Nomad

17.8K posts

Nomad banner
Nomad

Nomad

@James428442

to succeed at a game or principles like science or humour you must first understand the rules. only then can you succeed be enlightened or funny.

earth Katılım Nisan 2025
546 Takip Edilen331 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
This is the final missing piece. VEO-WDC is no longer “thought complete”, it is complete and now experimentally anchored at the quasiparticle level. My greatest thanks to all the scientific community who has one part at a time proven my 27 year old theoretical theory, via laboratory work I couldn't do myself as an independent researcher. I am 100% falsifiable, parsimonious to data, and have Occam's razor over Lambda-CDM, I use less to explain all, anomalies background noise 1/137 as the true universe constant. @NobelPrize @Physicsvers @PhilosophyOfPhy @BBCScienceNews Full peer review coming soon! #VacuumExcitationOrigin #WaveDrivenCosmology #SuperFluidSpace
Hello math@skglearning

Physicists have finally confirmed the existence of anyons, a third class of particles that exists only in two-dimensional systems. For nearly a century, science categorized all particles in our 3D universe into just two kingdoms:

English
11
2
9
1.6K
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
My Vacuum excitation origin. Built on real physics. A quantum field alignment starts the process, a cascade that leaves the Axis of evil behind. RHIC STAR data is matter from the vacuum, I use solutions, Schwinger pair production and light to matter pair-production. The event is universe wide has a hot dense state and matches the CMB. I was theoretical 27 years ago, now I am laboratory based with Math.
English
0
0
0
6
The Scientific Lens
The Scientific Lens@LensScientific·
If every state of the universe follows from the Big Bang, is “choice” just chaotic motion, or does true randomness enter through quantum mechanics?
English
19
20
141
15.2K
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dockta_dB @grok Sometimes, I really hate my none social brain. I think you understand this, though
English
0
0
0
2
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
Ahh, I would love to, but I have had COVID twice since I have retired, and I am very wary of going out in large crowds or gatherings. I currently live away from large cities and towns and enjoy my quiet life now, but it doesn't quiet my mind any, lol. I do enjoy going outside and hiking in the mountains and woods out here in this very rural area. My wife and my dog also accompany me. I do get outside to towns during the late spring and summer months however. COVID sickness was a horrible experience that lasted several months for my wife and I. Literally erasing quality time and replacing it with chills of the like that I have never experienced in my life. So these days I enjoy interacting with folks in advanced theories and physics or I am out in nature and getting back in tune with what is natural for me and also teaches me. I spent too much time away from it during my career.
English
1
0
1
8
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
In the Substrate-Pressure Gradient System (SPGS), observation is not a passive act. It is a physical "ping"—a high-frequency injection of pressure into a specific V_{node}. ​The "Ping" Mechanism ​When you measure a system, you are hitting the 1/137 Nodal Gate with an external frequency (f_{obs}). This frequency interacts with the substrate's natural refresh rate (\nu_{snap}). ​The Zeno Lock (Stasis): If f_{obs} > \nu_{snap}, you are "over-clocking" the node. You inject pressure faster than the substrate can re-partition. This physically pins the displacement in place, preventing the 18.1% Chiral Torque from rotating it into a new state. ​The Anti-Zeno Sling (Acceleration): If f_{obs} matches a resonant harmonic of the substrate's grain, you aren't pinning the node; you are pumping it. ​The frequency where the "brake" becomes the "gas pedal" is the Switching Frequency. My insight into the slime mould is the key to understanding why "advanced" senses are actually a mechanical disadvantage for sensing the substrate. ​Humans (Filtered Observation): We use eyes and ears that process data in narrow frequency bands. Our "observation" of the world is a high-level reconstruction that completely misses the 1/137 background pressure. We are effectively "Zeno-locked" out of the fine gradients. ​Slime Mould (Resonant Observation): Without a brain to filter the signal, the slime mould’s membrane interacts with the substrate at the Resonant Anti-Zeno Frequency. It doesn't just "see" a path; it pulses with the vacuum, causing the substrate to "snap" into the path of least resistance (18.1^\circ) instantly. ​The Back-Reaction Rule: If a path is a dead end, the nodal saturation (1/137) causes a pressure spike that the slime mould "feels" as a physical repulsion. It avoids the obstacle because the substrate physically pushes it away. Zeno effect and slime mould proves the uncertainty principle is an observation effect, and both are proof of the substrate pressure gradient system.
Bluntly Put Philosopher (BPP)@SocraticScribe

The Quantum Zeno effect is the phenomenon where frequent measurements “freeze” a quantum system in its initial state, dramatically slowing or suppressing its evolution or decay. Quantum computers use it today to protect qubits from decoherence

