

John Saylor
13.3K posts

@JSaylorIII
Leadership @SDMSoftware #CRO #AD @ShieldsUpAI #Security #CISO #MSAP #GRC #DevSecOps #ASPM @ZodiacBusiness #Advisor #BCP #DR #NaturalResourceBroker #H2 #FuelCell





For the benefit of those who haven’t seen the review of the ball hitting the camera cable before England’s equaliser on Fox Sports…




🏴 🇳🇴 NORWAY ROBBED?! A camera wire block Norway’s free kick. It then led to a goal by Jude. By FIFA’s own rules it should’ve been disallowed. 👇🏾 If an outside agent (anything not part of the field, players, or officials — like a camera cable, drone, animal, etc.) interferes with the ball while it’s in play, the referee should stop play and restart with a dropped ball (or indirect free kick in some cases)


🚨🚨 MAJOR BREAKING; According to FIFA,the tracking graph showed no 'peak' indicating the ball did hit the camera 📸 cable in the build-up to England's goal. Norway reject that explanation, pointing to the replays that appear to show the contact. If the ball did strike the cable,the laws of the game required play to be stopped. Do you agree with FIFA's explanation?






Before England’s goal in minute 45+2 against Norway, the sensor in the Connected Ball showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air, and therefore no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball.


Here's another angle:




Here's another angle:







According to IFAB’s laws of the game a camera cable would be considered an “outside agent”. If the ball hit an outside agent, the referee should've stopped the match and restarted play with a drop-ball. #NORENG





Breaking: re the ball possibly hitting camera cable in lead up to England goal, FIFA says they "have checked the data and no peak on the graph from the connected ball heartbeat sensor"