Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mark
15.8K posts

Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

Your Excellency, allow us to comment on this post in which we are of the view that it has missed a few important chapters of international law:
1. Aggression originates from the U.S. and the Israeli regime use of regional water, air and land territories: Based on Article 3(f) of the UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) (Definition of Aggression, 14 December 1974), “The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State” constitutes aggression. For months, we had warned neighboring countries—particularly those along the Persian Gulf—that any aggression from their soil against Iran would be met with our inherent right to self‑defense. Despite their denials, numerous attacks against Iran have been launched from U.S. bases in these countries, a small example being the downing of three military aircraft in Kuwait.
2. Violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter: The United States and the Israeli regime have violated Article 2(4) , which requires all Members to “refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” Their military aggression against Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is the root cause of the current crisis.
3. Iran’s response is lawful, legitimate self‑defense: Our response has been strictly in exercise of our inherent right to self‑defense, consistent with international law and the principles of proportionality, necessity, and discrimination. Operations have targeted only military bases and assets of the aggressors. After these military installations were struck, enemy military personnel and forces fled into hotels and civilian centers, taking innocent civilians as hostages—a gross violation of the law of armed conflict.
4. The Strait of Hormuz: prior freedom of navigation & current restrictions: Before the U.S.‑Israeli regime military aggression against Iran’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, the Strait of Hormuz was open to all countries. Any current disruption to Persian Gulf security or maritime traffic is a direct consequence of that aggression, and full responsibility lies with the aggressors. As the coastal state, Iran has introduced necessary restrictions to ensure safe passage. Vessels belonging to non‑belligerent countries may conduct innocent passage in coordination with Iran. Clearly, vessels of belligerent parties—especially the U.S. and the terrorist Israeli regime, as well as those serving their interests—cannot use this waterway.
5. Call on all free and independent nations: The Islamic Republic of Iran expects all free and independent nations to stand on the right side of history and condemn the aggressors. We reaffirm our readiness for diplomatic solutions based on mutual respect and international law, but will not hesitate to defend our sovereignty, territorial integrity, and national security.
Thank you Excellency for paying due consideration the the above facts.
Korir Sing'Oei@SingoeiAKorir
Spoke on phone with H.E Abdulla Balalaa, Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs for Energy and Sustainability of the United Arab Emirates this evening. He apprised me on the gravity of the situation in the region, and in particular the repercussions of IRGC’s unjustified attacks of critical infrastructure of GCC countries on not only civilian security, but economic and environmental security of the Globe. I conveyed to him Kenya’s solidarity- in line with President Ruto’s well stated position on this matter- and assured him of our readiness to work with the UAE to respond through diplomatic means to this escalating situation. @ForeignOfficeKE
English
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

Anytime my husband and I fought, I stopped cooking.
I didn’t care if he had eaten or not.
I would just make food for myself and leave him to sort himself out.
He never argued. He would simply order food or fix something for himself.
I’d only resume cooking when I was calm again.
Then one month, we had another fight… and as usual, I didn’t cook. The month ended, and he still sent my allowance…
Plus the full foodstuff money like he always does. He even sent the money he had promised my dad.
I was surprised. I asked him why he would still send food money when I hadn’t been cooking.
He simply said,
“Because it’s my responsibility.”
I felt so ashamed.
That was the last time I ever did that.
Now, even when I’m upset, I still cook for him.
And I’ve noticed something…
Most of our quarrels don’t even last anymore.
Somehow, we always end up talking things out while eating.
Small things like this save marriages.
English
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

Whatever good you do for a woman only lasts 24 hours in her memory.
Women have short-term memory for the good things done for them, but long-term memory for the bad things done to them.
They are naturally ungrateful beings. They hate it when we say this, but it’s the truth.
People who have unlimited expectations, make too many demands, are never satisfied, and constantly make comparisons will always be ungrateful.
“Oh, you want me to thank you for buying me flowers when your friends are buying cars and giving their wives and girlfriends money?” Sounds familiar, right?
This is why the phrase
“bare minimum” and what have you done for me”
Are very common among women. You can fund her entire education, be there for her when she was sick, take care of her family…but if you refuse to celebrate Valentine’s Day for her, she will forget all those things, hold onto that one day, and make you out to be the bad guy.
We have women as sisters, mothers, wives, colleagues, and friends. Many of them display these patterns. This isn’t an attack; it’s the truth. Women are very ungrateful.
STUNNER@Cr7Godbrand
What opinion about women do you have that makes people feel like this?
English
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

Mark retweetledi

There is a man who inherited a plot in kinoo , he sold it for 10million bought some land in gitaru for 3 million built one room and squderd the rest . When he finished the money he sold gitaru moved to limuru and did the same thing .The last we heard of him he had lived in maimahiu then gilgil and is currently in a place called kasuku . If the government doesn't intervene he might become a citizen of congo.
English
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi
Mark retweetledi

