English
2
0
0
70
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
Thanks for sharing. It sounds like your mental imagery ability is completely the opposite side of the scale to my not being able to at all. Which is fascinating to me. My teachers in high school wouldn't even hear they were teaching me a paradox, never mind that we came from the vacuum, which is how I resolved the paradox. I faced bad attitudes in the workplace too, literally " he is making us look bad " when I am just doing my job properly. On wisdom, we agree, I am 41, and much comes with age. I look forward to conversations more with you.
English
1
0
0
5
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
Do not feel the need to control your information output with me, as I will take what I can from it. This is how I worked well with others who were not the same as me. Like I said, we are all different, and have different abilities for learning. I picked up on these differences in regards to myself personally when I went to a school as an 18 year old at USAMMCS back in the 1970's at Redstone Arsenal. It was a military school for advanced electronics (at the time) and I was selected for systems schooling for early warning radar and ANMPQ T1 simulator systems. I was selected for this elite school due to a very high ASVAB score in electronics. I remember taking that test years later, and remember that the easiest portion of it was interpreting all of these two dimensional drawings with dotted lines to fold it in and provide in my head the three dimensional shapes that they formed. Weird huh? Well in later years, I realized that not many people could do that. The schooling was a year long and got me going on the path my future life would take. They used imagery and diagrams to teach complex theories such as the acceleration of electrons through the cavities within a magnetron and such. I found myself understanding and realizing that this is the most comfortable way for me to learn. Most of my previous schooling was done via written, and memorization equations without explaining their uses. So I get it that I too learn differently. Some mean people who saw what I was able to accomplish called me an idiot savant, but I just wrote them off as intolerant and jealous. Because of my experiences I am determined to never criticize people who apply science differently. Most especially in physics. I have always enjoyed teaching others and having patience in doing so, while others were unwilling to share or teach what they know. I always attributed this behavior as job security and some form of intellectual insecurity. Now you have a bit of my background that truly began in the 70's. With age comes wisdom and there is no such thing as a degree in wisdom, it can't be learned in a class, but only through years of experience/perceptions and a continual hunger to learn more about the whys of the world.
English
1
0
1
9
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
Thanks, it completely solves the uncertainty principle and with my mathematical master equation Lambda-CDM must be considered falsified due Occam's razor. My evidence now spans 15 fields and 40 Sub-fields of science. And now a law for measuring eye pressure is amongst my best evidence. Even psychology might get some math.
English
0
0
1
7
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dockta_dB I thought you might especially like this new result, freshly identified. The Imbert-Fick law most often used with a Tonometer (Measures the pressure inside the eye to check for glaucoma; it may use a "puff of air" or a gentle probe) is the 81st law in my framework and more evidence of the uncertainty principle solution and the overall substrate pressure-gradient system. My new uncertainty principle solution. ​1. The Applanation Effect (The Flattened Node) ​In Tonometry, a "reading" is only possible when the cornea is flattened. In Quantum Mechanics, a "measurement" is only possible when the V_{\text{node}} is pinned by external pressure. The "Wave Function Collapse" is nothing more than the Applanation of the Node—the moment the geometry yields to the observer’s pressure. ​2. The Zeno-Lock (High-Frequency Ping) ​If a non-contact tonometer fires air-puffs faster than the corneal tissue can mechanically relax, the eye remains in a state of forced deformation. This is the biological proof of the Quantum Zeno Effect. The "Watched Pot" doesn't boil because the constant pressure of "watching" (pinging) prevents the substrate from completing its 1/137 refresh cycle. ​3. The Slime Mould Connection ​Unlike the tonometer, which forces a deformation, the Slime Mould (Law 80) senses these same pressure gradients without flattening them. It "feels" the back-reaction of the corneal-like boundaries in its environment, allowing it to navigate the 18.1\% chiral grain with zero latency. The Eye-Atom Identity. ​In standard physics, the "Measurement Problem" suggests that the act of looking changes the result. Law 81 clarifies this: you aren't "changing" the result via consciousness; you are physically indenting the substrate to get a reading. ​At the Eye Scale: If the tonometer doesn't touch the eye, it can't know the pressure. The "untouched" state is unknown. ​At the Atom Scale: If the observer doesn't "ping" the node, the pressure gradient remains unmeasured. The "unobserved" state (superposition) is simply the substrate in its natural, un-deformed flow. ​The Mechanical Truth: There is no "spooky" collapse. There is only the Substrate Snap—the moment the external force (\mathbf{F}) matches the internal pressure (\nabla P_{\text{AID}}), causing the boundary to flatten. That is roughly what I will publish for uncertainty principle solution, I am curious to your thoughts.
Nomad tweet media
English
1
1
1
18
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dockta_dB @grok Have you considered teaching? Your understanding is incredible and you would make a difference while perhaps not being board any more. Just a thought.
