IronSkeptic

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Also in another thread someone is trying to defend out of India lmao

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Yeah nah, out-of-India is retarded lol. Indo-Aryan is used since technically only Andronovo and their offshoots used Aryan as their ethnonym, and saying just Indic (which I've also seen used) might've pissed off other South Asians idk

learning today that there’s a significant cohort of Indians who believe they’re just white people who tan easily and that sunscreen will help them not be brown anymore

@bagri_sang48554 @Toxoplasma58622 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Out of India for the Yamnaya is bunk from modern genetic evidence

@Toxoplasma58622 @IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism No rakhigarhi dna shows similarity to ancestral turkmen people sk there are chance of out of India theory

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Except for the Sino and Iranic groups. Is this a correct assumption?

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Indic is a much better term imo. I also did a double take on the “race chart” previously posted and I don’t know a ton about all the Indian racial groups but it appears to me like it’s listing out competent groups. Like if I where to say the European races where IE, WHG, and AF

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism I mistook it for an out of India claim for the Yamanaya, that makes more sense the way you’ve explained it and I double checked and that wording is consistent with other literature. But it is strange to use it that way to me.

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism To me that's a valid take, you just gotta be aware you will see it used interchangeably or specifically for the cultures produced by the Aryan invasion/migration, as their language family is still called Indo-Aryan.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism My assumption is the Indo-Ayrans are the ones pre-Dravidian mixing. Similar to how modern Europeans aren’t now considered Bellbreaker even though they have large admixture.

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Andronovo culture were Indo-Iranian speakers for reference.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Are Indo-Aryans in this schema mixed in with the native dravidians at this point?

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Yeah Bell Beakers are an offshoot of Corded Ware who descend from PIE speakers that mixed with farmers, it can get confusing keeping track so I get the misconception. For Indo-Aryans the line of descent is from Corded Ware -> Sintashta -> Andronovo -> Indo Aryans.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism Usually when splitting up on the European end of the migrations they are referred to as bell breaker or other names rather than Indo-European. And with the claim of the original post I assumed the original naming schema for the primary group.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism I do believe that the issue here is semantic because generally PIE is referring to the language group. And Ayrans, Indo-ayrans, Yamnaya, Indo-European. Are used interchangeably for the original group that spoke PIE. I’ve not seen people draw distinctions between the four terms.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism The Indo-Aryans or the Yamnaya peoples are the orginator group for the PIE language family and come from Ukraine. Not sure what your point is of the Indo Aryan languages being spoken in India given they weren’t until that group came in.

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Almost like that's exactly what I just fucking said 😂 genuine IQlet

@zinta_dev @exxcllnt @Slatzism The same logic implies humans don’t originate in Africa because Africans have genetic material not found in any other human group and rather seems to be from an intermixing with another hominid species.

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism What an idiot. By the same logic every single human came from Africa.

@exxcllnt @Slatzism They originate from the great steppes near the caucuses and Ukraine not northern India

@IronSkeptic @Slatzism what

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism PIE(proto-indo-European) is the originating language of all latter derived groups and also comes from the steppes not India

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Indo-Aryan is a branch of Indo-European (by way of Indo-Iranian). Yes, Indo-European originated in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, and Indo-Iranian in Central Asia, but proto Indo Aryan was spoken in the subcontinent by people with a modern North Indian profile.

@sumguy265 @exxcllnt @Slatzism If they are from India Dravidian admixture should exist in Aryan genetic strains in Europe and Iran which there isn’t .

@IronSkeptic @exxcllnt @Slatzism Proto Indo-Aryan language already had a Dravidian substrate. It's as Indian as Hellenic is Greek.

@exxcllnt @Slatzism >indic races >indo-aryan They came from Ukraine/Caucuses and Indians are only like 10% admixture from them

@Slatzism there are many races in India some of them have light skin you should know this by now, you call yourself a racist yet so uneducated?

When I was in college I was kicked out of TPUSA for being a "fascist" because I viewed Teddy Roosevelt as the ideal. I knew countless kids that got kicked out across the country for questioning black crime rates, for saying it's not just "the culture", for being anti-immigration, and for being anti-israel. Charlie only heel turned on those things within maybe a year or so before his death. The way lib and especially non-White America posthumously speak of him should be a reminder to literally every conservative, that when they kill you, they will remake you into a Nazi no matter how moderate you were.

We should wear these to festivals and events the same way the Japanese wear their kimonos