Senior Nerdeloper (back again)

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Esta es la psicóloga Leiva, la que entregó a Angel a la madre a pesar de que el nene de 4 años suolicaba no ir con ella. Miserable.

60÷60=1 60÷15=4 60÷12=5 60÷10=6 60÷4=15 60÷3=20 60÷2=30 60÷1=60 60÷0.5=120 60÷0.01=6000 Do you see a pattern? The closer the divisor is to 0, the higher is the dividend. So, 0 is pretty small right? So, the result should be pretty by, right? Inifinitely small divisor would lead to infinitely big divudend. But....Lets's remind us what "a÷b" means. When we try to compute "12÷3", we are in fact solving □×3=12. We see 4×3=12, so, 12÷3=4. If we try to calculate "1÷0", we are in fact solving □×0=1. What can be put in the box? Well, nothing. Anything times 0 yield 0. So, it doesn't exist. And now, we can even tackle 0÷0. It would be solving □×0=0. What can be put in the box? Well, anything!Anything times 0 yield 0. So, anything fit. We say it's indetermined. (We expect one number and can put the whole number line in it!) It's why relying on gut/instinct/vibes can be perilous. But if you stick with the mathematical meaning, then all is fine. Also, when we had something approaching ∞, that was because it was a limit in disguise. That's a more advanced concept and irrelevant to the reason a÷0 is non existant when a≠0.

Un programador dependiente de la IA, no es programador.