Darrel Barnett

5.2K posts

Darrel Barnett banner
Darrel Barnett

Darrel Barnett

@IonicFuser

A real twitter user. Definitely not a bot. If I seem angry, it's because of Labour, Tories, and Reform.

Bristol Katılım Ekim 2014
340 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
vibetechnologist
vibetechnologist@vibeteknologist·
@IonicFuser @K_Niemietz Incredible self awareness there big boss. All the best and can’t wait for you to get the government you want. Let’s see how it goes
English
1
0
0
8
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@vibeteknologist @K_Niemietz Looks like i touched a nerve. Maybe you'll finally leave me alone. If you want to debate, contact No Justice Mtg. I'm sure she won't make you look like a complete tool to the system.
English
0
0
0
6
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@MCFvalidator @K_Niemietz Not when the country doesn't give a fuck about their citizens in poverty and just let them die. They don't count them, why should we?
English
0
0
0
19
MCF
MCF@MCFvalidator·
@IonicFuser @K_Niemietz This doesn’t measure wealth. Most people in India or China are poor, there are just a lot of them. GDP per capita is what you should be looking at for wealth. The UK is #30
English
1
0
0
30
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@vibeteknologist @K_Niemietz Its not an ad hom, because im not using it as an answer to your question numb nuts. Its called an insult. Which is not an ad hominem. You messaged me 5 times before I responded, I think you need to touch grass pal. (And get hair plugs)
English
1
0
0
16
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@vibeteknologist @K_Niemietz The gloablist elite capitalist system works as intended. They've brainwashed you into praying to the stock market and see numbers go up when in reality, more people are suffering day by day. The Greens will change that system to work for the many, not the few.
English
1
0
0
20
vibetechnologist
vibetechnologist@vibeteknologist·
@IonicFuser @K_Niemietz Well, funny you should use that expression when you seem to have the numeracy of a Labrador mate. Maybe stop being angry and focus on getting smarter!
English
1
0
0
24
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@HyboreanCat @llwtydeer We won't need to pay as much in benefits if those already in work no longer need to be funded. Supermarkets should have the responsibility to pay their staff a living wage. So actually, tax go up mate.
English
1
0
0
6
Punished Hyperborean Catboy
@IonicFuser @llwtydeer Oh I see. So in the even that everyone's wages are increased in order to meet Green's ratio, the supermarket just goes bust and everyone loses out The alternative being that the higher paid staff are paid less, resulting in a lower tax take and less money in people's pockets
English
1
0
1
7
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@K_Niemietz @vibeteknologist No i mean this man suffers from Trichotillomania looking at his balding scalp. Hes obsessed. Won't stop messaging me whilst I am busy at work.
English
1
0
0
24
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@DeborahMeaden There campaign adverse are literally calling for hope not hate. You must have missed that one. Continue to bat for a fascist party that protects your business interests however despite them backing genocides.
English
0
0
0
19
Charles Orton-Jones
Charles Orton-Jones@CharlesOJ·
@IonicFuser Both wealth and income are important for loan rates (amongst other things). Either way, the chart you posted shows GDP. Not wealth, as you thought it did. So wrong chart. Delete.
English
1
0
1
24
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@HyboreanCat @llwtydeer Prices are set by retail category managers, pricing analysts and buying teams which are influenced by stakeholders. So as much as you'd love to here me say price goes up, it isn't as simple as that. We can also put rules and regulations to control food prices and other essentials
English
1
0
0
11
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@HyboreanCat @llwtydeer My answer was clear. CEO's need a paycut not nurses/doctors/teachers/care workers etc. Lowering their wage and raising the lowest wage to match the 10:1 ratio isn't difficult for the majority of the staff at any business, especially supermarkets. Maybe the staff should have a say
English
1
0
0
21
Hector Drummond
Hector Drummond@hector_drummond·
1) That still doesn't make it necessary. Do you even understand what "necessary" means? Maybe go look it up. 2) Even in those situations where your GDP is increased by infrastructure spending, whether increasing the debt was a good idea depends on how much you increased the debt relative to how much your GDP increased. A large increase in GDP relative to a small increase in debt is fine. The opposite is not. You don't want your repayments being more than the increase in GDP, for example. And we got the opposite. 3) Not much of the spending in recent decades has been on infrastructure. In fact, some of our financial problems comes from the fact that we have to spend so much money on servicing the existing debt. Just the interest alone is a killer. 4) The Green spending splurge will mostly not be on infrastructure. 5) Your framing is dishonest. Greens want to increase ideological spending, but then pretend it's just about infrastructure spending when challenged by someone who doesn't share their ideology. 6) You're sidetracking. The fact remains that we are massively in debt, and are not rich.
English
1
1
0
104
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@CharlesOJ Right, and what allows you to pay back debts quicker making you a more reliable and viable country to loan to at lower rates?
English
2
0
1
106
Charles Orton-Jones
Charles Orton-Jones@CharlesOJ·
@IonicFuser This is a chart of GDP. Not wealth. One is a flow (annual increase in value created) the other is a stock (total wealth) So wrong chart.
English
1
0
1
172
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@hector_drummond @aswren Except if the debt was used for infrastructure that increases our GDP, we can pay it off quicker than we could before. See how that works? Debt is necessary.
English
1
0
0
22
Hector Drummond
Hector Drummond@hector_drummond·
If a country can't pay its debt back it goes bankrupt regardless of what it is for. Government debt is neither inevitable or necessary. Some amount is manageable, though. But when it's almost 100% of GDP you're in big trouble, and need to get it down. Pretending you're rich and should increase your debt is mad. God help us if you lot ever get into power.
English
1
0
0
15
Darrel Barnett
Darrel Barnett@IonicFuser·
@hector_drummond @aswren Every Nation has debt, but it depends what the debt is for. Maybe look into that. A country's budget is not the same as a household. Debt is inevitable and necessary for a functioning economy dummy.
English
1
0
0
14
Hector Drummond
Hector Drummond@hector_drummond·
@IonicFuser @aswren That page doesn't take into account debt. You can have a massive business with a huge turnover, but if you have a huge debt and have run big losses every year for decades you're not rich.
English
1
0
0
22