John Junginger

2.2K posts

John Junginger

John Junginger

@Iowa_Eavesdrop

Retired Academic and VHA Clinical Psychologist. Catholic Altar Boy during the Latin Era, which my friends claim explains a great deal.

The Heartland Katılım Mart 2024
95 Takip Edilen96 Takipçiler
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@SassebNana @TrumpWarRoom No evidence for that libelous claim. GROK: **No, there is no credible, substantiated evidence in the Epstein files (or anywhere public) that President Trump raped children.** Me: Get a lawyer.
English
0
0
0
17
Trump War Room
Trump War Room@TrumpWarRoom·
President Trump to the kids at the 2026 White House Easter Egg Roll: "I could sign autographs for you guys, and then tonight, you could sell them for $25,000 on eBay." 🤣
English
37
107
592
30.5K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@JUConnor25 @TrumpWarRoom Did you see the SOTU address, Chachi? No meandering, no fumbles, no confusion, no frozen pauses--every topic or point was perfectly delivered. You might consider avoiding mental health areas you know nothing about.
English
0
0
0
7
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@TrumpWarRoom Heh! That just might be true, mostly bcs his signature is so distinctive.
English
0
0
0
199
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
I dunno that it quite fits the constitutional definition of "treason," but that's hardly anything to brag about. What a disgusting thing to be known for: "Adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort: This involves intent to betray the U.S. by providing material help to a foreign enemy (a nation or group in open hostilities with the U.S.). Mere sympathy, speech, or actions that indirectly harm the U.S. do not qualify without both adherence (intent) and actual aid."
English
0
0
0
8
Senator Jeff Merkley
Senator Jeff Merkley@SenJeffMerkley·
President Trump's profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran's civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law. To our military leaders, remember this: You are legally required to refuse orders to commit war crimes.
English
3.3K
1.4K
4K
116.4K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@ajpl_energy @WhiteHouse Well, that's one very odd way of looking at it. The rest of us simply would prefer not being annihilated by an Iranian nuclear missile.
English
0
0
2
60
Isaac I aspire
Isaac I aspire@ajpl_energy·
@WhiteHouse This should not have happened if US does not wage a war on Iran. A totally clueless president who has no strategy and risk Americans lives for his own glory and benefits. About time this clown send his children to the battle field.
English
35
0
12
6K
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
🚨“WE GOT HIM! My fellow Americans, over the past several hours, the United States Military pulled off one of the most daring Search and Rescue Operations in U.S. History, for one of our incredible Crew Office Members, who also happens to be a highly respected Colonel, and who I am thrilled to let you know is SAFE and SOUND!” - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
The White House tweet media
English
11.6K
43.5K
233K
13M
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
Sheez, you're a downer. While the rest of us celebrate, consider looking into your salacious claims about the President. You're dutifully parroting the talking points of the nitwit "influencers", but practically all of that nonsense has been completely discredited. ...and how is it that the President is "all over the Epstein files"? The explanation isn't nearly as incriminating as you're implying.
English
0
0
2
36
Eric Jay
Eric Jay@EricinAmericaX·
Are you seriously turning this into a political stunt? Trump is that f-cking desperate huh? Captain "Bone Spurs" has never cared about our troops. "Sadly, there will likely be more before it ends. That’s the way it is. Likely be more.” This was Trump's response to service members being killed in action as a consequence of his war of CHOICE. And as the death toll rises, there are big indications that Trump plans to put boots on the ground as he sends more troops to the region and as he demands more funding. What's SAD is that Trump's groveling supporters will continue to implicitly defend him and his needless foreign war. But Trump does not care about the cost, casualties and repercussions of this war outside of how it impacts HIS ratings and unpopularity. Trump has no sympathy for our troops and their families. He's even insulted our fallen soldiers on multiple occasions. HIS POLICIES HAVE MADE LIFE MORE CHALLENGING FOR VETERANS AT HOME: Let's start with the Trump administration deporting veterans and the massive VA workforce reductions, funding gaps, and operational disruptions that have led to things like cancelled contracts, program slowdowns and delayed delivery of care/claims. Trump and house Republicans also backed a CR that zeroed out funding for the Toxic Exposure Fund (TEF), which covers healthcare costs for troops exposed to toxic substances like burn pits. The VA was one of many agencies hit hard by Trump's layoffs. Employees received this cruel notice: "You have not demonstrated that your further employment at the Agency would be in the public interest." Thousands of veterans/VA staff members lost their jobs. VA layoffs included nurses, doctors, mental health professionals and claims processors; meaning longer wait times for Veterans, significantly reduced outreach, processing backlogs, less access to benefits, and even interruptions in medical screenings. These cuts also put veterans' medical care at risk by interrupting life saving cancer trials; by limiting their access to care, and by ending treatment oversight. Cuts/hiring freezes have also disrupted mental health services for veterans; including lay offs of Crisis Line staff who offer suicide‑prevention resources to them. Trump has also canceled contracts supporting homeless veterans. He ended the mortgage assistance program that helped save tens of thousands of their homes. Then there's his "warrior dividend" check in the amount of $1776. Another obvious publicity gimmick. These funds came from an already‑approved housing allowance supplement for veterans. The money was just redirected and rebranded for political purposes. TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY DISRESPECTED OUR VETERANS: He referred to veterans killed in action as "suckers" and "losers" and refused to visit a cemetery where American soldiers are buried because it was "filled with losers." He insulted POWs and John Mccain when he said, "I prefer people who weren't captured." He downplayed traumatic brain injuries that dozens of military personnel suffered from in Iraq as a result of his provocations in the Middle East. He minimized the significance of the Medal of Honor. He's repeatedly insulted our distinguished military leaders. Trump's "Department of War" fired high ranking, black and female military officials with illustrious careers, only to replace them with far less qualified (white) loyalists. So much for "merit." His behavior at the Arlington National cemetery during his election campaign was extremely disrespectful. Trump was so desperate for a photo op that him and his staff violated long standing rules meant to honor and respect fallen soldiers and their families. They even got into a physical altercation with cemetery staff, and all for the sake of politicizing a national shrine. Trump doesn't care about veterans. He cares about demonstrating his strength through his unbridled use of themilitary. He cares far more about his ratings than the lives of our soldiers.
