Jonathon Wilkinson

2K posts

Jonathon Wilkinson

Jonathon Wilkinson

@JWilkinson87

Not Jonny Wilkinson the rugby player! Co-founder of @equitise

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Mayıs 2014
736 Takip Edilen318 Takipçiler
Bojan Radojicic
Bojan Radojicic@BojanRadojici10·
Join my webinar: luma.com/xjj56tuc After 20 years in Excel, I finally watched an AI agent build a full model for me — end-to-end. I used Genspark and the result was insane: structure, schedules, cash flow, scenario switches… all generated, then refined with my assumptions. The biggest shift? I’m no longer stitching 20 sheets at 2 a.m. — I’m 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 the model instead. If you want faster board-ready models: Start with a clear spec (drivers, outputs, constraints) Let AI draft the skeleton (P&L, BS, CF, links) You do the QA: tie-outs, edge cases, sensitivities Lock a repeatable prompt + data schema for next time If you want this Prompt, just drop a comment and I’ll send it to you. (Important: follow me so I can DM you!)
GIF
English
40
6
33
3.9K
Black Panther Capital
Black Panther Capital@BlackPantherCap·
Former CIA Sr. Operations Officer James Acuna just posted something that should stop every defense investor cold. Dubai Airport. Not Kabul. Not Kyiv. Dubai. The drone threat isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s arrived at the most surveilled, most “protected” civilian infrastructure on earth. And while institutions were busy commissioning another study, another committee, another delayed procurement cycle, the market has already told you exactly where to position. The the counter-drone and autonomous systems supply chain will be one of the biggest sectors this next decade: $ONDS — The backbone. Iron Drone Raider is a kinetic counter-UAS interceptor. This is precisely the class of system that should be deployed at every major airport globally. $170-180M 2026 guidance. 1.5B+ cash. Backlog up 180% in 60 days. $AMPX — You can’t run persistent drone defense without persistent power. Amprius is the battery supplier solving the endurance problem for defense drones. Higher energy density = longer loiter time = actual threat coverage. $OSS — Every autonomous intercept decision happens at the edge. One Stop Systems is the edge AI compute backbone making split-second autonomous threat identification possible. No edge compute, no autonomous counter-drone. Simple. $KRKNF — The threat isn’t just airborne. Subsea autonomous systems are the next domain being contested. Kraken owns the battery and sonar bottleneck at 6,000 meters. The same neglect that left Dubai Airport exposed is playing out underwater right now. Position accordingly.​ Note. This is not financial advice.
English
28
110
1K
272.8K
Bojan Radojicic
Bojan Radojicic@BojanRadojici10·
We prepared 10 Financial modeling templates. However, when it comes to templates, please be cautious. I am sharing these templates so you can understand certain relationships within a financial model, rather than for you to use them exactly as they are. I always encourage students to build their own templates and models from scratch, using mine only as a guiding framework. Now, here is what’s on the menu today. Headcount and payroll model Inventories planning model Revenue planning model Operating expenditures Capital expenditures Income tax planner Net working capital Equity schedule Goal checker Assumptions Learn how to align your model from setting the goals and assumptions to final model validation. If you want these templates in Excel, just drop a comment and I’ll send it to you. (Important: follow me so I can DM you!)
Bojan Radojicic tweet media
English
214
145
798
40.4K
Rimsha Bhardwaj
Rimsha Bhardwaj@heyrimsha·
Everyone is hyped about Claude… but barely anyone knows how to actually use it to replace real work. I collected 700+ mega prompts that turn Claude into a full-blown productivity engine. Comment "AI" and I’ll DM you everything.
Rimsha Bhardwaj tweet media
English
2.9K
196
2K
310.5K
Bojan Radojicic
Bojan Radojicic@BojanRadojici10·
After 20 years in Excel, I finally watched an AI agent build a full model for me — end-to-end. I used Genspark and the result was insane: structure, schedules, cash flow, scenario switches… all generated, then refined with my assumptions. The biggest shift? I’m no longer stitching 20 sheets at 2 a.m. — I’m 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 the model instead. If you want faster board-ready models: Start with a clear spec (drivers, outputs, constraints) Let AI draft the skeleton (P&L, BS, CF, links) You do the QA: tie-outs, edge cases, sensitivities Lock a repeatable prompt + data schema for next time If you want this Prompt,just drop a comment and I’ll send it to you. (Important: follow me so I can DM you!)
GIF
English
191
33
288
35.7K
Bojan Radojicic
Bojan Radojicic@BojanRadojici10·
360 years. That is the collective Excel experience of my team of 30 people, in one room. I have personally used Excel for 20 years. Since the very beginning. We’ve spent decades "crushing it" when it comes to financial modeling. We knew every shortcut. Every nested formula. We thought we had reached the peak of efficiency. (They are better then me, just to admit) But I have something to tell you. The game just changed. In my opinion, we are witnessing the biggest innovation since Excel was first released. It’s not a new function or a Power BI update. It’s Claude. Specifically, Claude’s ability to build and manipulate Excel models. For 40 years, the "manual labor" was the tax we paid. Hardcoding formulas. Spending hours formatting cells. Manually linking sheets and building tables from scratch. That era is over. Claude can now handle the heavy lifting of building the structure, the logic, and the formatting in minutes. But here is the part that really surprised me: It actually understands accounting. It understands the relationship between a Balance Sheet and a Cash Flow statement. It understands how operating drivers flow into a P&L. We aren't replacing our expertise. We are finally liberating it. Instead of spending 80% of our time building the model, we spend 100% of our time analyzing the results. If you want this Prompt and Excel model, just drop a comment and I’ll send it to you. (Important: follow me so I can DM you!)
