Not That Jim Cramer

12.1K posts

Not That Jim Cramer

Not That Jim Cramer

@Jamesjcramer

Bitcoiner class of 2021, enjoyer of yelling into the void

Katılım Ağustos 2021
1K Takip Edilen749 Takipçiler
Steve Deace
Steve Deace@SteveDeaceShow·
Do you agree with Tucker we should share globalist power with China, or are you America First?
English
205
33
86
24K
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@NotSure61154 @SteveDeaceShow Being richer per capita while receiving aid, attacking a US ship to drag us into a conflict and blackmailing/bribing our politicians to do Israel’s bidding is indeed unique. Correct. EU is also parasitic.
English
0
0
0
5
Douglas
Douglas@NotSure61154·
@Jamesjcramer @SteveDeaceShow We can agree that foreign aide should be removed for most things, but that hardly makes Israel unique or not an ally. You can make the parasite claim for the EU, for example. By action, Israel is far more our ally than most of those nations.
English
1
0
0
8
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@NotSure61154 @SteveDeaceShow He’s arguing with the people who are against the war, obviously. Israel is not currently an ally. They are a parasite extracting American tax dollars while being richer per capita. When they fund themselves we can discuss whether they are worthy of being an ally or not.
English
2
0
0
20
Douglas
Douglas@NotSure61154·
@Jamesjcramer @SteveDeaceShow Your profile pic kind of gives you away. I think I know who he's arguing with. Why don't you share so that we can confirm what I suspect. There is a group that has basically said American First can not include Israel as an ally, does that describe you?
English
0
0
0
11
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@Jay_Ayche7 @SteveDeaceShow We already share power with China and it would take a World War to end that. And calling a war with Iran America First is blatant retarded Boomerslop. It’s not just a false dichotomy it’s a manipulative disingenuous one
English
1
0
0
18
Greg Bergman
Greg Bergman@Corporate_Greg·
Well that was disappointing… UCLA had all their chances and just couldn’t capitalize when they needed to.. Dailey on the bench for most of the last 10 minutes was weird… Held down the guys they needed to and just couldn’t score… Damn…
English
8
0
44
3.1K
Toad
Toad@LearnToToad·
@realsashastone Yeah it's so awful if we have dissenting voices speaking out against the regime
English
1
0
9
173
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer Agree to disagree. Your perception of my statements/data is that it needs qualification to cater It does not But respect the support + hoops talk
English
1
0
0
53
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
For the record, this was my original take on the shot variance issue Well balanced look at both sides of the coin If folks choose to run with an agenda/narrative, that's fine But this was/is my position on it with objective, data-driven analysis...........
LAbound@LAbound2

Laker defense during the 8-game win streak #12 in Opponent Wide Open 3 Attempts (18.8) Opponents are only shooting 32.7% on Wide Open 3s (Dead Last) So while LAL is doing a good job preventing open 3s, the Lakers are definitely getting a major boost from shot variance

English
6
0
15
2.8K
Vote w/ your dollars
Vote w/ your dollars@SlowZwifter·
@Jamesjcramer @SteveDeaceShow They don’t understand you can actually have one right leaning thing and one left. Or they’re just brainwashed into groupthink and afraid to speak out the issues they disagree with outside their safe box.
English
1
0
0
12
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@LAbound2 No you haven’t. Theres plenty you can do. We both know this isn’t true. I tried to talk hoops, you got defensive. Have a good day man. And go Lakers
English
1
0
0
57
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer Your first two sentence is precisely what I've been conveying during our dialogue. There's a gap b/t my statements/data and the interpretation from some folks Not much I can do about that Ultimately I think what you want is me to say is some version of "The Big 3 is awesome"
English
1
0
0
31
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
Many read it as you implying they are unrelated. That’s just the reality and why I commented. But nobody is disagreeing with your data. We’re disagreeing with your interpretation of that data that you’ve posted alongside. Which you may be right about, but many who disagree arent inherently biased and pushing a narrative. We just think the win streak is a damn good data point that the big three can work.
English
1
0
0
31
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer I've *never* stated that improved effort and/or the offense from the Big 3 does not lead to fatigue. I don't know where that is coming from...... I'm not dodging anything. I simply laid out the objective data Can't help how that is interpreted
English
1
0
0
30
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
Nobody is disagreeing with that. We’re disagreeing with the idea it’s unrelated to the Lakers improved play. It’s not a bias to have, for example, the opinion that the Lakers big 3 playing better together makes defending them more fatiguing as well as the team playing harder as a whole does that and could be causing the increase in misses from three. You keep dodging the part of my point and claiming anybody who disagrees with you is biased(exactly what was frustrating you about your detractors). I’m just trying to talk hoops man. You’re not the only one on Twitter who knows ball. I like your posts, just disagree here
English
1
0
0
32
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer Opponents are missing open 3s during the win streak as well and I've laid out all the objective data surrounding that Whether folks want to accept that is a different story, hence my statement about interpretation and bias
English
1
0
0
25
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
Nobody is arguing shot variance isn’t happening, they’re arguing the Lakers deserve credit for the misses and attributing it to luck is over simplifying. Last year the shot variance was teams missing open threes. The Lakers lost cause the Wolves could take advantage of the lack of physicality inside. I don’t think the defensive stretch last year was fake, it was matchup dependent and the Wolves were an awful matchup.
English
1
0
0
34
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer I don’t think that’s biased (team playing harder). The sentiment that shot variance isn’t playing a large role in results, is biased. In short, there’s a gap b/t process (inputs) and results (outputs) We went through this *exact* thing last season. Turns out it was shot variance
English
1
0
0
40
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@SlowZwifter @SteveDeaceShow Unfortunately, I’m skeptical of it being a lack of understanding. These evangelicals have proven to be third temple dreamers who put bringing about the end times over saving America.
English
1
0
1
27
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@LAbound2 You think believing the team is playing harder now is a biased take? Idk your Denver opinion that you’re referring to. It’s reality that teams are missing more shots, the thing people are disagreeing on is it’s just luck and nothing to do with the Lakers defense/effort
English
1
0
1
44
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer Look if we’re being completely candid, there’s inherent bias to it b/c folks want to see things in the light most favorable to their rooting interests Because I’ve said the exact same thing about Denver (and it was true), and received near universal support It’s just reality
English
2
0
0
55
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@LAbound2 I don’t think it’s unreasonable but “very reasonable” is a stretch IMO. It’s still only one data point and it could be explained by the team playing significantly harder recently and the big three all being healthy for an extended stretch of games for the first time this year.
English
1
0
1
49
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer Again, I can't help how things are interpreted...... Essentially I'm conveying this: "The raw data is a bit noisy (absolutely is because of shot variance), I'm going to hold off on the kool-aid until we have a bigger sample" It is a very reasonable take in my view
English
1
0
0
55
Not That Jim Cramer
Not That Jim Cramer@Jamesjcramer·
@LAbound2 I don’t think there’s a massive difference there, more a semantic and severity difference and I think we can both see how what you said can be genuinely misinterpreted and is not necessarily intentionally misinterpreted to push narratives by everybody who disagreed.
English
1
0
1
54
LAbound
LAbound@LAbound2·
@Jamesjcramer But that's not what I said There's a massive difference between "the trio doesn't work" and "I've avoided drinking too much of the Luka/Reaves/Lebron trio works kool-aid" How folks interpret that (or narratives they push) is a much different story..........
English
1
0
0
72