Sorceryy 

1.2K posts

Sorceryy  banner
Sorceryy 

Sorceryy 

@ItsSorceryy

23, Memento mori.

Michigan, USA Katılım Haziran 2018
1.3K Takip Edilen68 Takipçiler
E.A.🤴🏾
E.A.🤴🏾@crashoutking1·
this angle is crazy. Hurley is a physcopath lmaooo
English
1K
7K
76.6K
17.9M
⚡️Garrett Ferguson⚡️
⚡️Garrett Ferguson⚡️@GarrettSprints·
I wonder what Calvin Johnson’s spider chart looks li- Holy mother of pearl
⚡️Garrett Ferguson⚡️ tweet media
English
49
129
7.6K
391.8K
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@Letters_ForAll @xwonde6 @espn @TheUFL Teams that gain more yards score more points. If you increase the scoring of a drive that stalls at the 40, the gap in scoring between higher and lower yardage teams will be smaller. I did not mean the gap would be gone, it’s a minor negative side effect.
English
0
0
0
13
ESPN
ESPN@espn·
60-YARD FIELD GOAL FOR 4 POINTS 🤯🔥 @TheUFL
English
136
271
2.8K
729.8K
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@dikalo111 @official_ST_ @john_maconi @espn @TheUFL I think a simple solution would be allowing to attempt a 60 yarder from anywhere within 60 yards, if you are down 4 and in the redzone on 4th you can lineup at the 43 and kick a 60. The rule may still reward mediocre offense too much but it would be worth a UFL trial for sure.
English
1
0
0
71
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@dikalo111 @official_ST_ @john_maconi @espn @TheUFL Will there never be a 4 pt game on the final drive? Why would the defense not take a penalty to guarantee a win? Why would the offense not take a penalty to give themselves a chance? Repeat. You can’t incentivize losing yards or penalize gaining yards or there will be issues.
Sargasmo@Sargasmica

@ItsSorceryy @34GreshamRd @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL Exactly. And then on 4th down, the defense intentionally gets an offsides penalty to out it in 3 point territory, so the offense intentionally gets a false start penalty to put it back to 4 points. And the 10 second runoff doesn't apply when the clock is already stopped.

English
1
0
0
81
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@34GreshamRd @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL The objective is not to score TDs, it’s to win the game. Usually scoring a TD is the #1 priority but not always. Late in the game the clock can take priority (kneeling, running more to kill time, passing more to save it). If a FG wins you the game that becomes the #1 priority.
English
0
0
0
19
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@dikalo111 @official_ST_ @john_maconi @espn @TheUFL As I stated here I am very open to changing any sports for the better, my issue is not with change but the rule itself. It breaks the forward progression incentive of football and adds a “4 pt line” that it can be beneficial to stay behind. It’s just half-baked.
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy

I’m usually a rare supporter of “radical” rule changes (pitch clock, dynamic kickoff, etc.) but this is just a bad rule. You shouldn’t get more points for gaining less yards, and it creates an incentive to lose yards in some situations. Try moving field pos. on a miss instead.

English
1
0
0
44
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@34GreshamRd @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL If it leads to winning it is good coaching, and vice versa. In the situation I stated considering it’s 3rd and 20 you have a better chance of winning if you lose 25 yards. We can find another way to reward great kicking that doesn’t flip the incentive to progress forwards.
Sargasmo@Sargasmica

@ItsSorceryy @34GreshamRd @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL Exactly. And then on 4th down, the defense intentionally gets an offsides penalty to out it in 3 point territory, so the offense intentionally gets a false start penalty to put it back to 4 points. And the 10 second runoff doesn't apply when the clock is already stopped.

English
1
0
1
37
Cadillac Bishop
Cadillac Bishop@34GreshamRd·
@ItsSorceryy @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL Most teams try to score TD not a FG. Plus a FG is not guaranteed. If you're playing for a FG in that situation you're probably a poorly coached team to begin with and deserve to lose
English
1
0
0
35
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@official_ST_ @john_maconi @espn @TheUFL It’s 3rd and goal at the 20 and we are down 4 with a minute left. I guess we run back 25 yards and go down to try to tie it. Also increases bad offenses scoring more than good offenses and closes the gap. Just a bad rule.
English
2
0
0
70
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@34GreshamRd @austin_2530 @espn @TheUFL It’s 3rd and goal at the 20 and we are down 4 with a minute left. I guess we run back 25 yards and go down to try to tie it. Also increases bad offenses scoring more than good offenses and closes the gap. Just a bad rule.
English
2
0
1
41
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@xwonde6 @espn @TheUFL It’s 3rd and goal at the 20 and we are down 4 with a minute left. I guess we run back 25 yards and go down to try to tie it. Also increases bad offenses scoring more than good offenses and closes the gap. Just a bad rule.
English
1
0
1
180
Nectarflow®
Nectarflow®@xwonde6·
@espn @TheUFL 60 yards for 4 points? NFL should copy this immediately and watch the league actually become watchable again. Tired of 3 boring points.
English
4
1
68
3.1K
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@swindeazy @ace_win @espn @TheUFL It’s 3rd and goal at the 20 and we are down 4 with a minute left. I guess we run back 25 yards and go down to try to tie it. Also increases bad offenses scoring more than good offenses and closes the gap. Just a bad rule.
English
0
0
1
12
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
I’m usually a rare supporter of “radical” rule changes (pitch clock, dynamic kickoff, etc.) but this is just a bad rule. You shouldn’t get more points for gaining less yards, and it creates an incentive to lose yards in some situations. Try moving field pos. on a miss instead.
ESPN@espn

60-YARD FIELD GOAL FOR 4 POINTS 🤯🔥 @TheUFL

English
0
0
0
67
Sorceryy  retweetledi
NEET CHUD
NEET CHUD@NeetChud888·
jobless chinese chuds will rule the world
English
34
659
7.8K
250.1K
Sorceryy 
Sorceryy @ItsSorceryy·
@dav64635 @P_Remarks You let propaganda completely cloud your worldview. What you are talking about is less than one in a million and the vast majority of Democrats don’t support it. Now what about the millions of Americans who will go hungry, lose healthcare, or those who will die for Israel?
Sorceryy  tweet media
English
0
0
27
450
DD
DD@dav64635·
@P_Remarks You also received: No more castrated kids.
English
11
0
2
2.4K