Jackson
3.8K posts

Jackson
@Jacks644
Building the future of commerce & finance - https://t.co/0XXakczbK9 and https://t.co/rQcR3f602a
San Francisco, CA Katılım Kasım 2017
1.9K Takip Edilen488 Takipçiler

Designers and engineers are rising to the occasion. @ndstudio
youtube.com/watch?v=5rcKQm…

YouTube
English

Wild... can't believe this got done!
This might be the #1 thing President Trump will be remembered for.
The White House@WhiteHouse
TOMORROW: Trump Accounts, on your phone. 💰 Manage everything. Watch the growth. All in ONE place.
English

@SawyerMerritt It just had to be an American pope this time around.
This guy is doing all the American things 🇺🇸
English

@sourceryy @dkhos People are really sleeping on Codex for whatever reason. It’s so so good.
English

Uber CEO @dkhos says AI is " changing how we build in every single way."
"Our developers are all using Claude. Actually Codex is pretty cool as well."
"We're seeing the number of diffs per developer go up and the number of lines per diff go up as well."
"There's a lot of input going in and a lot of productivity coming out from our engineers."
English

@end3of6days9 Every little girl needs something special during the holidays.
English

This man goes out to lunch with a couple of friends and runs into a waitress who recognized him from almost a decade earlier.
Back then, during Thanksgiving, he had stepped in to help her and her mom when their EBT card didn’t work at the grocery store. Not only did he pay for their food, but he also made sure the little girl got the Sweet Tart roll she had been wanting — telling her, “Every little girl should have something special during the holidays.”
Years later, that small act of kindness had stayed with her. Her mom had since passed away from breast cancer, but she never forgot what he did. She ended up comping their entire lunch that day — and his friend left her a $300 tip.
The smallest acts of kindness can ripple through someone’s life for years in ways we may never know.
Have you ever had someone do something kind for you that you still think about years later?
English

Ok now with the weekend behind us, I really don’t understand why he didn’t attend his son’s wedding.
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47
English

White smoke seen billowing out of the data centers
Disclose.tv@disclosetv
NOW - Pope XIV says the church and Anthropic, will work together to "find the way for humanity, in this time of artificial intelligence."
English


HipHopCrave@TheHipHopCrave
For the first time this decade, Billboard Hot 100 went several weeks with zero female rappers on the chart — a rare drought that lasted roughly 2–3 months. This week, @NickiMinaj breaks the silence.“Beauty And A Beat” (with @JustinBieber) is re-entering the Hot 100. The Queen just ended the female rap drought without any new music out 👑 #NickiMinaj #BeautyAndABeat #HipHopCrave
ZXX

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI.
The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace.
They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up:
Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it.
Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived.
Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead.
The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much.
Uber's story is even worse...
Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April.
Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems.
Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session.
The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money.
Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote:
"For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees."
This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans.
Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative.
Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing:
AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs.
The stock market rewarded every company that said it.
Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up.
But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill.
Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools.
Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible.
Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone.
And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control.
The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP.
This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in.
$725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work.
What do you think?
English

Since @ChatGPTapp came out, everything has just been moving at lightning speed. You can’t even sit down and celebrate a breakthrough before @Google , @OpenAI , @AnthropicAI , @xai , or whoever drops the next model that’s just as powerful — or already beating yours. And internally? Labs are already testing stuff that makes today’s “state-of-the-art” look like slop and everyone is rushing to use or try out the next new model.
The competition is so fierce that novelty evaporates in days.
English