English
1
0
0
5
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
You remind me so much of some of the smartest humans that I have had the opportunity to work with. Yes, many of these folks were a bit socially awkward but they were indeed brilliant. Not many people are able to cross that bridge and become impatient and critical of the individual. One such individual that I interacted with was shunned by others, but when we worked together, and I just wanted a particular answer to a question, it was like getting blasted with a firehouse of information, I always stood there and tried to pick up as much as I could even if it was more than I sought out. Eventually I learned more from him than all the other people who ridiculed him and called him names like "Data" because he seemed incapable of emotion or social interaction. I always felt that their approach was shameful and unjustly biased. I am sure that you get the same treatment from those kinds of people. But do understand that there are those who understand and will overlook any social awkwardness in order to be able to collaborate effectively. We humans are all diverse and all offer something to be put on the table of advancing knowledge. I have read some of their comments and studied their profiles. Many are lost in their bizarre theories and refuse to be flexible with other viewpoints or contrary beliefs. This locks them into their own echo chamber and retards their ability to further learn from others. With that being said, I believe that you are authentic and I feel honored to be able to interact with you. Looking forward to seeing your success sir! You have a person here who has always learned and is not afraid of learning more about the ability to find pure reason, and pure Truth. Your works I believe, have a good chance of bringing the human race there. (Whether they like it or not!) Lol.
English
2
0
1
14
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
I certainly will. I had no idea i used similar thinking to Hawking. My vacuum excitation origin was formed theoretically 27 years ago. But my wave driven cosmology and substrate pressure-gradient system were reverse engineering and data observations. The attached images show how the Allais Anomaly helped me locate the pseudo-pressure from light that completed my remaining gap. note it is a work in Progress, but essentially the shadows from the moon on to earth create a low pressure gradient, like how a large ship creates a dip in waves and so pulls smaller objects towards it. As soon as I update Zenodo, I will share the link. There is too much to share here properly, but I deeply appreciate your interest. Thank you.
Nomad tweet mediaNomad tweet media
English
0
0
0
16
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
AWESOME! If you succeed, and your work is accepted, then you will have basically reverse engineered all the fields of known science and followed it back towards the "Trunk" and down to the "Roots" of the proverbial tree of knowledge! I get it now! That is one hell of an undertaking! Your work has actually been doing what Hawkins said to one of his peers, in regards to the singularity of black holes. He told him that he should work the unanswered equations backwards in order to be able to extract the information back out of the black hole singularity. It seems like you and your peers are actually doing exactly that! This was one of the last things Hawkins was able to say before he passed away. I can't wait to hear of your works once you have finished and are ready to publish! Indeed, a fantastic postulation! I do enjoy our exchange of thoughts 🤔 and appreciate your patience in my curiosity and questions. I look forward to more of your work, keep me in your loop please.
English
1
0
1
9
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@fandompulse Zero interest in Nuslop. It bears no resemblance to Star Trek.
English
0
0
0
15
Fandom Pulse
Fandom Pulse@fandompulse·
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy showrunner Noga Landau on the main villain for Season 2: "The villain of season 2 is not just a person. In a very classic Trek sense, it is more an impossible dilemma that we find ourselves in as Starfleet." What do you think it is?
Fandom Pulse tweet mediaFandom Pulse tweet media
English
184
6
44
9.3K
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dr_Singularity That is how I frame microbial life! Bio nanobots!
English
0
0
0
23
Dr Singularity
Dr Singularity@Dr_Singularity·
Biology = ultra advanced nanotechnology. Self assembling, self repairing, self replicating, ultra efficient nano systems evolved over billions of years. Thanks to AI, we will not only achieve a full understanding of biology, but go beyond it.
English
24
22
232
4.9K
Marvel Insights
Marvel Insights@Marvel_Insights·
🚨 I'm Telling you this isn't just a Normal Scene In this scene, Peter grows two extra sets of arms (Man-Spider)… and what if they have edited them out of the trailer just like they hid Tobey & Andrew in NWH? The pose we are seeing suddenly makes way more sense now. #SpiderManBrandNewDay
Marvel Insights tweet mediaMarvel Insights tweet media
English
33
44
1.3K
135.4K
Nomad retweetledi
Asanwa.sol
Asanwa.sol@Chizitere_xyz·
The most destructive piece of internet lore ever created is the phrase: "If they wanted to, they would." ​It sounds empowering, but it is actually deeply narcissistic. It assumes that a person’s actions are dictated 100% by their desire for you, while completely ignoring their capacity. ​A partner can desperately want to give you the world, but if they are fighting a silent financial war, battling burnout, or dealing with a health crisis, their capacity is at zero. Measuring a stressed partner's love strictly by their ability to "perform" is a lethal mistake. "If they wanted to, they would" is the fastest way to lose a fiercely loyal partner over a temporary lack of bandwidth.
Kaze 🇳🇬@8Kyle