English
349
7
77
17.1K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
You do recognize that Israel will not be the only country targeted for nuclear annihilation by Iran, right? And..., although any losses suffered by Israel and the US in this war are a legitimate concern, your gloating list actually shows that there have been remarkably few. You might consider staying on the sidelines and keeping it to yourself that you're rooting for the wrong side.
English
0
0
0
71
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
BREAKING: BAD FRIDAY: - US F-15 shot down. - An A-10 Warthog, has crashed in the Persian Gulf - Two US rescue helicopters involved in F-15 search and rescue efforts were struck by Iranian fire. Get us the heck out of the Middle East NOW!
English
457
1.6K
4.8K
104.2K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@martinez_j7902 @krassenstein Did you watch the SOTU address? No hint of dementia there. You might be more careful about expressing opinions about topics you know nothing about.
English
0
0
1
18
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
Just curious Maga, do you think that the statement above is any worse than the statement below? If so, explain why.
Brian Krassenstein tweet media
English
52
15
127
19.9K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@krassenstein One may express concern about Trump's health or his golf game, but not both. And.., claiming he's "nowhere to be found" simply bcs he's not appearing regularly on MSNow is just dumb. (Kinda' looks like the daily memo got jumbled, doesn't it?)
English
0
0
2
71
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
GROK: **No, there is no credible, substantiated evidence in the Epstein files (or anywhere public) that President Trump raped children.** Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) did make statements in early February 2026 (e.g., a Feb. 3 press conference and subsequent House Judiciary Committee exchanges) claiming the released Epstein-related files contain "**highly disturbing allegations**" that Donald Trump raped children and threatened to kill children. He noted that Trump’s name appears thousands of times in the documents released to date (only about half of the total files). Lieu was criticizing the DOJ/AG Pam Bondi over transparency and using it to push for more investigation or a special counsel. However: - Lieu was explicitly referring to **unverified allegations** in the files, **not** proven facts, video evidence, or anything he personally “has” as smoking-gun proof. Fact-checks (Snopes, Lead Stories, Yahoo/Lead Stories) confirmed this distinction and debunked viral exaggerations claiming Lieu said the files “show” Trump raping children on tape or that he viewed unreleased video. - The specific claims trace back to old, uncorroborated FBI tips and witness statements, including: - A 1990s limo driver (named in some reports as a source named Ferree) who claimed he overheard Trump on a phone call with someone he called “Jeffrey” referencing “abusing some girl,” and later said a young girl told him she was raped by Trump and Epstein at a hotel. This was an unclassified FBI intake document—raw, unverified tips, not investigated to the level of charges. - References to “Jane Doe 4” (a woman alleging abuse as a minor in the mid-1980s involving Epstein and, per her account, Trump). Epstein’s estate reportedly settled a related civil claim (per accountant Richard Kahn’s deposition testimony), but settlements do not admit guilt, and Trump was not publicly named or charged in that matter. FBI interviewed her multiple times around 2019; memos were later released but remain uncorroborated by other evidence or prosecution. These are the kinds of raw tips, hearsay, and civil allegations that surface in large document dumps like the Epstein files (flight logs, depositions, FBI memos from the Giuffre-Maxwell case and related probes). None have resulted in charges against Trump, let alone convictions. Trump has long denied any sexual misconduct tied to Epstein, banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after an alleged incident involving a minor, and cooperated with investigators in the past. Attorney General Pam Bondi and others in the DOJ have stated there is no evidence Trump committed a crime in these files. Brian Allen’s (@allenanalysis) posts in late February/early March 2026 amplified Lieu’s comments into a “Major Bombshell,” framing them as a congressman revealing that the files prove Trump “raped minors” and that this explains sealed documents or other events. That’s a rhetorical escalation—the files contain **allegations**, not established evidence. Bottom line: Allegations exist in the files (as Lieu noted), but they are unproven, uncorroborated, and decades old. No court, grand jury, or credible investigation has validated them as fact. If new, verified evidence ever emerges, it would be major news—but as of now, none has. This appears to be partisan amplification of existing raw claims rather than a new “bombshell” revelation of guilt.,
English
0
0
0
36
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
🚨 MAJOR BOMBSHELL: Ted Lieu says the full, unreleased Epstein files show Donald Trump R*PING children. That’s what’s being hidden. That’s why the files stay sealed. That’s why there are no arrests. Release everything. Let the truth come out. Or RESIGN!
English
11.2K
44.6K
188.5K
7.9M
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
MAJOR BOMBSHELL redux: You "likers" are being taken for chumps. Think for yourself and ponder for a moment how this could possibly be true. Several people, including some in the Biden administration, have had access to all of the Epstein documents and no one has even hinted at such a thing. Of course, that's assuming you haters are genuinely interested in the truth.
English
0
0
0
9
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@JoJoFromJerz Didn't realize military strategy was one of your expertise. ...and here I thought "influencer" was just a deceptive term for a divisive agitator.
English
1
0
1
85
Jo
Jo@JoJoFromJerz·
“A former Fox News weekend host just fired a four-star general with combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, replaced him with his own former assistant, and did it during a live war in which the next decision could put American soldiers on Iranian soil for the first time in history. No hearing was held. No misconduct cited. The Army woke up on April 3 with a new chief it did not choose, in a war it did not start, preparing for a phase the previous chief apparently could not be trusted to execute.”
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86