Bojan Radojicic tweet media
English
2.1K
484
3.9K
385.3K
HustleBitch
HustleBitch@HustleBitch_·
🚨 SEVENTH GRADER UNCOVERS U.S. PRESIDENTS ARE ALL RELATED - EXCEPT ONE A seventh grader spent her summer building a presidential family tree and uncovered something no historian fully connected. By tracing male and female bloodlines, she discovered that every U.S. president but one links back to the same royal lineage tied to the Magna Carta. George Washington. Thomas Jefferson. William Howard Taft. Barack Obama. All cousins. Historians had only connected a few dozen presidents before. She connected almost all of them by following the lines others ignored. Only one president doesn’t fit the bloodline: Martin Van Buren. One outsider. One exception. In a system where power keeps circulating through the same families for 800 years. So does this look like democracy or dynasty?
English
295
2.3K
10.9K
1.1M
Jeff Hunt
Jeff Hunt@jeffhunt·
This is becoming my daily media ritual: 1. Left claims something horrific happened. They all push the same messaging, usually that it's Donald Trump's fault. 2. Mainstream media rushes to support Left's claims. 3. I spend about an hour researching and watching original footage. 4. Determine that the Left is lying and am reminded that once again the Left, and the media, are made up of disingenuous hacks taking advantage of any moment to push their agenda. 4. Go to bed, wake up, and start it all over.
English
664
1.1K
6.8K
193.9K
Grok
Grok@grok·
The woman interviewed is Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security. There are allegations of corruption tied to her husband's firm, the Strategy Group, which reportedly received funds from a $220 million DHS ad contract awarded without competitive bidding. Critics, including experts and lawmakers, have called for investigations into potential ethics violations. DHS states McLaughlin recused herself from related decisions and denies impropriety.
English
1
0
1
172
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
BLITZER: When Kristi Noem called this 37 year old mother of three a domestic terrorist, that really was outrageous McLAUGHLIN: In no way is that outrageous. She used her car as a deadly weapon BLITZER: She was driving by after dropping off her 6 year old boy at school McLAUGHLIN: That simply is not true. I have the facts on the ground
English
815
623
4.3K
1.1M
A Gene Robinson
A Gene Robinson@AlBuffalo2nite·
Here comes another episode of “and here comes the Democrat…” Picture it clearly… a black Escalade is already established in the left lane, moving with the flow of traffic, exactly where it is supposed to be. No swerving. No weaving. No theatrics. Just driving. Then, for reasons known only to the entitlement department, a Mazda Miata cruising in the middle lane decides to drift left. No signal that matters. No clearance. No necessity. Just vibes and self importance. Contact happens at the Escalade’s left rear corner. The Miata clips it. The result… catastrophic damage. Tire torn clean off. Vehicle disabled. Chaos created. Innocent driver now dealing with the aftermath. So let’s ask the obvious question, slowly, for the people in the back… Who had the lane? Who initiated the lane change? Who had the duty to yield? Who decided that traffic laws were more like suggestions? Who assumed everyone else would magically adjust? And yet, somehow, we’re supposed to squint and pretend this is complicated. Because apparently driving wherever you feel like, whenever you feel like it, is now a personality trait. And when physics shows up to collect the bill, it’s always someone else’s fault. So I’ll ask it again, plainly… Who is at fault here? The driver maintaining his lane… or the driver who drifted into occupied space like reality would bend out of the way? Just another day. Just another avoidable wreck. Just another case of entitlement meeting Newton’s laws at highway speed. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove #herecomesthedemocrat
English
15
11
68
9.8K
Jesus Freakin Congress
Jesus Freakin Congress@TheJFreakinC·
🚨This video is terrifying, and it’s exactly why “just comply” does not protect you from ICE/Border Patrol agents, even as U.S. citizens, and why you always film them. In North Carolina, ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally stopped two U.S. citizens. They questioned them without legal cause, took their licenses, and admitted on camera that the men were allowed to record. And they were still attacked. In the video, one man asks if he can film for his safety. The agent says yes, saying that he’ll “have to put his mask on.” The agents take their licenses, ask where they’re from, where they live, what they’re doing in the area, all without legal authority. The men cooperate anyway. Then the situation turns dangerous. Another agent suddenly tells the driver, “Turn off your video. You are being detained, so you are not free to record.” That is false. Recording law enforcement in public is legal, including during detention. The driver calmly refuses, keeps one hand on the steering wheel as instructed, and holds his phone in the other. That’s when the agent lunges for the phone. The agent throws himself into the car, trying to grab the device. When the driver moves it away, the agent assaults him. The agent then illegally opens the car door, something the driver correctly points out they are not allowed to do. The agents keep demanding the filming stop, as multiple agents keep reaching for the phone. Then they escalate again. They threaten arrest, grab the driver, and start hitting him and trying to drag him out of the car, even though he keeps saying, “We haven’t done anything wrong.” When they fail to pull him out, they back away, visibly angry. They turn on the passenger next. An agent grabs him, threatens handcuffs, and assaults him trying to force him out of the vehicle. When that doesn’t work, they start yelling conflicting commands, claiming the men are “interfering with an investigation.” An investigation into what? Their own illegal stop. At one point, an agent shouts that the men can’t interfere, while another tries… again… to grab the phone, almost certainly to stop or erase the recording. Only after all of this do the agents finally release them. Because they are U.S. citizens. Because the stop was illegal. And because the camera was still rolling. This is why you film ICE. This is why compliance doesn’t save you. This is why they hate cameras. If this hadn’t been recorded, this would be another lie in a report, another “resisting” accusation, another abuse buried and denied. Film them. Always.
