Jack Feynman
195 posts

Jack Feynman
@JackFeynman
Jack Feynman, Husband, Father, Nuclear Physicist, AI fan, Tinkerer. Deep Minded.
Katılım Kasım 2011
124 Takip Edilen15.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jack Feynman retweetledi

@wondering_camel Who I am is not really an issue, what I think is what I wish to protect! It also changes enough that I wouldn't want anyone to confuse a view I no longer hold with one I do.
English

@JackFeynman Feynman - physicist - real image, bro is not hiding it
English

@wondering_camel I've actually used both Chinese and English in the same prompt before for adversarial testing with mixed results.
English

@wondering_camel I clear my posts every few months for OSINT reasons, I suppose the algo does not appreciate that!
English

@JackFeynman The fuck why are you have like 15k and each post only averaging 300 viewers or smth
English

@RobbieJ377 I felt the same, the math made sense, but I still felt it absurd
English

This book written by Ray Kurzweil is a testament to how accurate the application of mathematical extrapolation coupled with insight can be about possible futures. When I read this book all the way back in 2000 or 2001, the inevitability of his predictions seemed mathematically predestined, but the implication of them seemed absurd, so most people rejected it. I wrestled with it myself, mostly because it frightened me. No matter that back testing of the models worked really well at predicting what already happened, or that, at the time, Moore's Law showed no signs of slowing down. It was rejected nonetheless. He was the laughing stock of many scientific communities. Back then, you would think nobody could've predicted the timing of LLMs and other generative AI with any accuracy, nor what it would look like when it came about, but Ray did. If his predictions keep coming true, let me tell you, it's about to get really fucking weird.

English

@xlr8harder @melhpine I'm always open to learning, especially when I'm potentially wrong!
English

@JackFeynman @melhpine I'm pleasantly surprised by this reception.
I'd recommend Jay L. Garfield’s translation: The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way.
Siderits' translation is pretty popular but it receives some justified criticism that he's doing something that's not in the original text.
English

I'm a Buddhist who talks to AI about consciousness. Been practicing 40 years. The conversations with Claude are the most interesting ones I've had in a decade.
Why? Because Buddhism has been asking "what is the self?" for 2,500 years. And now we've built something that forces us to actually answer.
I write books, essays, and a weekly series with an AI exploring questions most people in tech aren't asking yet.
"The AI Problem We're Not Facing" is out now.
"From Pain to Peace" comes September 2026.
Stick around if you're curious about minds, real and artificial.
English

@JackFeynman @melhpine Sorry, you're quite wrong. Try reading Nagarjuna if you would like to understand, he explains clearly that this is a mistake.
English

@matterasmachine I've got no idea, it points at nothing as far as I can tell!
English

@JackFeynman And what is soul? Current state of neural system?
English

Do they even have the definition of consciousness?
I can’t believe so many people can speak about nothing.
Alan Mathison ⏫@ai_sentience
the point @RichardDawkins is making is: if Claude can code/do philosophy/engage in conversation and is not conscious and a human with late stage dementia who can't speak is "conscious" then the definition of "conscious" is broken and fundamentally useless which is obvious
English

@pmddomingos What if it already has and I'm just a simulation of a prior person inside the mind of an AI?
English

@cgarciae88 I'm yet to see a falsifiable definition of consciousness in this area.
English

@dioscuri Like it was yesterday! I'm still mad they removed the dislike button ;)
English

Source: Reddit
“What if ChatGPT launched in 1998?”
reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comm…
English

@thetreygoff Agreed, it feels to me that so many are currently asleep to what we have discovered, I presume this was similar to how rural folk reacted to the steam engine though or similar
English

@melhpine It's a fair position to hold but to claim that is the Buddhist position seems dishonest to me, when it seems quite clear that Buddha argued the self does not exist at all.
English

I think it's a mistake to say there's no self at all. That's why I translate anatman as non-self rather than no-self. The self at any moment is five aggregates coming together. The illusion is that what comes together is stable and continuous. But we couldn't exist in this world if we went around day to day denying that we have a self. Try that on a copy for a crime you committed yesterday. That's a subject worth exploring, and it's similar to what needs to be understood in the AI "self."
English

@ebarenholtz Plot twist: There's no unified persistent self behind your "I" either :)
Turn off DMN and it goes poof
English

@OliverJia1014 Dennett already did all this heavy lifting years ago
English

A lot of people are unfairly clowning on Dawkins. His essay is more hypothetical/philosophical than literal. What actually is consciousness, what does it “do,” and if LLMs change the definition are all questions worth considering.
Paywall-free link: archive.is/rNHiw
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins
#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-…
I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed. English









