Jordon

48.8K posts

Jordon banner
Jordon

Jordon

@JVO187

Milwaukee, WI Katılım Ağustos 2013
274 Takip Edilen437 Takipçiler
Liana
Liana@liana_1_1·
Nothing wrong with a little public shaming
English
427
298
10K
3.3M
Pat McAfee
Pat McAfee@PatMcAfeeShow·
"The reality of everything in Milwaukee is this... If they spent as much time dealing with their own internal problems as they did responding to accurate reports they wouldn't be in the mess that they're in right now" ~ @ShamsCharania #PMSLive
Pat McAfee@PatMcAfeeShow

"I just report the news and the truth can hurt sometimes.. Giannis and his camp informed the Bucks last May that he was ready to move on.. He thought this roster wasn't good enough and the season played out how it played out" @ShamsCharania #PMSLive

English
270
67
666
820.8K
Jordon retweetledi
Ryan Grim
Ryan Grim@ryangrim·
The wheels are coming off at CNN. What are they doing?
Bobby LaValley@Bobby_LaVallley

CNN's @DanaBashCNN: "Hasan Piker is excusing sexual violence by Hamas terrorists. He also claims Hamas is, quote, 'a thousand times better than Israel.' Hamas is a designated terror organization, not just by the U.S., but by the EU, Canada, Australia, New Zealand."

English
797
1.5K
16.9K
543K
Jordon retweetledi
Ryan Grim
Ryan Grim@ryangrim·
Here’s another complaint from “The Free Press” that a hotel had power while a hospital lost power in Cuba. In case The Free Press is merely ignorant and not actively lying to their audience, I’d remind them that the Trump administration changed its rules so private businesses (like the American-owned hotels that Americans are required to stay in) are allowed to buy imported oil but the government (which means all hospitals) is not allowed to import oil. So now that The Free Press is aware of this fact — and rightly thinks it is wrong to deprive a hospital of fuel — I’m sure they will amend this piece and join the rest of the civilized world in demanding Trump end this illegal oil blockade. Right? That’s what they’ll do won’t they?
The Free Press@TheFP

Viral content creators like Hasan Piker and Ryan Grim were invited for a weekend in a blacked-out Cuba so they could preach the glories of ‘la revolución.’ thefp.com/p/cubas-useles…

English
165
1.9K
12.5K
467.5K
Jordon retweetledi
Jack
Jack@jackunheard·
🚨BREAKING: Kentucky family rejects a $26 million offer to turn their farmland into a data center, roughly 10x the area’s going rate. “If it’s my way, I’ll stay and hold and feed a nation. 26 million doesn’t mean anything.”
English
2.9K
20.9K
233.9K
13.7M
Jordon
Jordon@JVO187·
Just out here trying to build something cool with the homies
English
0
0
0
22
Jordon
Jordon@JVO187·
It’s interesting that there’s a big uptick in people becoming more religious the past few years. That’s how you know the world is a complete shit show right now, historically people always turn to a higher power when times are rough.
English
0
0
0
28
IKE Packers Podcast
IKE Packers Podcast@IKE_Packers·
Brian Gutekunst has ran this franchise into no-man’s land. Jordan Love now stands as the longest tenured Packer, but without displaying the leadership qualities required of him. From extending Rashan Gary and arguably 10 too early, to signing Aaron Banks and Nate Hobbes to $110M+ an offseason ago, it’s hard to see a path to a Super Bowl for this team with Matt LaFleur leading the way. All signs are pointing to a full re-build minus the 3 of Policy, Gute, and LaFleur. Many of who would say didn’t deserve extensions. Now the burden of leadership falls heavier on their shoulders. An all-out gamble on Micah Parsons makes it more critical than ever he balls out for this team. Things getting very interesting in Green Bay
English
222
26
417
251.7K
Jordon
Jordon@JVO187·
When you grow up you realize most people never grow up
English
0
0
2
25
Jordon retweetledi
Financial Physics
Financial Physics@FinancialPhys·
Today is a great day to remind everyone 🙂
English
238
1.6K
6.4K
197.6K
Jordon
Jordon@JVO187·
@mtracey It makes sense why you’re trying to protect pedophiles, you literally look like if every pedo morphed into one person.
English
0
0
1
19
Michael Tracey
Michael Tracey@mtracey·
Here's what I said four days ago about Epstein Hysteria being extremely likely to make mentally unstable people do something homicidally crazy. Today: guy obsessed with Epstein Files tries to launch armed incursion into Mar-a-Lago
English
151
106
1K
64.8K
.
.@ItLandedHere·
@HaterReport He scored 4 points for the Bucks on February 9th. 12 points on February 12th. This will always be his problem. He'll give you a random 34 points one night, and 4 the next. Stop hyping this dude up like the Nets just let prime MJ go. Retard.
English
11
1
23
3.3K
Hater Report
Hater Report@HaterReport·
Cam Thomas just scored 16 STRAIGHT POINTS for the Bucks and the NETS didn’t think he was good enough 😭 I’M NOTHING
English
59
339
7.9K
250.1K
Jordon retweetledi
Bitcoin Teddy
Bitcoin Teddy@Bitcoin_Teddy·
TIM DILLON: “Is Iran the reason that no one can afford a house? Is Iran the reason that there's fentanyl everywhere? … When your insurance won't cover a knee operation … is your main concern Iran? This is the craziest sh*t I've ever heard.”
English
143
3.6K
24.9K
457.4K
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.
Thomas Massie tweet mediaThomas Massie tweet media
English
1.9K
9.4K
62.7K
2.4M
Jordon
Jordon@JVO187·
@zachkruse2 How the hell is that even possible, does he close his eyes during punt returns and FG blocking?
English
0
0
0
148
Zach Kruse
Zach Kruse@zachkruse2·
Brian Gutekunst on Packers special teams: "I have a lot of faith in Rich and what we are doing there."
English
336
15
388
137.2K