JamesD

@AuraLeeHarvey @SarahLongwell25 @TheRickWilson The main difference appears to be your opinion of the person or who said it. You're suggesting it would be ok to be openly happy Charlie Kirk is dead. The only issue is how he died. You're trying to thread a needle here and failing.

@SarahLongwell25 @TheRickWilson Just so young readers are aware, there are important differences between cheering on political assassinations and just being a huge asshole like Trump. It’s not very cool to try and draw that comparison for social media likes and political points either.

Ah, well. Nevertheless.

@ComradeHayouhi @Cha_Racs @AlHendiify @LaserDiscChris If that happens, some nuclear waste in concrete is the least of our problems.

@Cha_Racs @AlHendiify @LaserDiscChris Most of our data & knowledge now is stored digitally. Wipe that out, add a couple more world wars, and let the climate crisis escalate, and in just a few generations we won't know how to begin to build the machine that builds microchips. 2/2

Now show us 10,000 years worth of safely stored waste and how you communicate to a society 500 years into the future that no longer speaks the same language that this is an incredibly dangerous material.

@AlHendiify Imagine being wrong in response to your post where you're also wrong.

Y’all sittin there acting like dark ages have never happened.

@PierreSavoie6 @jondelarroz @jessiegender The existence of familes is not left or right wing. Thats completely ridiculous. Where are the polycules in literally any Star Trek? And the only religion that shows up in TNG or later is alien religions.

@JamesD0101 @jondelarroz @jessiegender Do you DENY that there were families and religion in Star Trek? What about the chapel aboard the Enterprise? (Not Nurse Chapel!)

Star Trek was always woke. The fact these people complain about “wokeness” in Star Trek kinda proves they missed Gene Roddenberrys whole point with Star Trek.

@PierreSavoie6 @jondelarroz @jessiegender Ok so you're just an idiot then and want to fight the current culture war. You probably wonder why your kids don't call very often.

@JamesD0101 @jondelarroz @jessiegender Star Trek was definitely right-wing. They referred to families, e.g. Spock had a father and mother that you met. Star Trek didn't speak about polycules where 7 people of random gender slept 7 to a bed! And all men's hair was cut short and not tinted with unnatural fluorescents!

@PierreSavoie6 @jondelarroz @jessiegender I don't particularly care what you think about the real Cold War. I'm talking about Star Trek, for which you've correctly identified the allegory, but incorrectly suggested it was right wing.

@JamesD0101 @jondelarroz @jessiegender The Cold War should not have ended. You STARVE out Communism, defund it, so it is gotten rid of SOONER. The U.S. gave up on Vietnam because of its Communist college agents all over. (But in the graphic novel WATCHMEN, the U.S. had actually WON, and Nixon stayed President.)

@PierreSavoie6 @jondelarroz @jessiegender Good work. You've identified the allegory. Now think one step further about the concepts of the episodes. How were those conflicts addressed? My god man the most direct movie, Star Trek 6, discusses the end of the Cold War and is specifically about racism. ST4 is climate change.

@jondelarroz @jessiegender That's right. The Democratic Federation of Good Guys were in a just, cold struggle against the Klingons (Soviets) and the Romulans (Communist Chinese). The Vulcans appeared to have some relation to the Romulans, so that made them Taiwan...

@jondelarroz @jessiegender This is one of the dumbest comments ive ever seen.

@jessiegender No it wasn't. Star Trek used to be based and right wing.

@bbellina @ZachBDB @jessiegender Normal as in they were human, but it was 1966 during the height of the Cold War and you had a Russian, a Japanese person, and a black person on the bridge. That was far from normal.

@ZachBDB @jessiegender They were normal people with normal capabilities. The only exception was Spock.

@SamMonsonNFL Rip off the bandaid!

60%!!!

@rsgore @mattyglesias @CartoonsHateHer It certainly happens, but the numbers are a tiny percentage of women.

@mattyglesias @CartoonsHateHer We actually know the answer to this: look at the number of women who become pen-pals with imprisoned violent criminals.

@Bubblebathgirl @atrupar That doesn't change the problem. You can't move it through the strait.

@atrupar Take over Kharg and get the oil!