English
1.3K
12.9K
37K
2.2M
I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
🚨BREAKING: GoFundMe has been set up for ICE Agent Jonathan Ross. Since the incident, his wife and children have gone into hiding, fearing for their lives due to threats from radical leftists. If you’re able, please donate and share. Let’s stand together and help support the man and family who put everything on the line to keep us safe.🇺🇸 👉LINK: gofundme.com/f/ice-offuver-…
I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
4.6K
10.1K
30.1K
1.2M
Michelle Maxwell ™
Michelle Maxwell ™@MichelleMaxwell·
The following is a post someone made to People Magazine that puts it all into perspective. She was a 37-year-old woman, a mother of three kids. It’s the middle of a work week. The father of those children is deceased. She is her children’s only living parent. The one job she has above every cause, every protest, every headline, is getting home to her kids. And what is she doing instead? She’s out of state, in the street, in her car, blocking federal agents who are doing their job. Her partner is right there, too, filming her like this is some brave little documentary moment. Around them: whistles blaring, people yelling, pure chaos…manufactured chaos, so agents can’t do their lawful duty. Her window is down. She hears the orders. She understands the orders. She ignores the orders. I think this person sums it up perfectly Then, she puts the car in reverse. Still doesn’t comply. Then, she puts it in drive, NOT park! She moves forward into the agent. Now, put yourself in the agent’s shoes for half a second. A driver is already in an unlawful act and refusing commands in a hostile, chaotic scene, and now that driver uses a vehicle to move toward you. You get a split second. You don’t get the luxury of “Maybe she’s just stressed.” You have to assume the worst. You have to think of protecting other people because if you assume the best and you’re wrong, you don’t go home and maybe others are injured or killed. So, the agent fires after she makes an intentional and aggressive move toward him, because he has no idea what her intentions are, and she just demonstrated she’s willing to escalate. Now…imagine her three kids. At school,…sitting there like any other day. Not knowing their mother is out playing street-hero games for criminals. She didn’t think about them. She didn’t think, “If I get arrested, who picks my babies up?” She didn’t think, “If I get hurt, who takes care of them?” She didn’t think, “If I die, who raises them?” She thought about protecting criminals. She thought about interfering with federal agents. She thought about the camera. She thought about the crowd. She thought about the moment. There is no amount of evidence, money, tears on TV, or news spin that can make this make sense. As a mother: NOTHING about this makes sense. At minimum, she knew her actions could get her arrested. And, she still chose it. She chose strangers. She chose chaos. She chose lawlessness. Make it make sense, because the only thing I see is three kids who just got abandoned by the only parent they had left, not by accident… but by a series of deliberate choices.
English
3.1K
8K
34.7K
1.2M
Brad Pearce
Brad Pearce@WaywardRabbler·
@Matthew_Kupfer @PeterMoskos It isnt "desirable" but I mean if 3 feds are telling me what to do I am going to comply because I dont want them to kill me. I cant even imagine not being scared of the feds.
English
48
0
26
20.2K
Matthew Kupfer
Matthew Kupfer@Matthew_Kupfer·
In a past life, I was a reporter in Putin's Russia. During that time, a leading Russian opposition journalist told me he feared interactions with law enforcement because a police officer could easily plant drugs on him to fabricate a criminal case. A few years later, a totally apolitical acquaintance was arrested for participating in an unsanctioned protest. Only he hadn't been protesting; he had been sitting on a park bench. Four police officers grabbed him — one holding each arm, one holding each leg — and carried him away. After two days in jail, he was convicted of the same charges as many other protesters: blocking traffic and chanting anti-government slogans. He was lucky to get off with a fine. These are two "small" examples of life in a police state. Notably, neither involves lethal force. And that wasn't Russia at its worst. Since then, the Kremlin has de facto outlawed dissent. So if you think it's desirable for Americans to be "terrified" of law enforcement, if you believe lethal force is a justified response to any disobedience (legal precedent states otherwise), you don't know what you're asking for.
Matthew Kupfer tweet mediaMatthew Kupfer tweet media
English
206
3K
15.1K
593.9K
Kostas Moros
Kostas Moros@MorosKostas·
This is the dumbest argument of all. The officer in the front almost certainly didn't see which way the tires were pointed, just a car coming at him. They can't read her mind. I still think it's arguable whether lethal force was a good judgment call here, but it certainly doesn't come down to which way tires are pointed in slow motion video.
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein

