Jay Mitchell 🇺🇸
5.8K posts

Jay Mitchell 🇺🇸
@JMitchreal
MAGA for life
United States Katılım Kasım 2023
1K Takip Edilen873 Takipçiler

@WallStreetApes @AthenaMia2nd Gotta have springs and some foam in my bed
English

American shows what’s really inside a $5,000 king size Tempurperix mattress
“This is a $5,000 king-size Tempurpedic mattress — didn't realize that it's just a bunch of foam that is glued together. Not worth anywhere close to $5,000. Look at this. What a joke, what a waste of money”
“I will never buy one of these again, super heavy but complete garbage for $5,000”
It’s crazy they just some foam glued together could cost $5,000…..
This could possibly be another brand based on foam patten but in any case, what a ripoff
English
Jay Mitchell 🇺🇸 retweetledi

You owe the IRS $100,000
They'll take $5,000 and close your file. Permanently. Balance goes to $0
It's called an Offer in Compromise. Form 656. The IRS approved 42% of them last year. Application fee: $205
Here's the exact formula they use to decide your number and how to make sure yours gets accepted
The IRS doesn't want to chase you for 10 years. Collection costs money. Agents cost money. Liens cost money. They'd rather take $5,000 today than spend $50,000 over a decade trying to squeeze $100,000 out of someone who will never have it
That's the entire program. They did the math and built a form for it
The formula:
The IRS calculates your "Reasonable Collection Potential." What they realistically think they can get from you. Your offer needs to meet or beat that number
RCP = (monthly disposable income × remaining collection months) + (asset equity after exemptions)
Monthly disposable income: your gross income minus IRS-allowed expenses. They have specific tables for housing, food, transportation, and healthcare by county. Not YOUR expenses. THEIR approved numbers
If you earn $4,000/month and their table says your allowable expenses are $3,800, your disposable income is $200/month
Remaining months: for a lump sum offer (paid within 5 months), they multiply by 12. For a payment plan (6-24 months), they multiply by 24
Assets: bank accounts, investments, vehicles, property. But they subtract exemptions. Your primary car up to a certain value is exempt. Household furnishings exempt. Retirement accounts often partially exempt
Real case:
Disposable income: $200/month
Asset equity after exemptions: $2,000
Lump sum RCP: ($200 × 12) + $2,000 = $4,400
That's your offer. $4,400 on $100,000 in tax debt. 4.4 cents on the dollar
The forms:
Form 433-A (OIC): full financial disclosure. Income, expenses, assets, bank statements. Every number. Fill it out honestly because they verify everything. Lying on this form is a federal crime and they'll reject your offer AND flag you for audit
Form 656: the offer itself. Your amount. Your payment terms
$205 application fee (waived if income is below 250% of federal poverty level)
Initial payment: 20% of your offer submitted with the application for lump sum. On a $4,400 offer that's $880 upfront
Here's the part that makes this genuinely broken:
While your offer is being reviewed, which takes 6-24 months, ALL collection activity stops. No levies. No liens. No wage garnishment. They legally cannot collect while the OIC is pending
And if the IRS doesn't make a determination within 2 years of receiving your application? Your offer is automatically accepted. Two years of silence = you win by default. That's in the tax code lmao
Client owed $147,000 across 3 tax years. Hadn't filed. Hadn't paid. Getting letters every month. We calculated his RCP at $6,200. Submitted the OIC with $1,240 initial payment
IRS accepted 7 months later
$145,000 in tax debt settled for $6,200. 4.2 cents on the dollar
He went from not opening his mailbox to a $0 IRS balance. Then we fixed his credit. Then we stacked $80K in 0% business funding. Started a pressure washing company 5 months later
The IRS is the scariest creditor in America. They can garnish without a court order. Seize your bank account with no warning. Lien everything you own
But they also built a program where they take your $5,000 and walk away happy
The difference between the person who pays $100,000 and the person who pays $5,000 is knowing Form 656 exists
Now you know
(We fix credit and build capital stacks. If you owe back taxes, handle that first. Then we get you funded. Link in bio)
English

Politicians don't get it. We voted to get rid of illegals above all the other stuff we voted for. So tell me, Floridians, for whom should I vote for governor now that @ByronDonalds has disappointed me?
I often say that I don't to need agree with any politician all the time, but he has crossed the line for me.
English

@SenEricSchmitt I agree on mass amnesty for the American people to never pay taxes again the rest of their natural lives and reparations to those that have been duped for the last 50 yrs. I can agree to that.
English

There's been a lot of talk of mass amnesty for illegal aliens.
My answer is simple, and it’s final: Hell no.
But let’s be clear-eyed about the real crisis. This isn’t just about “illegal” entry.
53.3 million foreign-born people live in the United States of America—roughly 16% of our population and nearly ten times the population of Missouri.
As both a raw number and a percentage of population, we are in uncharted territory. No serious nation pretends it can absorb unlimited numbers at unlimited speed without consequences for wages, schools, housing, hospitals, and the very cohesion of the republic itself. When the foreign-born share surges to levels never seen before, the pressures don’t stop at the border—they flood every community in America. They depress wages for working Americans, they overwhelm our classrooms, they strain public services paid for by citizens who played by the rules.
That is the point too many people in Washington (even some Republicans) refuse to confront. They want to reduce this debate to a legal distinction alone, as if the only problem is unlawful entry.
And yet the people responsible for this situation still talk as if any effort to reduce numbers, tighten standards, advocate for assimilation, or prioritize American citizens is somehow extreme.
It is not extreme for a nation to want order. It is not extreme for a nation to want limits. It is not extreme for a nation to insist that immigration policy serve the national interest instead of the preferences of donors, activists, and multinational employers.
America has every right to have an immigration system that is oriented toward its own people. That means stopping illegal entry, yes. But it also means ending the broader ideology of mass migration that treats record inflows as a sign of virtue and public concern as something to be silenced. If we are serious about preserving our country, we have to be serious about the scale of this challenge.

English

@ThrillaRilla369 They can’t be patented or owned exclusively for their medicinal properties
English

@Ravious101 If insurance companies get overwhelmed with claims from major catastrophes like floods, fires or hurricanes they’ll pack up and disappear out of state and rebrand 6-12 months later under different name. Ie; California fires, Florida, NC hurricanes. It’s a racket
English

@dickballxy @MichelleMaxwell Yes, but not deported, arrested, tried and jailed.
English

@MichelleMaxwell I think the Ilhan Omar case should be prosecuted in a swift and public way to show that the administration means business.
English

@MichelleMaxwell Those that harbored and aided should be sent with the deported.
English

Hi @grok is the American government spraying our skies with chemicals?
English



















