Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸

2.6K posts

Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸 banner
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸

Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸

@InverseLiberal

Atlanta, GA Katılım Mart 2024
92 Takip Edilen158 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
I would say 4-7 After the Maduro raid, @realDonaldTrump got carried away believing his own half-truth “I stopped 8 wars,” leading him to think he’s the one to permanently solve long-lasting world problems. That was the biggest banger for us. This turned the @WhiteHouse into a revolving door for every foreign lobbyist, as @mtgreenee said. - Not following through on many domestic policies, - Letting insurance premiums hike more than 3x without solutions in sight, - Failed tariffs rollout (remember the tariffs to replace income taxes talking point?) and no tariff refund checks, - Stalled deportations, - Epstein scandal / failure to convert Epstein List into Epstein Indictment, - People in orbit getting rich off “Truths” while voters suffer deeply, - Unable to tame inflation, - Nonexistent legislative agenda, - Failed transparency promises (Charlie Kirk, JFK, Aliens, Drones, Butler, and so on). Those are some that have deeply divided the right so far. But I would still vote for him over murderous Kamala followers, and that’s our weakness—being left to pick the lesser of two evils, but evil nonetheless.
Cernovich@Cernovich

If you voted for Trump in the 2024 election, overall how would you rate his current term, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest:

English
0
0
1
42
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@FmrRepMTG It’s time to have a 3rd party at least on the House floor. Even if this party would hold 10 seats, it could still influence the speaker, house rules and hold the line on these bad legislations passed using abusive tactics.
English
0
0
4
174
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
This is remarkable and you should watch this entire video. The House was going to pass a 45 day extension of FISA 702 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act), BY VOICE WITHOUT VOTING, and Thomas Massie courageously forced a debate and demanded a recorded vote. Jim Jordan who has fought FOR warrants for FISA for years ironically led the debate AGAINST warrants and urged a YES vote for a clean extension WITHOUT warrants, which is what Trump is demanding even after FISA was used against him by the Democrats to spy on him and his campaign. Trump literally says give up your rights and just pass it and Jordan won’t go against Trump even though he wants warrant requirements. Chip Roy, Warren Davidson, and Keith Self joined Thomas Massie and made strong cases as to why Congress must add warrant requirements to FISA 702 and why a Central Bank Digital Currency must be banned and how both are powerful tools of control and surveillance and violation of your privacy and liberties. And Jamie Raskin (D) gave compelling arguments as to why bipartisanship is needed in the House to make reforms to FISA 702 yet after doing so he voted YES to a clean 45 day extension of FISA 702 without warrant requirements, which makes no sense. Why demand change and then literally vote for what you just argued against? However never forget under Biden and Democrats FISA 702 was used to spy on hundreds of thousands of Americans. Also, the Republican controlled Senate and its leader John Thune will not vote for a ban on Central Bank Digital Currency, saying it’s dead on arrival in the Senate. And neither will the Democrats. To sum it up, Americans are literally losing our precious privacy and freedoms right now under Trump and Republicans, yet Democrats are no better and have made no major policy changes that caused them to lose in 2024. They are only winning because Trump and Republicans have betrayed the most important campaign promises. 111 members of Congress voted NAY (NO) to the 45 day FISA 702 extension without warrant requirements for Americans so that your government can spy on you. Some voted NO in a partisan manner and because they hate Trump and some voted NO because they truly want change. Either way, those who voted NO should be recognized. Out of 111 ONLY 26 Republicans bravely voted NO. Here is the list of GOP NOs and pictured is the full list of both D’s and R’s who voted NO. Republican NO votes: Begich, Biggs (SC), Boebert, Brecheen, Burchett, Cammack, Cloud, Collins, Crane, Davidson, Downing, Fry, Fulcher, Gosar, Hageman, Harshbarger, Higgins (LA), Kennedy (UT), Luttrell, Massie, Miller (IL), Ogles, Perry, Roy, Self, and Tiffany. But after all this, the House passed the clean 45 day extension of FISA 702. After years of Trump and Republicans campaigning and demanding on Fox News that warrant requirements must be added to FISA, nothing changed. The promises they made to you are broken. The only thing that matters is voting records, none of their words. Words are meaningless puffs of air. If your Representative is not on this list, who voted NO, then you should tell them you are withdrawing your support and not voting for them. On both sides of the aisle. It doesn’t matter anymore whether you vote Republican or Democrat. Behind the veil, they are one and the same. Lastly, KY-4 your Representative Thomas Massie is a giant among men in Congress and fights for you harder than the entire House and Senate combined. Don’t be fools, vote for Thomas Massie!!!
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 tweet media
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie

