John Nixon
233 posts
@JBN6972
AI & Blockchain Dev
Hey @Keir_Starmer, Soon we will just take over the country ourselves. Watch us organise in an untouchable way through services you cannot stop. Watch us fund our own missions to change this country with bitcoin. Watch us build a truly decentralised political party where policy is set and decided on by the people and voted on in real time. You're done.
We are working on a new kind of chat app. It's about secure conversations. No recording of contacts, messages don't say who they came from, messages delete after 6 hours, gotta know the users username. No idea if message received. No group chats. Optional vet key encryption of messages (costs 26B cycles per message). Simple & secure - almost like sending a message to the frontline. ClosedChat coming soon.
I don't believe caffeine will make the price of ICP go up substantially. To inference the models will costs USD, not cycles, therefore caffeine is a kin to adding fire to that node spiral death fear thing people have. Caffeine needs immediate success, or this web2 dependency will get expensive. Obvsiouly charging people is the way to go, that will take time to get adoption. What you won't get is transparency. @dominic_w will not tell you what it has cost in ICP to train caffeine, he won't tell you the cost projections going forwards etc, likely he hasn't done them. The big problem ICP faces is Dom, he doesn't understand what makes cryptocurrencies valuable. He should maybe read the satoshi whitepaper, it's got nothing to do with the tech, it's about taking on corporations and institutions. So when I hear caffeine paying OpenAI, google ai keynote, utopia and dfinty dfinity dfinity - I hear price drop.
@beadle1989 @TakeitLikeaMen @MrAIxICP @dfinity @dominic_w @JanCamenisch @OpenFPL_DAO @caffeineai
100% with only 2022 voting power? Governance on $ICP is crucial. Therefore, this is a critical topic. I am expecting some sort of official statement with a valid explanation.
