Jackson
2.1K posts
Kung issubtract natin ang total ng pera na pumasok sa bangko ni VP Sara Duterte at Mans Carpio na 4.425 billion at outflow na 1.554 billion mula sa report ng AMLC, lumalabas na may 2.871 billion pa sila.
Pero sa 2024 SALN ni VP Sara, 88 million lang ang naka deklara? Eh bilyonaryo pala sila.
Filipino
English
@PerciCen Posting another person’s bank account details without their consent is a serious violation of the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173) in the Philippines.
@ChelDiokno Atty. paki-guide naman po si Madam Perci. Sayang ang 20M++ sa pwesto n’ya. ☕️☕️☕️
English
Bakit ayaw pabuksan ni VP Sara ang bank accounts niya kung wala siyang tinatago? Sobrang laki ba ng perang nakadeposit?
Kung wala naman siyang sabit bakit parang allergic siya sa transparency?
These are just a few of the questions we deserve an answer from VP Sara.
Filipino
Alagang gluta drip by @RiseandRenew26 at massage wellness by @infinity_spa_ph
Ikaw… pwede ba kitang alagaan?
Filipino
De Lima slams VP Duterte’s absence from impeachment hearing as ‘disrespect’
Liberal Party-list Rep. Leila de Lima on Wednesday criticized Vice President Sara Duterte for skipping the House Committee on Justice hearing on impeachment complaints, calling the move a sign of disrespect toward the constitutional process.
De Lima said that while a respondent is not required to agree with the proceedings, basic respect for the institution handling the inquiry is expected. She noted that Duterte’s absence, coupled with what she described as an unclear letter from her legal counsel, failed to meet that minimum standard.
She emphasized that the committee hearing is not yet a full impeachment trial but functions more like a preliminary investigation focused on determining probable cause. As such, she argued that invoking trial-level rights at this stage is misplaced.
De Lima also echoed earlier remarks from committee leaders that non-participation in impeachment proceedings could be viewed as undermining public accountability, given the formal constitutional nature of the process.
English
Are you tired after a whole week of hard work?
Get relaxed and pampered this weekend! @4southhub is the Best Place to Hangout and Relax 😌🤗 Promise Di ka magsisisi😉
English
QME
@succubus_20 Lol pagpabor sainyo puring puri nyo pag hindi itak kayo. Lol
Filipino
Ganito ka corrupt ang SC
Now u know why Digong needS to be tried in ICC
English
I was not surprised. Let’s all remember who these Duterte justices are! 😏
English
@RommelFLopez Maging justice muna po kayo sa supreme court. Kala ko ba respect the supreme court decision?
Filipino
The Supreme Court did not interpret the Constitution.
It re-wrote the Constitution.
Isn't this evidence of its violation of the Constitution? Isn't this a ground for their impeachment?
Terry Ridon@terryridon
PH Supreme Court redefines long established doctrine on impeachment proceedings: The 1987 Constitution states — In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed. Despite the unequivocal text of the 1987 Constitution defining direct transmital to the Senate upon the filing of a verified complaint or resolution of impeachment by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the Supreme Court now requires the following: A. Prior to direct transmittal to the Senate of any article of impeachment, the House of Representatives should afford due process to an impeachable officer by providing a copy of the Articles of Impeachment and accompanying evidence. B. Prior to direct transmittal to the Senate of any article of impeachment, the House of Representatives should afford due process to an impeachable officer by providing an opportunity to respond to the impeachment charges. C. Prior to direct transmittal to the Senate of any article of impeachment, all House Members should be given copies of the Articles of Impeachment and the comments of the impeachable officer. D. Prior to direct transmittal to the Senate of any article of impeachment, the House should deliberate on the matter. E. Prior to direct transmittal to the Senate of any article of impeachment, the House should have a qualified vote of 1/3 of all Members to transmit the articles of impeachment to the Senate.
English