Ivan Zupic

12.6K posts

Ivan Zupic banner
Ivan Zupic

Ivan Zupic

@IvanZupic

Senior Lecturer in Entrepreneurship @ School of Creative Management, Goldsmiths, U. of London. Interests: text analysis, digital economy, bibliometrics, ...

London, England Katılım Kasım 2008
4.3K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Timothy Gowers @wtgowers
I've recently got in on the act of getting AI to solve open problems in mathematics. More precisely, I gave some questions asked by Melvyn Nathanson to ChatGPT 5.5 Pro, to which I have been given access, and it answered them. 🧵
English
73
367
1.9K
618K
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Tricia Dearborn
Tricia Dearborn@TriciaDearborn·
If you're thinking about using gen-AI to "write" books, this 🧵 is for you. I’m a highly experienced editor who’s been in the biz a long time. Recently I’ve had manuscripts come to me where the author has used gen-AI – not for writing, I’ve been assured, but for
English
111
485
2.6K
746.6K
EU Elitist
EU Elitist@6starwarsfilms·
@jinbahji77 Haven't seen it. Kenobi was the final chance I was willing to give them
English
12
0
24
2.2K
EU Elitist
EU Elitist@6starwarsfilms·
Disney's greatest modern achievement is making star wars fans like me completely apathetic I've read over 150 novels, played 20+ video games, thousands of comics, seen the movies probably 50 times each I dont know or care when the grogu movie comes out. I won't be watching it.
English
324
467
8.6K
404.4K
Ivan Zupic
Ivan Zupic@IvanZupic·
@Afinetheorem Never said it was easy, just that it makes sense for bigger players to rethink their dependency on US or Chinese tech. Agree there are co-dependencies often overlooked.
English
0
0
0
12
Kevin A. Bryan
Kevin A. Bryan@Afinetheorem·
@IvanZupic Literally none of the things currently being sold as "that you control" actually gets rid of all (or even most!) bottlenecks, so you don't in fact control anything.
English
1
0
2
319
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Tren Griffin
Tren Griffin@trengriffin·
Charlie Munger: "There are all kinds of wonderful new inventions that give you nothing as owners...All of the advantages from great improvements are going to flow through to the customers.”
Ronnie Chatterji@RonnieChatterji

Interesting study by @erikbryn and @avi_collis showing big consumer welfare gains from AI. Reminds us that large portion of the economic value of AI will not show up in traditional economic indicators. digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publication/wh…

English
2
11
65
14.8K
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Michael Pettis
Michael Pettis@michaelxpettis·
Tordior is right. In the 1980s, the US and Europe encouraged Japanese investment because they thought it would bring the "Japanese" management style that explained Japan's manufacturing success. But Japanese manufacturers ended up being no more successful than local ones once they were no longer protected by unlimited cheap financing, an undervalued currency, compliant labor unions, and government overspending on logistics and transportation infrastructure. In fact by the late 1990s, when because of terrible debt burdens Japanese producers could no longer count on the factors that were the real secret of their international competitiveness, reformers in Europe and the US were no longer demanding that their businesses become more "Japanese" in order to succeed. It was now Japanese reformers who insisted that their businesses become more "American". The point is that Chinese manufacturing is not more competitive than European manufacturing because of some special Chinese sauce that can be sprinkled abroad as easily as it is sprinkled at home. It is more competitive because it is based in an economy in which its competitiveness is driven by intervention in the country's external accounts. That is not to say that there aren't individual sectors in which Chinese manufacturers are genuinely more efficient that Europeans, but these sectors only emerged after many years of substantial protection and support from the Chinese government. The point is that if foreign manufacturers are aggressively outcompeting EU manufacturers because of substantial direct and indirect subsidies, the EU has three options. First, do nothing and see its share of global manufacturing wither. Second, match the subsidies and risk seeing the EU's debt burden rise as quickly as China's. Or three, intervene in the external account by enough to neutralize the effect of foreign ontervention. All of this would probably be more obvious if the EU's biggest economy, Germany, hadn't once enjoyed (and still enjoys to some extent) many of the very advantages that now threaten it. Manufacturers in extremely competitive, surplus economies think that because they are more competitive globally, they must also be more efficient. In fact, as Japan's example overwhelmingly illustrates, the direct and indirect subsidies that made their manufacturers so globally competitive also undermined their efficiency to such an extent that, once they were eliminated, many of them, unable to compete, quickly went bankrupt.
Sander Tordoir@SanderTordoir

There is too much free lunching in the European debate on Chinese FDI. Those who oppose tougher trade measures tend to underline the need for more Chinese investment, but that’s a cop-out. The EU wont get the investment without strategic tariffs.