JUST IN: You do not fire your Army Chief of Staff in the middle of a war for no reason. You fire him because of what comes next. Pete Hegseth called General Randy George on April 2 and told him to retire immediately. The Pentagon confirmed it within hours. No reason was given. Not publicly. Not privately. A senior Army official told Fox News that Hegseth offered George nothing: no misconduct, no operational failure, no policy disagreement on the record. Just a phone call and a career ending in the middle of the most significant American combat operation in two decades. George is the 24th general or admiral Hegseth has removed. But he is not the 24th. He is the one that matters. The Army Chief of Staff. The man whose signature sits between a president’s intent and the order that sends soldiers across a beach or into a tunnel complex. The 82nd Airborne is deploying right now. Marines from the 31st MEU are staged on the USS Tripoli. JSOC operators are at forward bases in Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Kharg Island, 90 percent of Iranian oil exports, sits 16 kilometres off a coast that someone will have to decide whether to approach. And the four-star general whose job it was to advise whether that approach should happen was removed 48 hours after Trump told the nation the war would continue for two to three more weeks. The replacement is Vice Chief General Christopher LaNeve. He was Hegseth’s senior military aide before this appointment. The man who carried the Secretary’s briefcase now commands the Army the Secretary is reshaping. The chain of command did not break. It shortened. The distance between a television studio and a combat order just collapsed to zero intermediaries who were not personally selected by the man giving the order. No reason was given. That is the tell. When someone is removed without explanation during a crisis, the explanation is the crisis itself. George either objected to something or was about to. The ground option. The power plant strikes. The Kharg raid. The escalation that turned a highway bridge in Karaj into rubble on the same day he was told to leave. Something in the next two weeks requires a chief who will not push back, and the Pentagon solved that problem by installing one trained as Hegseth’s aide. A former Fox News weekend host just fired a four-star general with combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, replaced him with his own former assistant, and did it during a live war in which the next decision could put American soldiers on Iranian soil for the first time in history. No hearing was held. No misconduct cited. The Army woke up on April 3 with a new chief it did not choose, in a war it did not start, preparing for a phase the previous chief apparently could not be trusted to execute. The question is not why George was fired. Every general in the building knows why. The question is what order is coming in the next fourteen days that required removing the one man in the chain of command who might have said no. The war has no perimeter. The chain of command has no objectors. And the next phase has no one left to stop it. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

English
130
800
2.2K
89K
Emre Yurttas
Emre Yurttas@emrey35·
@JoJoFromJerz Yep I here a lot more boos than cheers for sure and couldn't happen to a more deserving person!
English
7
4
102
1K
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@JoJoFromJerz Characterizing the booing as "glorious" seems a bit misleading when the cheers were at least as audible to my ears. Again, folks, if you don't investigate the claims of so-called influencers yourself, you're allowing them to play you for chumps.
English
0
0
8
152
John Junginger
John Junginger@Iowa_Eavesdrop·
@realTonyVentura @jason_meister No evidence for that claim. Don't take my word for it--do your GD homework! Wishing something were true won't make it so, no matter how many times you repeat it.
English
0
0
2
82
Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸
Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸@jason_meister·
Imagine throwing a “No Kings” protest after your party refused to hold a primary, coronated Kamala without a single vote, sued to keep RFK Jr. off the ballot, and attempted to remove Trump from state ballots only after your illegal lawfare scheme failed. If there was a modern day monarchy in America there would only be one party you could point to. The Democrats.
English
1.1K
8.6K
35.2K
616.4K