Jack Strand
635 posts

Jack Strand
@JackStrand5
QB for MSUM Football🐉🔴⚪️ #715

11 personnel is still the operating foundation of college football. In this sample, it accounted for 65.4% of all offensive snaps. Add 12 personnel, and those two groupings alone make up 87.3% of the offensive structure. Defenses are being forced to live in the nickel world while still fitting the box against tight end surfaces. The modern offense is not just “spread.” It is spread structure with enough attached surface variation to keep the defense from getting comfortable. The more interesting trend is hidden inside the two-back data. Two-back football does not automatically mean fullback football anymore. In 20 personnel, 86.6% of the snaps came with 2 HB / 0 FB. In 21 personnel, 72.4% came from 2 HB / 0 FB. Even in 22 personnel, more than half of the snaps came without a true fullback. That changes the conversation. If a defense hears “21” and immediately thinks old-school fullback, base personnel, and downhill insert fits, it may be wrong. Modern two-back structures can create motion stress, empty shifts, split-flow conflict, option variation, angle routes, wheels, and matchup problems without changing the personnel tag. Personnel is only the starting point. The real question is what the offense can make the defense declare after the grouping is announced.




















I don't think I had fully appreciated how this works, but it's obvious now. NASA is aiming for a point in space where they know the moon will be. Like throwing to a receiver, but on a somewhat larger and faster scale.