Today Republicans and Democrats tried to use “unanimous consent” to pass a 45-day extension of warrantless spying on Americans without voting. I did not consent. I was able to force a vote and a debate. I used a rare parliamentary procedure to control half the time. Watch here:

English
472
2.1K
7.7K
447.4K
Martin Shkreli
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli·
one thing ive learned in life is when an albanian woman tells you to do something you fucking do it
English
138
216
5.7K
225.6K
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
*TRUMP: REMOVING SOME WHISKEY TARIFFS AFTER MEETING UK KING
English
40
55
795
66.1K
Amy Klobuchar
Amy Klobuchar@amyklobuchar·
Justice Kagan says it best
Amy Klobuchar tweet media
English
3.2K
3.3K
13.3K
531.4K
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@ggreenwald One difference is that it took several FOIAs, court cases and above all Elon acquiring Twitter to expose what Biden Admin did. Now, we are seeing everything in open.
English
0
0
5
156
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
The White House demanding that a network fire one of its hosts, while taking regulatory action against ABC's corporate parent to pressure, threaten and force them to do so, is an obvious attack on the First Amendment. It's at least as bad as what the Twitter Files showed: the Biden Adm pressuring and threatening social media platforms to ban dissent:
The White House@WhiteHouse

When is ABC Fake News Network firing seriously unfunny Jimmy Kimmel???

