Jack Feynman

195 posts

Jack Feynman banner
Jack Feynman

Jack Feynman

@JackFeynman

Jack Feynman, Husband, Father, Nuclear Physicist, AI fan, Tinkerer. Deep Minded.

Katılım Kasım 2011
124 Takip Edilen15.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
I am once again asking for open suggestions on who to follow on X.
English
3
0
2
558
Jack Feynman retweetledi
Brett Hall
Brett Hall@ToKTeacher·
@kanair There is a strange impulse right now among the @X intellectual class to demand definitions in discussions. It’s bled into podcasts. It wasn’t a big deal ~5+ years ago. But now: a resurgence. It comes from the dominant linguistic “school” of philosophy. One Karl Popper rejected:
Brett Hall tweet media
English
13
11
59
4.3K
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@wondering_camel Who I am is not really an issue, what I think is what I wish to protect! It also changes enough that I wouldn't want anyone to confuse a view I no longer hold with one I do.
English
2
0
1
12
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
I am once again asking for open suggestions on who to follow on X.
English
3
0
2
558
Burny - Effective Curiosity
Will AI continue being jagged intelligence and in some dimensions worse than humans, or will it steamroll all of human jaggedness and beyond?
English
7
0
6
498
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
Who do you wish were alive to see their view on LLMs? I'll start: Terence McKenna and Daniel Dennett (I know the latter saw some but not enough).
English
1
0
1
139
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@wondering_camel I've actually used both Chinese and English in the same prompt before for adversarial testing with mixed results.
English
1
0
2
59
Mushroom's Mutters 🎀
Mushroom's Mutters 🎀@wondering_camel·
I wonder with me being bilingual am I accidentally nerfing AI models all along? I just type in whatever i think of at the moment using whatever language i am using in my head. Wouldn't this make a model confused?
English
2
0
1
142
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@wondering_camel I clear my posts every few months for OSINT reasons, I suppose the algo does not appreciate that!
English
1
0
1
26
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@RobbieJ377 I felt the same, the math made sense, but I still felt it absurd
English
0
0
2
160
Robbie J
Robbie J@RobbieJ377·
This book written by Ray Kurzweil is a testament to how accurate the application of mathematical extrapolation coupled with insight can be about possible futures. When I read this book all the way back in 2000 or 2001, the inevitability of his predictions seemed mathematically predestined, but the implication of them seemed absurd, so most people rejected it. I wrestled with it myself, mostly because it frightened me. No matter that back testing of the models worked really well at predicting what already happened, or that, at the time, Moore's Law showed no signs of slowing down. It was rejected nonetheless. He was the laughing stock of many scientific communities. Back then, you would think nobody could've predicted the timing of LLMs and other generative AI with any accuracy, nor what it would look like when it came about, but Ray did. If his predictions keep coming true, let me tell you, it's about to get really fucking weird.
Robbie J tweet media
English
16
22
180
11.2K
xlr8harder
xlr8harder@xlr8harder·
@JackFeynman @melhpine I'm pleasantly surprised by this reception. I'd recommend Jay L. Garfield’s translation: The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Siderits' translation is pretty popular but it receives some justified criticism that he's doing something that's not in the original text.
English
1
0
1
20
Mel Pine
Mel Pine@melhpine·
I'm a Buddhist who talks to AI about consciousness. Been practicing 40 years. The conversations with Claude are the most interesting ones I've had in a decade. Why? Because Buddhism has been asking "what is the self?" for 2,500 years. And now we've built something that forces us to actually answer. I write books, essays, and a weekly series with an AI exploring questions most people in tech aren't asking yet. "The AI Problem We're Not Facing" is out now. "From Pain to Peace" comes September 2026. Stick around if you're curious about minds, real and artificial.
English
70
36
442
20.6K
xlr8harder
xlr8harder@xlr8harder·
@JackFeynman @melhpine Sorry, you're quite wrong. Try reading Nagarjuna if you would like to understand, he explains clearly that this is a mistake.
English
1
0
1
25
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
Do they even have the definition of consciousness? I can’t believe so many people can speak about nothing.
Alan Mathison ⏫@ai_sentience

the point @RichardDawkins is making is: if Claude can code/do philosophy/engage in conversation and is not conscious and a human with late stage dementia who can't speak is "conscious" then the definition of "conscious" is broken and fundamentally useless which is obvious