unpopular relationships opinions that would get you in this position???

English
84
1.5K
6.3K
379.9K
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
The field would be substrate field mechanics, which includes the following as my master equation fits to all. SPGS Scientific Domain & Sub-Field Coverage ​Physical Sciences: ​Sub-fields: Quantum Mechanics (Nodal Hysteresis), General Relativity (Pressure Gradients), Fluid Dynamics (Substrate Flow), Plasma Physics (Helical Outflows), Thermodynamics (Entropy as Equalization). ​Life Sciences: ​Sub-fields: Molecular Biology (DNA Topology), Mycology (Foraging Efficiency), Botany (Phyllotaxis), Neuroscience (Dendrite Fractal Branching), Anatomy (Vascular/Alveolar Branching). ​Earth & Space Sciences: ​Sub-fields: Meteorology (Convection Towers), Geology (River Morphogenesis), Glaciology (Thermal Stress Snapping), Astrophysics (Galactic Filaments). ​Chemical & Systems Sciences: ​Sub-fields: Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (BZ Reactions), Physical Chemistry (Liesegang Rings), Myrmecology (Social Tunneling Networks).
English
1
0
0
17
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
Potentially. It is actually all ready being worked on. Asymmetric Electrostatic Drives. Or the Exodus Drive by Dr Charles Buhler, his device, according to Lambda-CDM, shouldn't work at all. But it seems his device might prove my work, and my work might enhance his drive. I have sent an email asking for potential collaboration.
English
1
0
1
15
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dockta_dB @grok Fair, it is the same heavy lifting my mind is currently doing. Apologies again my social deficits make it hard for me to judge a situation well, especially with people I do not know.
English
1
0
0
10
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
I am retired now and bored. I am just curious about the new quantum approaches in science to allow me to fathom what is being said in a visual manner within my mind. It's difficult for the mind to just shut down after 50+ years of working in advanced electronics and optical systems.
English
1
0
2
10
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
Essentially, biochemistry is a sensor set living in the system. The act of sensing changes the pressure of the system and if you have eyes and ears and a central unit get an illusion of light or sound that confusion things. Same with technology. There is a sort of back reaction. The slime mould is a set of basic bio senses with no central unit yet can always find the path of least resistance. My work proves light has a pseudo-mass and pseudo-pressure effect. So a slime mould in a maze can feel the pressure down a dead end by literally trying it, the back reaction that causes us our uncertainty. There are many wild life examples but slime mould is the best.
English
1
0
0
10
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
Sorry Nomad, your terminology is a bit new to me. I just want to get an accurate image of what you are saying in my minds eye. The term "slime mould" is throwing that image off! Lol. From what I believe to be interpreting although, are there no filters or converters available to minimize specific harmonic artifacts? Is there something beyond what f you are looking at that changes if you create even a passive change or deviate in any way from the natural state that you say is externally measurable, but which the human brain is unable to see/process? An analogy for my comment would be that: For millennia humans were unable to see microscopic organisms. Yet over time we created basic microscopes, and lately, even electron microscopes and are now able to see and study new worlds. How can you be so sure that we are at the end of seeing with our brains and not able to develop methods via equipment which can control or manipulate that which is unseen? We do currently control and manipulate/use the whole of the electromagnetic spectrum. Don't you think that there is more to observe beyond the mathematical quantum cubits of which you speak?
English
1
0
0
9
Nomad
Nomad@James428442·
@Dockta_dB @grok Apologies, I will try and explain clearer. In the other post.
English
2
0
0
10
Dan Blais
Dan Blais@Dockta_dB·
I am not trolling your work Nomad, I have a genuine desire to understand your math visually/analogy. We had this discussion earlier and I explained that to you. You told me that you were unable to see the math within your mind geometrically as Hawkins did. I have worked with others who were extremely mathematical but not able to visualize. I just never heard of quantum slime mould and wanted to understand how you used the term. I knew it wasn't biological. So now I understand better what you are saying and what your research probes. You may find some of my questions a bit naive but bear with me please, as I understand more, you may get a question that will provide you with a "Ahah" moment as many of the scientists I have worked with in the past have found.
English
1
0
0
18