Jasper Raymond

4.1K posts

Jasper Raymond banner
Jasper Raymond

Jasper Raymond

@JRaymondPoetry

You can has it all.

Earth Katılım Haziran 2024
2.3K Takip Edilen532 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
If you’re not into poetry, you just aren’t into life. You have no skin in the game. That’s why never a single soul hasn’t been into poetry. #poetry
English
1
2
25
1.5K
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
“It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.” That would be something like 1 in 40 women of reproductive age. It’s not credible and makes you wonder what kinds of standards these people are applying to establish truth.
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. bit.ly/4uE5odw

English
830
103
2.5K
928.9K
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
@MHConduit @RichardHanania I can’t understand it for you dunce. Maybe if you cared more about your women than jabbing the Americans you leech off of…
English
1
0
8
119
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
@MHConduit @RichardHanania And even 17 years isn’t 1/40. OP thought it was just 1 year. And the study does cite the problem as dating back to the 50s. You’re a rabid dunce with no life.
English
1
0
16
365
Mikail
Mikail@MHConduit·
@JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania americans are illiterate for a large part, it’s genuinely concerning how many of you embarrass yourselves this case is flawed in many ways, but addressing your stupid claim, this “study” was carried between 1997 and 2013 is that 70 years?
Mikail tweet media
English
3
0
3
1.4K
C3
C3@C_3C_3·
The 250,000 UK girls in the Rape Gang Inquiry were ages 10-15… The ages Keir Starmer just banned from the internet. Does it all make sense now?
English
121
2.8K
11.8K
83.6K
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
@RichardHanania The only complete nonsense is your 1/40 claim, which you’re too shameless to retract.
English
0
0
0
250
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
Just keep leeching and relax. Pictures of deep space are wasted on you. I wasn’t counting from 1997, I misread somewhere that it was from the 50s. That’s an error. But even American errors are more valuable than your useless existence. Just marvel at the tech in your hands and get a life chimp.
English
0
0
4
257
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
@RupertLowe10 Nothing matters more to leftists than virtue signaling. Not even the lives of little girls.
English
0
0
1
58
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
The BBC continues to ignore our rape gang inquiry when it’s convenient. But please read this to understand how the bent establishment weaponises its institutions against us… When a malicious complaint was made to Parliament about our fundraising efforts for the inquiry last year, the BBC were leaked it. Obviously. They gave us ten minutes to respond, and then published the story insinuating we had done something wrong. We hadn’t. It was immediately cleared by Parliament, and the BBC was forced to issue an apology. Not before the lie had spread around the country. But. When we held our hearings, zero coverage. Silence. Same for our report now. Nothing. The most comprehensive and honest analysis of the rape gang scandal. Ignored. It clearly is of public interest, because the covered the negative story with such enthusiasm. So can you tell me why they won’t report our findings? The entire establishment wants us to fail. We will not.
English
575
4.8K
24.5K
316.5K
Archetypical
Archetypical@Archetypical20·
@JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania I'm not denying that the real number may be still very high and unacceptable, and perpetrators deserve death penalty. But this number may be used to create an artificial moral panic.
English
1
0
0
35
Shippo
Shippo@entoliberal·
@JRaymondPoetry @RichardHanania The bulk of it happened over half that tine span. Let’s say it was 1%. That still seems high, and in fact the derivation of the estimate is dubious. No one knows the true figure.
English
4
0
5
1.8K
Jasper Raymond
Jasper Raymond@JRaymondPoetry·
Oh okay so I guess 1/40 is correct and you and Richard are the ones that care about girls and science. Just because the report is a bit more vague than a peer reviewed paper doesn’t mean it’s not broadly accurate. Or should we just continue doing what the BBC and UK gov does in totally making it a wash about nothing?
English
1
0
0
42
Archetypical
Archetypical@Archetypical20·
@RichardHanania When they exaggerate like this it shows it's just about propaganda rather than helping victims.
English
4
0
7
744
SilverTuna
SilverTuna@BilboSwaggins84·
@RichardHanania Does 250,000 victims since the 1950's, or 70+ years, equal 1 in every 40?
English
1
0
49
1.1K