Jake

2.1K posts

Jake banner
Jake

Jake

@Jake_M_Wilson

UoL Theoretical Physics

Jersey City, NJ Katılım Mayıs 2016
821 Takip Edilen59 Takipçiler
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@notadampaul @Pacem_tw @smashdirt @ViralManager Basically, your description of physics neccesarily depends on the scale that you want to describe. A classical description is useless at the quantum level and vice versa.
English
0
0
0
47
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@notadampaul @Pacem_tw @smashdirt @ViralManager Then I'm not sure you have a good definition of correct. The modern way to look at physics (I am in hep-th btw) is through the lens of effective field theory. Newtons laws (and N-S by extension) are absolutely correct within their domain of applicability.
English
2
0
2
95
sluj
sluj@smashdirt·
seeing shit like this makes me question reality 100 million particles of water behaving exactly like water. at what point do we just admit the simulation theory might be right
Jeremy White@jeremywhitefx

Hippo fluid scene pushed to 100M particles made with HydroFX. Foam, bubbles, and spray all simmed together in one system for a cohesive result, fully GPU accelerated. Meshed + extra sand interaction in Houdini, final lookdev/render in Blender. Get HydroFX storm-vfx.com

English
273
221
7K
659.4K
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@notadampaul @Pacem_tw @smashdirt @ViralManager And with regards to them 'not having solutions', they do! They are very solvable for all practical purposes through perturbation theory. This is how all calculations are done in physics for anything more complicated than a textbook problem. Do you think QFT is exactly solvable?
English
0
0
1
40
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@notadampaul @Pacem_tw @smashdirt @ViralManager I mean Navier-Stokes is verified experimentally to the exact same degree that Newton's laws are verified experimentally; N-S is literally just N2L in a form that makes sense for a continuous medium. Would you deny that Newtons laws are correct?
English
1
0
3
402
notadampaul
notadampaul@notadampaul·
@Pacem_tw @smashdirt @ViralManager no, that is catastrophically incorrect. At best, you can say "we have equations that water seems to obey sometimes, in the situations where can solve them" You cannot say you know something that hasn't been solved, proven, or verified empirically. Like, that is a literal lie
English
1
0
21
474
Awesome Modern Warfare Facts
Awesome Modern Warfare Facts@awesumzombiefac·
> “Speed Cola” > “Restart Level” > “Speed Cola” > “Restart Level” > “Speed Cola” > “Restart Level” > “Speed Cola” > “Restart Level” > “Speed Cola”
Awesome Modern Warfare Facts tweet media
English
47
261
4.9K
139.7K
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@benkbullock @DiracGhost Not too hard to work through a book when you already know most of the material. Just gives extra little bits of insight into certain things
English
0
0
1
113
Ben Bullock
Ben Bullock@benkbullock·
@DiracGhost Are you just posting them to get likes or do you read them?
English
1
0
0
244
Didier 'Dirac's ghost' Gaulin
Been using Landau and Lifshitz series quite a bit these past few months, and I got to say that volume 3, which is on non relativistic quantum mechanics, is becoming one of my favorite book on quantum mechanics. This one is not an introduction, and is not aimed at beginners, therefore, you might want to check out Griffiths and Shankar before you try your hand at this one. Go check out for a sample, chapter 3 on Schrödinger equation over at the internet archive, you'll thank me later!
Didier 'Dirac's ghost' Gaulin tweet media
English
31
70
790
40.6K
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@bcubeddd All Lagrangians are inherently classical no? In the sense that they lead to field equations for classical fields through EL eqns? The Dirac field obviously only has a physical interpretation once quantised, but the Lagrangian itself is classical
English
1
0
0
68
///////////////////
///////////////////@https_hotpiss·
@tofeelhealed To be honest most of my favorite metal bands actually would have existed without Black Sabbath
English
2
0
0
337
greghall.
greghall.@tofeelhealed·
put the octanecore down dummy it’s time to learn about a band called black sabbath and how without them you wouldn’t have any of those bands you’re willing to camp days in advance for
English
8
101
1.1K
26.6K
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@onehappyfellow @martinmbauer Exactly. The masses depend on the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field at its minima.
English
0
0
4
81
One Happy Fellow
One Happy Fellow@onehappyfellow·
@Jake_M_Wilson @martinmbauer Ag ok, so with Higgs your theory still has the required symmetry and the mass comes from the value the Higgs field happen to settle on?
English
1
0
4
268
Martin Bauer
Martin Bauer@martinmbauer·
13 years ago today, the discovery of the Higgs boson, the central piece of the Standard Model, was announced! What’s something you've always wanted to know about the Higgs boson? Ask away!
Martin Bauer tweet media
English
161
231
1.6K
266.4K
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@onehappyfellow @martinmbauer There's nothing stopping you from just adding a mass term to any lagrangian, but mass terms added in this naive way lead to lagrangians that aren't invariant under the required gauge group. The Higgs lets us keep the invariance, while adding mass in a roundabout way
English
1
0
3
281
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@onehappyfellow @martinmbauer ... to the previously massless gauge field, giving these new fields the necessary components to make them massive, as is observed.
English
1
0
3
348
Jake
Jake@Jake_M_Wilson·
@onehappyfellow @martinmbauer If we try to try to create a langragian that respects this gauge group, we find that the associated gauge fields are all massless. If a scalar (Higgs) field is added to the model, it permits massless boson modes that 'lend' one of their components to the ...
English
1
0
3
362
Rainshadow War College
Rainshadow War College@RshdwWarCollege·
@CraigMak2 @darthtrump2028 @nikicaga Look up the blackbody radiation curve, kid. Photons aren’t interchangeable. They differ in frequency more than mere color temperature can represent. Also, LED bulbs flicker in ways that incandescent filaments simply don’t.
English
2
0
1
512
Бенжамин
Бенжамин@Loko_Broncos·
@J_B__7 @secondtierpod How many times is the British grand Prix held a year? If it was every week, attendances would die down. Collage football attendances could rival them tbf
English
6
0
16
3.8K
Daniel Litt
Daniel Litt@littmath·
oh, didn’t realize you were a math tutor in college. fwiw I think ANDREW WILES has taught some math classes himself
Daniel Litt tweet media
English
55
36
1.2K
136.9K
not_Lok
not_Lok@alt_Lok·
@martinmbauer GPS does not need relativistic anything to be precise.
English
2
0
2
579
Martin Bauer
Martin Bauer@martinmbauer·
If you can find a single experiment that contradicts special relativity your paper wouldn't just get published, you could start looking for hotels in Stockholm SR is accepted because it is confirmed experimentally literally every second every day. In fact, you test its predictions every time you use GPS -without relativistic corrections, it would be off by kilometers
Obs@FranklyUk

@martinmbauer Do you think it is true to state, it would be very difficult to post a paper, anywhere that would been seen or heard within the science community, that questions SR, given that majority of professionals now consider SR as accepted and are now invested in SR?

English
51
40
433
34.9K