English
307
434
2.6K
126.7K
Scott Jennings
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY·
DEM: "We haven’t had an African American Republican governor since reconstruction!" ME: “The Republicans tried to elect one in Virginia.” DEM: “Okay...” 😳 ME: "Then you got a white Democrat who gerrymandered the state! It’s all crumbling, John!"
English
841
7.6K
60.9K
1.6M
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
@GovTimWalz Whats the story? How to brutally defraud your own citizens?
English
287
2K
38.8K
168.2K
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@RoKhanna Hey @grok, as you can see, Ro can’t even admit that the person who killed Joe’s daughter is not supposed to be in the country but pretends to have a “conversation.” Can you do a roast of Ro? Be vulgar.
English
0
0
0
207
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
Welcome, sorry to point out a key mistake on your first post ever. You said incorrectly “… delivering promises to the American people,” but you meant “… delivering promises to Israeli people, donors and rigging the stock market to favor friends and families with well-timed ‘Truths’.”
English
0
0
4
155
Susie Wiles
Susie Wiles@SusieWiles47·
I’m joining X to share occasional updates about the work we do at the White House. We are relentlessly focusing on advancing President Trump’s agenda and delivering on promises to the American people. I welcome different viewpoints. Follow along for insights and information.
English
11.6K
10.6K
106K
10.1M
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@zerohedge In other words, IC is pushing the President, as they always do, to continue the war by building a narrative around him. What could go wrong?
English
0
0
4
319
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
"Intelligence agencies are studying how Iran would respond if Trump were to declare a unilateral victory. The goal is to understand the implications of Trump pulling back from a conflict that some worry could contribute to deep Republican losses at the midterm elections" - RTRS
English
93
47
509
109.1K
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
After the Maduro raid, @realDonaldTrump got carried away believing his own half-truth “I stopped 8 wars,” leading him to think he’s the one to permanently solve long-lasting world problems. That was the biggest banger for us. This turned the @WhiteHouse into a revolving door for every foreign lobbyist, as @mtgreenee said. - Not following through on many domestic policies, - Letting insurance premiums hike more than 3x without solutions in sight, - Failed tariffs rollout (remember the tariffs to replace income taxes talking point?) and no tariff refund checks, - Stalled deportations, - Epstein scandal / failure to convert Epstein List into Epstein Indictment, - People in orbit getting rich off “Truths” while voters suffer deeply, - Unable to tame inflation, - Nonexistent legislative agenda, - Failed transparency promises (Charlie Kirk, JFK, Aliens, Drones, Butler, and so on). Those are some that have deeply divided the right so far. But I would still vote for him over murderous Kamala followers, and that’s our weakness—being left to pick the lesser of two evils, but evil nonetheless.
English
0
0
1
34
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
If you voted for Trump in the 2024 election, overall how would you rate his current term, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest:
English
261
118
264
81.4K
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
30 seconds before market open, Trump says "Iran has just informed us that they are in a "State of Collapse." They want us to "Open the Hormuz Strait" as soon as possible."
zerohedge tweet media
English
388
390
3.4K
292.2K
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@XFreeze You may want to add the potential murder of Suchir Balaji, who was 4 years employee of Open AI, to your list? Did anyone think his interview with Tucker Carlson went well for him on this topic?
English
15
55
811
38.3K
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Scam Altman has a incredible track record for being a con artist I don't think anyone has a "former ally turned enemy" list this big with directly with people he worked with A massive new 18-month investigation dropped, revealing the full list of people who worked directly with Sam Altman and now openly say they don’t trust him - they call him a liar, manipulator, scam artist, and worse These are his co-founders, board members, top executives, and biggest partners. Not random haters: • Elon Musk (OpenAI co-founder) ➝ Betrayed the original nonprofit, open & safe AI mission and turned it into a closed profit machine What he says: Calls him "Scam Altman" and “Sam Altman lies as easily as he breathes” • Ilya Sutskever (OpenAI co-founder & former Chief Scientist) Why: Discovered Sam repeatedly lied about safety protocols and bypassed board oversight. What he says/did: Compiled 70+ pages of memos, Slack messages, and evidence proving Sam’s lies → helped fire him. Said he didn’t think “Sam is the guy who should have his finger on the button for AGI” • Dario Amodei (former OpenAI President, now Anthropic CEO) Why: Left because of Sam’s leadership and broken safety promises What he says: “The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself.” Called the company under Sam "mendacious” (full of lies) and compared it to Big Tobacco knowingly selling something dangerous. Accused him of a clear “pattern of behavior” • Helen Toner (former OpenAI Board Member) Why: Sam made it impossible for the board to do its job through constant deception What she says: He was “outright lying to the board” and created a “toxic atmosphere” of psychological pressure • Tasha McCauley (former OpenAI Board Member) Why: Complete loss of trust after years of the same behavior What she says: Senior leaders reported Sam cultivated a “toxic culture of lying” • Jan Leike (former Superalignment co-lead) Why: Sam deprioritized real safety work for shiny products What he says: Resigned publicly saying he “lost confidence” in OpenAI leadership and that the company was “losing its way” on alignment • Mira Murati (former CTO - one of Sam’s closest longtime collaborators) Why: Lost all confidence in his leadership as they approached AGI What she says: Told insiders “I don’t feel comfortable about Sam leading us to AGI” and said his playbook is to say whatever he needs to get what he wants, and if that fails, destroy your credibility • Microsoft executives (including major tensions with CEO Satya Nadella) Why: Felt constantly misled on deals and partnerships What they say: A senior exec warned he could be remembered as a “Bernie Madoff or Sam Bankman-Fried-level scammer” • Paul Graham (Y Combinator co-founder - Sam was YC President) Why: Long pattern of deception during his time running YC What he says: Privately told YC colleagues, “Sam had been lying to us all the time" • Loopt board & early employees (Sam’s first startup) Why: History of chaotic and deceptive behavior What they did: Employees went to the board twice trying to get him fired over lack of honesty and shady behavior These are his co-founders, board members, closest executives, and major partners who actually worked with him all say the exact same things - chronic lying, manipulation, broken trust, toxic culture, scam & deception
X Freeze tweet media
English
852
1.9K
7.2K
21.9M
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸
Inverse Liberal 🇺🇸@InverseLiberal·
@chamath This kind of forms makes it easy for CA to force people out of their homes so they community “developers” can easily buy for cheap and also more “affordable” housing projects - without having to use eminent domain.
English
0
0
0
2.5K
Chamath Palihapitiya
As you go to work today and settle into the week, please study the form below. You will soon need to fill this out EVERY year and tell the government what you own and then allow them to tell you how much its worth. That is the framework that is enabled by the Trojan Horse "Billionaire Tax" that is trying to get passed. Give them credit: they cleverly use Billionaires as the hook, but build in the language and the framework that will allow the Legislature to simply extend the tax to everyone and make it yearly. And this is where the form below comes in... In this case, ask yourself, will it be you or the Billionaires that will be able to fill this out properly and avoid penalties. As much as Billionaires can be pushed to do more for society, we all know that they have the infrastructure to manage these kinds of disclosures...middle class Californians do not and they will be the ones that get penalized in the end.
Chamath Palihapitiya tweet media
English
1.2K
3.9K
12.6K
2.5M