🛸
5.2K posts




















"Out of all the human beings wey dey the world, the person wey devil dey jealous pass na artist... dem collect im work." - OdumoduBlvck









I’m not going to tell you what to believe for @union_build mainnet but I know people are currently using the 4% allocations to spread negativity. Personally, I have a different opinion. Allocations do not matter, what matters is execution and how the team chooses to launch the $U token Let me give you a simple example and later I’ll do a more comprehensive analysis of launch possibilities. VALUATION This is always the most important aspect of launch and everyone conveniently tries to avoid it so they can spread disinformation for their own selfish reasons. > Scenario 1: $U launches at $1B FDV That’s $0.1 per U token MarketCap at TGE = $0.1 x 1.919B tokens = $191 million The 4% given to community at this valuation is $40 million > Execution: I have always been of the opinion that less than 100k testers were human of which those from level 6 to level 10 were less than 40k so I’ll use that for this rough calculation. If all 40,000 testers were given an equal share of the allocation (No XP used for distribution) Each tester, will go home with $1000 > Now, begin to add criteria for eligibility and multipliers like XP, level, TSC, NFTs and community contribution Some testers will walk away with mid 4 figures, others with 3 figs. > similarly, Yappers around the top 100 will all get 5-4 figs, and others a significant 3 figs I’ll draw up a more comprehensive breakdown of Union launch scenario from a bearish launch to extremely bullish I don’t see any point in crying now, when the deed is done. Stop letting big accounts think for you zkgm