C-SPAN: Would you consider the military taking over Kharg island boots on the ground? REP. HARIDOPOLOS: I think people would see that as an occupation of a vital economic interest. As a history teacher, I consider boots on the ground occupying an entire country like we did after WW2 in Japan

@_sn_n They fast tracked to the depression

any update on this

@BoredStas @sungleeiq The private ships, not the governments. I know reading comprehension is hard for a bot.

@sungleeiq Ran out of supplies in 1 week? 🤣 You propaganda is declined.

NOBODY KNOWS HOW FUCKED THE SITUATION IN THE PERSIAN GULF ACTUALLY IS. 3,200 ships are TRAPPED in the Persian Gulf right now. Crews are running out of drinking water. One ship called the local port authority and BEGGED for permission to dock — just to get water. They were DENIED. 💀 Let that sink in. These aren't military ships. These are commercial vessels — carrying oil, grain, electronics — with civilian crews who are now stranded with NO supplies and NO way out. – 3,200 ships STUCK ⚠️ – Crews running out of WATER 💀 – Port authorities REFUSING to let them dock ⚠️ – Multiple ships reporting the SAME situation 💀 ⚠️ For context — the Suez Canal crisis in 2021 blocked 400 ships. This is EIGHT TIMES worse. And nobody is talking about it. They're showing you missile interceptions and oil price charts. They're NOT showing you thousands of crew members slowly running out of drinking water in the middle of a war zone. If these ships start getting abandoned, the environmental disaster alone would be catastrophic. Thousands of tons of fuel, cargo, chemicals — just sitting there. This is not a shipping disruption. This is a HUMANITARIAN CRISIS unfolding in real time. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 X is hiding this. Follow + RT before it disappears. 🔥

@WRETCHEDREDUX @em_Lazzy No, him personally. Though I thought you all hated it when a President's kids got rich using their connections to the White House...

@JamesD0101 @em_Lazzy Maybe his children

Trump told you he’d run America like a business. He is. It’s called asset stripping. You sell the profitable pieces, gut the workforce, load it with debt, and walk away rich while everyone else holds the bag. USPS? For sale. The military? Subcontracted to the Saudis/Israelis. The debt? YOURS!!!

@LisjeB @AkshayJS_TRM @jasongordo626 @zhao_dashuai Or the guy is making shit up. Its that one.

@AkshayJS_TRM @jasongordo626 @zhao_dashuai Bruh those are 2 different things, the footage can be fake while the incident did in fact happen

From the last frames of the F-35 being hit by Iranian air defense. It looks like some shrapnel got into the air intake and damaged the engine, but the airframe looked largely intact. The important thing here is not whether a F-35 was shot down, it was the fact that Iran's air defense was able to detect, track, lock onto and shoot and damage a F-35. This alone is a form of deterrence, forcing the US to continue using expensive standoff munitions with their non-stealth aircraft and avoid using F-35 with impunity.

@jasongordo626 @NRjuni0r @zhao_dashuai so a second ago its a video game, now its a bad chinese missile. You just spout off nonsense left and right dont you? engagement farmers are ruining this app

@NRjuni0r @zhao_dashuai Certainly a missile that did no significant damage and allowed the plane to land safely would have to be Chinese. So I’m not arguing about that. Another massive fail by China.

@DOGE4life24 @Aviation_Intel It is an F-35 shape and the US confirmed a damaged F-35. We don't know if this is from that incident but it's not impossible. Either way it suggests it was able to fly back to base. My point was only that you're saying incorrect things. We don't know enough.

@JamesD0101 @Aviation_Intel That's all you got?

USAF F-35 Makes Emergency Landing After Allegedly Being Hit by Iranian Fire The F-35 was flying a mission over Iran when it was forced to divert. A video claiming to show the engagement points to a key threat we have highlighted repeatedly. twz.com/air/usaf-f-35-…

@ramlaen1 @rboonie1961 @Aviation_Intel So is everything you've said.

@rboonie1961 @Aviation_Intel Notice how the only thing CENTCOM confirmed is that an F-35 made an emergency landing and the rest is you choosing to believe what you want to believe.

@DOGE4life24 @Aviation_Intel It's the right shape.

The video is simulated targeting footage with a generic jet silhouette—not an F-35 (wrong shape, no real damage visible). No verified US F-35 losses to Iran; claims are unconfirmed propaganda. F-35s have instead downed Iranian assets and supported strikes that degraded defenses, matching Trump's recent comments. Ethan’s post misrepresents events.