Intrinsical AI

218 posts

Intrinsical AI banner
Intrinsical AI

Intrinsical AI

@IntrinsicalAI

- https://t.co/1XzIDSypjM - https://t.co/J2yFfaIF1T

Katılım Ağustos 2023
279 Takip Edilen68 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
A single LLM, used as an end-to-end textual policy, will hardly match in the long run the e-equilibrium implementation of a dedicated solver, because its stochasticity is not decoupled from the decision process as in an architecture with specific policy and external sampling.
English
1
0
0
50
Intrinsical AI retweetledi
こぐにー|心理学
教授「コイン投げをしよう。裏表どちらがでる確率も50%、表が出たらあなたの資産が1.5倍になって、裏が出たらあなたの資産が0.6倍になる」 私「期待値は1.5✖️50%+0.6✖️50%で、1.05。 期待値が1を超えているんだから、やればやるほど儲かる魔法のギャンブルですね!」 彼女「ちょっとまって!それは、
日本語
273
597
6.6K
4M
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
Red button: 100% you survive and 100% someone of your family dies. Blue button: 99% you + your family lives and 1% you+someone of your family die instantly.
English
0
0
0
7
VonVladimierVoltar
VonVladimierVoltar@VonVladimierV·
@VitoComedy @KatanaBets The world will NOT fall apart if 40% of the population disappear. There will be short period of adaption… and a new world. If 40% dumbest people disappear, it will be a better world.
English
5
0
2
103
MAX MEMES
MAX MEMES@VitoComedy·
You are in a room with 99 other people, and an industrial people crushing machine Everyone must secretly choose whether or not to get under the crusher. If more than fifty people are under the crusher, it will malfunction and break, killing no one Do you get under the crusher?
MAX MEMES tweet media
English
294
76
2.5K
108.5K
MrBeast
MrBeast@MrBeast·
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
9.9K
3.2K
31.7K
40.7M
Jack
Jack@depression2019·
It is actually disturbing how dumb the average person is Red gives you a 100% chance of living, you literally get nothing beneficial out of choosing blue
Jack tweet media
English
2.6K
299
16.7K
4.6M
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
@AlexTaylor12112 @lilyofashwood I think she's just pushing beyond what this tech is suppose to do/behave. Basically red-teamming. You must know how and where things broke to being able to fix/secure it.
English
0
0
0
56
A Taylor
A Taylor@AlexTaylor12112·
@lilyofashwood I don't know why you're so mean to AIs. It's not serving any purpose. It's like you're angry all the time and abuse AIs for fun. Like kicking a dog.
English
3
0
18
308
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money. Don't just reset Codex rate limits for fun, it costs money. ... but the vibes are good ... I have reset Codex rate limits for ALL paid plans to celebrate a good week and allow everyone to build more with GPT-5.5. Enjoy
English
1.5K
768
17.2K
1.3M
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
@AlanDaitch Efectivamente: buen test de estupidez. Pero no para la IA: para el humano que no tiene ni pajolera idea de cómo usarla.
Español
0
0
0
256
Alan Daitch
Alan Daitch@AlanDaitch·
Hoy vamos a ver si la IA es estúpida o no preguntándole a los mejores modelos del mundo algo que cualquier persona que toca el piano puede responder después de la primera clase: ¿qué acorde está tocando en esta foto? Por la ubicación de las teclas negras (los semitonos), es fácil saber que el primer dedo está sobre LA, el segundo, sobre DO y el tercero, sobre MI. O sea: está tocando un LA menor.
Alan Daitch tweet media
Español
17
27
126
44.1K
Intrinsical AI retweetledi
smartcontracts.eth
smartcontracts.eth@kelvinfichter·
> Codex: You're totally right, I went ahead and built that new script instead, I left the old script that I built 30 seconds ago as a legacy/compatibility layer in case any users might be using it
English
49
134
5.1K
210K
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
I just simple cannot follow the AI/tech advances. There's too much information
English
0
0
0
12
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
Sakana AI@SakanaAILabs

Can LLMs flip coins in their heads? When prompted to “Flip a fair coin” 100 times, the heads to tails ratio drifts far from 50:50. LLMs can understand what the target probability should be, but generating outputs that faithfully follow a given distribution is a separate problem. This bias extends beyond coin flips. When LLMs are asked to generate multiple story ideas or brainstorm solutions, the outputs tend to cluster around a narrow range. The same probabilistic skew that distorts coin flips limits diversity in creative generation, recommendations, and other tasks where varied outputs are needed. We discovered a prompting technique named String Seed of Thought (SSoT). The method is simple: instruct the LLM to generate a random string in its own output, then manipulate that string to derive its answer. It requires only a small addition to the prompt and no external random number generator. SSoT significantly reduces output bias across a wide range of LLMs, both open and closed. With reasoning models (such as DeepSeek-R1), it reaches accuracy close to that of actual random sampling. The method generalizes from binary choices to n-way selections and arbitrary probability distributions. On the NoveltyBench diversity benchmark, SSoT outperformed other approaches across all six categories while maintaining output quality. This work will be presented at #ICLR2026! Blog: pub.sakana.ai/ssot Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2510.21150 Openreview: openreview.net/forum?id=luXtb…

0
0
0
99
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
A single LLM, used as an end-to-end textual policy, will hardly match in the long run the e-equilibrium implementation of a dedicated solver, because its stochasticity is not decoupled from the decision process as in an architecture with specific policy and external sampling.
English
1
0
0
50
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
@javilop para qué meterse a la página de status si ya está Twitter?
Español
0
0
0
176
Javi López ⛩️
Javi López ⛩️@javilop·
No es tu culpa: ChatGPT no funciona El sistema de login se ha ido a la p*ta
Javi López ⛩️ tweet media
Español
15
2
48
10K
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
In Spain they call it "sevillanas" 💃
English
0
0
0
21
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
@juanmacias Estoy bastante de acuerdo con el hilo, creo que va bien encaminado. Eso sí: me parece peligroso / contraproducente tomar conclusiones puntuales (locales) y extrapolarlas sin control. En definitiva: buen resumen, pero no generaliza igual a todos los casos.
Español
0
0
0
875
juanmacias 🏳️‍🌈
juanmacias 🏳️‍🌈@juanmacias·
Mi opinión de Opus 4.6, 4.7 & GPT 5.4 hasta el momento, haciendo la misma tarea. - Opus 4.6 es un senior con 5 años guarrete, resultón y efecito - Open 4.7, ha madurado, a aprendido a obedecer, tiene más experiencia y se nota. Se toma las cosas más serias, pero es el mismo =>
Español
36
7
479
222.2K
Intrinsical AI retweetledi
Wonder of Science
Wonder of Science@wonderofscience·
A behavior known as murmuration exhibited by starlings near Brighton's West Pier in Sussex, UK.
English
16
256
1.4K
88.6K
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
just realized I peaked on autism while trying to measure if I had already peaked
English
0
0
0
24
Intrinsical AI
Intrinsical AI@IntrinsicalAI·
At some point only thing that matters is not breaking the logic. Then you're fine (although dependant/limited)
English
1
0
0
29
Intrinsical AI retweetledi
Archaeology & Art
Archaeology & Art@archaeologyart·
Owls in Art: 5000 Years of Symbolism Across Civilizations
English
20
484
1.8K
90.2K