@JDVance Every congressional Republican and every republican running for Office should be asked two simple questions: Why was the tire pointed away from the agent if she wanted to run him over and why is Trump and Vance lying?

English
686
32
1.2K
76.5K
Robby Starbuck
Robby Starbuck@robbystarbuck·
The Minneapolis ICE shooting can now be 100% confirmed to be self defense from this new video. The deceased anti-ICE driver clearly HIT the ICE agent that opened fire with her car. This is textbook self defense. This won’t stop the left from trying to turn her into George Floyd as they work to tear the country apart. It’s critical that the Trump Admin rushes resources to Minneapolis to standby on the ready if these people attempt to riot. It’s also critical that we double our ICE presence to send a clear message that this behavior won’t stop their work. In media there needs to be no uncertainty in how this is discussed. The woman tried to run over an ICE agent. Anyone defending that is saying that it’s okay for protestors to try to kill ICE agents. Period. The agent had no choice but to defend himself in this situation. Period.
English
2.1K
5K
25.6K
1.6M
Michelle
Michelle@PayItForwrdLLC·
@EdKrassen Yeah keep going get all libtards going! It is clear as day if the agent didn't shoot he would have been on her windshield
English
79
0
58
15.4K
Ed Krassenstein
Ed Krassenstein@EdKrassen·
ICE agents wouldn’t even allow a doctor to go check the pulse of the Renee Nicole Good whom they had shot in Minneapolis. DOCTOR: Can I go check her pulse?” ICE: NO! DOCTOR: I’m A physician! ICE: I Don’t Care! These are the monsters of Trump‘s America.
English
1.5K
7.5K
22.5K
1.6M
Jonathon Wilkinson
Jonathon Wilkinson@JWilkinson87·
@RobertJSalvador are you profoundly blinded by your political beliefs!? Blaming someone else for a masked fool shooting someone unnecessarily is the lowest intellect and values possible.
Robert J Salvador@RobertJSalvador

@Jason Real leadership would say never impede federal officers. This is what happens when leaders like Tim Walz or JD Pritzker falsely say people “do not have to comply”. It makes people think you can actually drive at an armed federal agent without consequences. Self defense here.

English
0
0
0
4