ALL TIES with Harvard. Military training. Fellowships. Programs. ALL GONE. The Ivy League pipeline to power is DEAD. MOVE 4: Launched TrumpRx. 43 medications. Ozempic included. Big Pharma's monopoly: BROKEN. They charged you $1,000. He's giving it for $300. MOVE 5: DHS funding expires February 13th. 6 days from now. Controlled shutdown incoming. Why? Because you can't RESTRUCTURE what's still running. Connect the dots: Iran tariffs = END of petrodollar Fed threat = END of central banking control Harvard cut = END of Deep State recruitment TrumpRx = END of Big Pharma monopoly DHS shutdown = RESTRUCTURING of homeland security This isn't chaos. This is a DEMOLITION. Piece by piece. System by system. Pillar by pillar. The old world is being dismantled in REAL TIME. And the new one is being built while you watch. 🔺 DARK TO LIGHT 🔺 - @WWG1WGA_QQ
English
52
398
1.4K
105.9K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Academia Ecuatoriana de la Lengua
El 12 de abril de 1844 nació don Federico González Suárez, arzobispo de Quito entre 1905 y 1917. Ingresó a la Academia Ecuatoriana de la Lengua en 1890, pero renunció a la dignidad. Volvió a ingresar en 1908 y fue miembro activo hasta su muerte.
Academia Ecuatoriana de la Lengua tweet media
Español
0
2
0
41
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Lectócratas
Lectócratas@lectocratas·
📖 El concepto de lo político — Carl Schmitt (1932) DESCARGA GRATUITA dokumen.pub/el-concepto-de… Introducción "Lo político se define así sin referencia específica a objeto alguno; aparece como una relación que se caracteriza meramente por su intensidad, en último extremo por la posibilidad de que en ella se llegue al uso de la coacción, de la fuerza." 🧵1/8
Lectócratas tweet media
Español
2
105
267
8.9K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@PsyGuy007·
🚨🇱🇻 LA LETTONIE DÉFIE BRUXELLES ! La ministre des Affaires étrangères Baiba Braže vient de lâcher une bombe : « La Lettonie N’ACCEPTERA AUCUN nouveau migrant du pacte UE et NE PAIERA PAS les 20 000 € par migrant réclamés par Bruxelles ! » On protège nos frontières, pas nos impôts pour financer l’immigration imposée. Souveraineté nationale 1 – Dictature de quotas 0 🇱🇻🔥 Un ❤️ si tu soutiens la Lettonie‼️
Wolf 🐺 tweet media
Français
2.1K
15.6K
49.5K
441.2K
Raúl F. Proaño P. retweetledi
José Mario
José Mario@JoseMarioMX·
Los bots de IA no solo están “raspando” noticias: están reescribiendo, por la puerta de atrás, las reglas del Estado de derecho en el ecosistema informativo. Eso significa que un puñado de plataformas extrae en masa contenido protegido, lo explota comercialmente y, al mismo tiempo, hace inviable la “explotación normal” de la obra (publicidad, suscripciones, paywalls), erosionando de facto el contenido esencial del derecho de autor y vaciando de sustancia el derecho a recibir información de fuentes libres y pluralistas. Cuando el modelo de negocio que mantiene vivo al periodismo se rompe por una arquitectura tecnológica opaca y no consensuada, no es solo un problema de innovación: es un problema de legalidad, de límites al poder privado y de quién garantiza que la verdad pública no quede rehén de algoritmos que viven del periodismo… mientras asfixian su base económica.
José Mario tweet media
Español
1
98
138
7.1K