TheSilencedCookieCabalLeader

Welp, I have to rebuild my old account with this one because I lost my last account. I was @TheCookieCabal for anyone that cares but it looks like I won't be getting that account back.

@LeviAuroraOG @Howlingmutant0 @usswahoo @ShadowofEzra Incredible levels of pretzel brain taking place in your head. It's a whole ass factory up there.

@Howlingmutant0 @usswahoo @ShadowofEzra Why not? Doesn't matter. Goal would still be accomplished by the next puppet and the most "radical" and relevant right wing politician in a lot of young men's lifetime being killed sends a strong message.

Tucker Carlson hints that the first assassination attempt on President Trump was planned and covered up by Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu. Citing Joe Kent, Tucker says the investigation into that assassination attempt was immediately closed before any foreign involvement could be uncovered. Tucker also says “good guys” in the government are secretly fighting Israel but are overwhelmed by its influence and power.

Tucker and many others are seriously losing the plot. God damn.

@Astrophysicslad I think it doesn't spin so one side is always facing the sun. The dark side is cold because of it.

not that anybody asked, but despite being closest to the Sun, Mercury has ice. guess why?

Yosemite Valley is putting on a show right now. As warmer temperatures melt snowpack at higher elevations, waterfalls and creeks are rushing with water. Video by @YosemiteNPS

In space, water doesn’t behave the way you expect. In microgravity, there’s no gravity pulling it down—so surface tension takes over. Instead of dripping or flowing, water sticks together and clings to surfaces, even forming a floating layer around your hands. This is why astronauts can’t use normal sinks or showers. Water doesn’t fall away—it has to be carefully controlled and collected. This iconic experiment by Chris Hadfield shows just how strange everyday physics becomes in space. Credit: NASA / ESA

In 1984, astronaut Dale Gardner used a jetpack to fly completely untethered through space and catch a falling satellite by hand

Nice try, scientists, but the boys and I have already discussed this and it's not real!

There are honestly some decent and common questions about the Apollo program’s moon landings that I figured we should check out ourselves. Because there’s no denying things from the Apollo program look unusual and are quite literally foreign to us in all other contexts. Enjoy 10 months of research, work, dozens of animations, 9 hours of 6k dialogue that took up 3.1 terabytes of hard drive space and MOUNTAINS OF LOVE covering the most incredible journey in all of human history (so far), the Apollo Program. Send this to anyone who watched the Bart Siebrel video on @joerogan, and maybe @elonmusk, you should make Joe watch this so he has answers to his questions. 00:00:00 - INTRO 00:04:40 - APOLLO 17 LIFTOFF FOOTAGE 00:19:05 - WHY DON'T WE SEE STARS 00:25:40 - LUNAR SHADOWS 00:32:00 - CROSSHAIRS BEHIND OBJECTS 00:34:10 - WHY DID THE FLAG WAVE 00:38:00 - ASTRONAUTS ON WIRES 00:47:15 - FOOTPRINTS / PROP ROCKS 00:49:05 - MOON ROCK OR WOOD 00:51:35 - VAN ALLEN BELT RADIATION 01:12:55 - LOST APOLLO 11 TAPES 01:07:55 - DID NASA FAKE FOOTAGE 01:19:30 - LOST SATURN V PLANS 01:23:00 - THE LUNAR LANDER'S THIN SKIN 01:27:50 - LUNAR ROVER DUST 01:29:30 - OTHER PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE 01:37:20 - DID ANYONE ELSE TRACK THE MISSIONS 01:40:15 - THE SOVIETS' REACTION TO APOLLO 01:42:10 - ORBITAL MECHANICS OF APOLLO 01:51:15 - DELTA V OF APOLLO 02:04:30 - WHY HAVEN'T WE GONE BACK 02:14:30 - SUMMARY

@DrvingWhileJosh @JackTob88378875 @ManaByte Lmfao Absolutely comical. Did not miss a moment to prove the OPs point. Everything is a conspiracy. It's by far one of the funniest conspiracies ever invented by humans because of how utterly void of critical thought it requires to believe so many aspects of it.

I disagree. I started out to disprove the idiot flat earthers. There was no way anyone could seriously hold that theory and not be a crazy person. So I went to show how easy it is to show curvature…and couldn’t. Instead I was consistently disproving it. Then there was the space program. Started looking into all the evidence from decades of photos and videos, only to discover hundreds of discrepancies and some flat out fakes. Then that led into cosmology and the explanations given for how we don’t fly off the globe into space and how our air isn’t sucked into the vast vacuum surrounding us. That led to the origins of the modern heliocentric model and how you can’t get a dime as a scientist or researcher unless it confirms to that model. Then the conspiracy rabbit hole opened wide and here we are. So I am more than happy to debate opposing viewpoints, but the only answer when I present any is ‘you just don’t understand so and so’. Sadly I do which is why I bring them up. What has happened today is modern science has turned into a religion. You must believe in it and if you dare question its scriptures, then you are deemed a heretic and mentally deficient. It took me 4 months to let go of the indoctrination, so perhaps I need to employ more patience in the future. :)

There is a reason people do not debate Flat Earthers or Moon landing deniers. It is not because the evidence is weak. It is because the conversation is rigged from the start. You can bring measurements, physics, engineering, independent tracking, international verification, and experiments they can do in their own backyard, and none of it matters. The moment the facts show up, they shout fake, edited, CGI, conspiracy, or “that’s just your belief.” You cannot debate someone who treats every piece of evidence as invalid by default. You cannot debate someone who demands proof and then rejects the proof the second it appears. You cannot debate someone who thinks their personal disbelief outranks measurable reality. A debate requires both sides to accept evidence. Flat Earth and Moon landing denial collapse the moment evidence enters the room, so the only move left is to deny the room exists. That is why people do not debate them. Not because the globe is fragile, but because the argument they bring is. You cannot have a real discussion with someone who decided ahead of time that nothing you show them will ever count.