English
49
247
1.1K
105.6K
John Attridge
John Attridge@John_Attridge·
@Liamjsm @trumpisacuck666 What do you mean you don't know that Phillip Seymour Hoffman played Lester Bangs in an aggressively mediocre music pic
English
4
1
57
3.3K
John Attridge
John Attridge@John_Attridge·
Film literacy among young people is at an all time low. My gen z students are shockingly unfamiliar with many key landmarks of modern cinema that were released in the 1990s
English
555
469
10.9K
3.1M
Ivan Zupic
Ivan Zupic@IvanZupic·
@TheStalwart The more I think about AI literacy, the more I come to the conclusion that it's just good ol' critical thinking.
English
0
0
0
84
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Daron Acemoglu
Daron Acemoglu@DAcemogluMIT·
Dear followers, please see this conversation with Jon Stewart and David Autor on AI, work, inequality and learning. I personally had a great time.
The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart@weeklyshowpod

When will the workforce begin to feel the full effects of AI? Jon welcomes MIT economists @davidautor and @DAcemogluMIT to discuss what the technology will do to work, learning, and our collective economic future. New pod out tomorrow! #theweeklyshow #jonstewart #politics

English
12
170
850
179K
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Prof Francois Balloux
Prof Francois Balloux@BallouxFrancois·
The 'self-domestication' of London foxes is a remarkable evolutionary feature. Though, it remains unclear to me to what extent this little dude, who lost his mum, might be wild, feral or tame. That said, while he's adorable and incredibly gentle, he stinks, and he can be incredibly annoying. There are likely good reasons why our ancestors domesticated cats and dogs, and not foxes ...
Prof Francois Balloux tweet mediaProf Francois Balloux tweet mediaProf Francois Balloux tweet mediaProf Francois Balloux tweet media
English
88
98
1.9K
129.1K
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
techbimbo
techbimbo@jameygannon·
”You're not gonna win, there's no fighting AI” Diplo's take on AI is spot on, and he's ahead of 99% of creatives, across all disciplines > it's inevitable, and you're dumb if you don't use it > it's a tool, just like many other things before it > taste and references matter A LOT amazing interview by @DanielSWall
English
302
250
3K
1.7M
Ivan Zupic retweetledi
Vlad Chituc
Vlad Chituc@VladChituc·
I’ve honestly found it crazy that, given the profit margins at journals, there isn’t standard house teams of statisticians, graphic designers, editors (in the magazine sense), people whose job it is to make sure all the code and results are reproducible, etc.
Brian D. Earp, Ph.D.@briandavidearp

New post 🚨 How commercial academic publishers can justify their own existence - by hiring human fact-checkers. briandavidearp.substack.com/p/how-commerci…

English
0
8
20
2.6K
Ivan Zupic
Ivan Zupic@IvanZupic·
@ryancbriggs My vision for peer review is peer reviewers getting two LLM reports alongside the paper so they needn't run their own.
English
0
0
1
387
Ryan Briggs
Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs·
I just reviewed a paper that should have been desk rejected (it happens) & I checked if openaireview running locally on my laptop via Claude Code using Gemma 4 could do a good enough job to desk reject it & it could. We can now screen papers with LLMs for the cost of electricity
English
21
6
134
54.5K
Gray Connolly
Gray Connolly@GrayConnolly·
Endless negotiation is an Iranian tactic for the Blob muppet class who think that 210 hours or 2100 hours will yield a different result... Iran has taken a fearful beating in the last month & yet still will not abandon its question for nukes - there is a lesson here for the wise
Aaron David Miller@aarondmiller2

If Administration believed after only 21 hours of negotiations, Iran would give up enrichment which is what Vance implied, they totally misread the moment and the Iranian dominated IRGC.

English
24
93
657
25.1K
Nicole Grajewski
Nicole Grajewski@NicoleGrajewski·
How is Robert Pape’s Claude doing today?
English
14
11
197
27.7K
Ivan Zupic
Ivan Zupic@IvanZupic·
@EmmaMAshford I will never cease to be amazed that seemingly reputable media publishes this kind of garbage.
English
0
0
8
823