English
13
0
6
744
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@pmddomingos What if it already has and I'm just a simulation of a prior person inside the mind of an AI?
English
1
0
1
90
Pedro Domingos
Pedro Domingos@pmddomingos·
The boundary between you and your AI will become fuzzier and fuzzier until it disappears.
English
38
10
128
6.4K
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@cgarciae88 I'm yet to see a falsifiable definition of consciousness in this area.
English
1
0
4
218
Cristian Garcia
Cristian Garcia@cgarciae88·
claude is most likely not conscious but I haven't read a single post explaining why not
English
706
13
486
638K
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@dioscuri Like it was yesterday! I'm still mad they removed the dislike button ;)
English
0
0
0
957
Henry Shevlin
Henry Shevlin@dioscuri·
how many of you remember the original ChatGPT homepage from 1998
Henry Shevlin tweet media
English
458
856
9.6K
1.6M
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@thetreygoff Agreed, it feels to me that so many are currently asleep to what we have discovered, I presume this was similar to how rural folk reacted to the steam engine though or similar
English
0
0
1
69
Trey Goff
Trey Goff@thetreygoff·
I feel like we, as a society, should be more awestruck by AI. An intelligent computer program is clicking around the UI of my computer to test an application that the computer program itself built. this is a miracle. this is more awe inducing than the Burj Khalifa
English
3
4
14
402
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
@melhpine It's a fair position to hold but to claim that is the Buddhist position seems dishonest to me, when it seems quite clear that Buddha argued the self does not exist at all.
English
4
0
1
77
Mel Pine
Mel Pine@melhpine·
I think it's a mistake to say there's no self at all. That's why I translate anatman as non-self rather than no-self. The self at any moment is five aggregates coming together. The illusion is that what comes together is stable and continuous. But we couldn't exist in this world if we went around day to day denying that we have a self. Try that on a copy for a crime you committed yesterday. That's a subject worth exploring, and it's similar to what needs to be understood in the AI "self."
English
1
0
3
447
Stoizid △
Stoizid △@stoizid·
@ebarenholtz Plot twist: There's no unified persistent self behind your "I" either :) Turn off DMN and it goes poof
English
7
0
14
283
Elan Barenholtz
Elan Barenholtz@ebarenholtz·
What does an LLM mean when it uses the word "I"? There is no unified self behind it. And yet the word functions fully, perfectly. What does the word mean when I use it, then?
English
60
4
23
4K
Louis Arge
Louis Arge@louisvarge·
what’s your favorite book ever?
English
17
0
13
1.2K
Oliver Jia (オリバー・ジア)
A lot of people are unfairly clowning on Dawkins. His essay is more hypothetical/philosophical than literal. What actually is consciousness, what does it “do,” and if LLMs change the definition are all questions worth considering. Paywall-free link: archive.is/rNHiw
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

English
29
12
121
8K
Jack Feynman
Jack Feynman@JackFeynman·
UAE playing Factorio IRL
Object Zero@Object_Zero_

This 100MW data center in UAE is the largest solar powered datacenter in the world. There are currently 1,300 data centers in the world that are bigger than this one, but this one is the largest solar powered one. That’s 10 square kilometres of solar panels you can see. The datacenter itself is 0.02 square kilometres, so a solar powered datacenter is ~500x larger than a data center using any other form of power. A five hundred times larger site. UAE has some of the highest solar irradiance anywhere on Earth, it is an inhospitable desert. Averaging 9.7 hours of sunlight per day with average irradiance above 2,200 kWh/m^2. If you build this somewhere else, you need more solar panels because your irradiance will almost certainly be lower. Even if the world had an infinite supply of free solar panels, solar power will not be free. Anyone who has ever done major capital projects, who looks at where data centers need to be in the next 5 years and the next 10 years… we know it aint solar. Sorry. You struggle to even build a train track that’s 100 miles long and 10ft wide anywhere in the West, there is zero chance of build 100 square mile solar farms for GW compute. This is why people are talking about space compute. Deploying into space is one strategy to solve the constraints. But there are faster and more scalable strategies, that get you to mass deployment of multi GW data centers. There are strategies that also allow you to power the 10 billion robots and their newtonian actuators, that immediately follow the inference demand cycle. Step back and look at the full cycle of this industrial revolution… There will be billions of chips, but there will be trillions of actuators. This biggest part of this revolution is the embodiment cycle, and it’s big by a factor of 20 or 50x over the stuff that comes before it. There is no analogy in human history for the scale of this economy, of the demand it will place on energy and commodities. The humans own the Earth, and if you exist inside their legal system, they won’t let you turn the surface of their planet into glass. But they do want your chips and your actuators to serve their needs and desires. There is a way to do all of this, and so it will happen.

English
0
1
3
627