@SunsetBeachSurf @douplasss @gustav0cardenas Lmfao you blocked me after this idiotic message. Incredible stuff. Stay dumb I guess.

@SunsetBeachSurf @douplasss @gustav0cardenas You're talking to someone who has 15 yrs in the relevant fields. Believe me, you're assumptions are wrong. There have been radars produced that output so much power, they could track the moon from the surface of the Earth. Oh how little you know sweet summer child.

Algunos afirman que las imágenes de Apollo parecen falsas porque, si se acelera el video, los astronautas se mueven como en la Tierra. Sin embargo, el detalle clave está en el polvo lunar: cuando se levanta, cae en trayectorias parabólicas perfectas, sin dispersarse ni formar nubes que queden suspendidas. Eso solo es posible en un vacío (sin aire que frene las partículas) y con la baja gravedad de la Luna (~1/6 de la terrestre). En la Tierra, aunque aceleres o ralentices el video, el polvo se comportaría de forma muy diferente por la resistencia del aire. Este comportamiento del polvo es una de las pruebas más fuertes de que las grabaciones se hicieron realmente en la Luna.

AI gives the illiterate way too much confidence. Unless you keep your ego in check and build some parameters into the model(s) so they don'tjust agree with you, it’ll just act like a fawning dog, finding any way possible to back up your ramblings.

I don’t really understand the maths it takes to send humans behind the Moon and bring them back safely. And the more I sit with that, the more it genuinely messes with my head even tho my love for physics and my knowledge of physics is astounding to a point Somebody had to work out a path where the Moon’s gravity is pulling you in, the Earth is pulling you back, and you’re moving just fast enough and not slow enough not to get trapped by either. They had to figure out the exact angle to come back into Earth’s atmosphere too. Too steep, you burn up. Too shallow, you bounce off and drift into space. And they had to get all of that right at the same time, for real people sitting in a small metal capsule about 400k kilometres away from home. Nothing in that system is standing still. The Moon is moving. The Earth is moving. Even the Sun is pulling on everything. And still, some people looked at all of that motion, all of that chaos, and turned it into numbers you can follow. Go here. Adjust here. Come back here. And unlike nepa light, it infact works. There’s also that moment in the journey where the crew passes behind the Moon. No contact with Earth. No signal. Just silence, with a massive rock blocking everything they’ve ever known. The only reason they can stay calm in that moment is because someone, somewhere, did the maths and proved they’ll come out the other side. I don’t know what it feels like to trust something that much. To put your life in an equation when you’re that far away from everything. But I do know this for sure, whatever that level of thinking is, whatever it takes to reach it, it might be one of the most extraordinary things human beings have ever done...

Route of Nicole, the great white shark. She swam 11,100 km (6,897 miles) from Africa to Australia in just 99 days (December 11, 2003-February 28, 2004)

being a fish sucks because you have your usual gallery of underwater predators and then also you have to worry about a demon from another realm appearing to kill you too

One of the astronauts during the flyby behind the moon said that he was glad we couldn't see what they were seeing b/c humans aren't evolved enough for it. I have wondered if we are truly ready to know certain things that will upend major beliefs we hold. I'm not sure we are.

The @NASAArtemis crew captured this view of the Moon eclipsing the Sun yesterday. The three "stars" to the lower right of the Moon are actually planets. The middle one has a slightly red tint. That's Mars.

Gonna be honest, not caring about the current news has been the best decision of 2026 for me. Sure, I have opinions. Would that change anything? No. So, why waste time on worrying about it. I've been on social media far less because of it & I am way happier for it.

@douplasss @gustav0cardenas You fundamentally misunderstand how EM transmissions work. The Earth's atmosphere is one of only a few interferences, the transmission only needs to be powerful enough for the range. Cell signals deal with clutter, propagation effects, no line of sight, attenuation, noise, etc.

@gustav0cardenas How did they get live video back to earth from that far of a distance, yet cell service in many heavily populated parts of the USA still have dead zones. Please explain how that is possible

Unprecedented remnants from the Ice Age have been recovered from a water cave in Comal County. While snorkeling for fossils, University of Texas paleontologist John Moretti discovered fragments of a giant tortoise and an armadillo relative about the size of a lion, along with dozens of other fossils. These types of fossilized remains from about 100,000 years ago have never been found before in Central Texas. “There were fossils everywhere, just everywhere, in a way that I haven’t seen in any other cave,” said Moretti. “It was just bones all over the floor.” statesman.com/news/history/a…