Jamie

13.9K posts

Jamie banner
Jamie

Jamie

@JamieBergen1

Writer for @MJJForumUSA. #MJInnocent

Katılım Şubat 2013
906 Takip Edilen458 Takipçiler
Jamie retweetledi
𝒮𝒽𝒶𝓎𝓁𝓎𝓃𝓃✨
Michael is so funny cause why did he say, “I never get too close” and then proceed to do exactly what Bill told them not to? 🤣🤣🤣
English
25
317
4.2K
72.8K
lilaa ୨ৎ
lilaa ୨ৎ@sspeeddemon·
IS WHAT A MAN SUPPOSED TO DO.
English
15
336
3.1K
33.4K
Jamie
Jamie@JamieBergen1·
Bringing these back because I swear I've seen every single square in the last week.
Jamie tweet mediaJamie tweet media
English
0
0
1
12
Jamie retweetledi
Shield Supremacy
Shield Supremacy@visionary_uce·
One day, we will talk about how Michael Jackson was stalked and framed by a NAMBLA pedophile named Victor Gutierrez, which directly led to the original 1993 allegation when he crossed paths with a mentally ill father named Evan Chandler who had Hollywood ambitions.
Shield Supremacy tweet mediaShield Supremacy tweet media
𝔪𝔞𝔦𝔞 𝔡𝔢 𝔩𝔦𝔬𝔫𝔠𝔬𝔲𝔯† ⋆˚☾𓃦@scrmjsired

Does anyone believe that Michael Jackson was a victim of extortion?

English
15
171
612
37.5K
Jamie retweetledi
Dr. Andrew Greene
Dr. Andrew Greene@AndrewGreene864·
THREAD: Buckle up! Here’s the lightning‑fast, jaw‑dropping rundown of what the FBI actually found on Michael Jackson during 12 years of investigations (1993–2005). Spoiler: the theme is not what the tabloids sold you. Source: vault.fbi.gov/Michael%20Jack…
English
5
110
458
17.6K
Jamie
Jamie@JamieBergen1·
@WSJ Maureen Orth is a stone cold hack.
English
1
0
4
50
The Wall Street Journal
Michael Jackson’s celebrity is so blinding, his music so compelling, that it cloaks him with an almost impenetrable shield from the truth: He was a stone cold pedophile, writes Maureen Orth. 🔗 on.wsj.com/4d79IeD
The Wall Street Journal tweet media
English
1.5K
126
972
974.5K
Jamie retweetledi
Jamie retweetledi
stay mad
stay mad@badgirlcrown·
I don’t trust people who don’t like Michael Jackson.
English
9
1.1K
6K
46.4K
Jamie retweetledi
Salazar
Salazar@MikeSalazar777·
@business @ReelTalker @opinion And audience should be allowed to tell critics and journalists who have made a career bashing Jackson to fuck off. So fuck off.
English
10
25
180
1.5K
vi ☆ fan
vi ☆ fan@saycamore·
Since the biopic is bringing in new people, it’s important that everyone researches the cases before becoming a Michael Jackson fan. There’s a lot of misinformation out there, so here’s a thread of credible sources to help you understand the facts. #MJInnocent
vi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet media
English
7
967
4.8K
184.7K
Jamie
Jamie@JamieBergen1·
@saycamore There's also this playlist, which uses AI to read the trial transcripts aloud. I think it's good for anyone who finds going through thousands of pages too daunting. youtube.com/playlist?list=…
English
0
1
7
1.9K
Jamie retweetledi
vi ☆ fan
vi ☆ fan@saycamore·
This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the MJ case. Michael settled a CIVIL case, which had no impact on the criminal one. The investigation continued and a trial would have taken place if his accusers had testified or if evidence had been found for the state to indict him. The accusers had the opportunity to BOTH receive money and pursue criminal charges, but chose not to. He settled the civil case because it was scheduled before the criminal one, which violated his Fifth Amendment rights. The Chandlers admitted in their book that they intentionally created this situation to pressure him into settling. Regardless, this is not relevant to the criminal case itself.
vi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet mediavi ☆ fan tweet media
Slonk@Pies_of_Lee

the fact that michael jackson settled the case with jordan chandler for $23 million is possibly the biggest piece of evidence against him. $23 million in 1993 is about $53 million today. you're delusional if you think someone would settle for that much if they were innocent

English
16
327
1.4K
64.3K
Jamie retweetledi
Dr. Andrew Greene
Dr. Andrew Greene@AndrewGreene864·
Imagine making it to the Super Bowl… only to find out the opposing team has your entire playbook. That’s exactly what happened to Michael Jackson in 1994, and it’s the part of the story people never talk about. Let’s clear something up immediately: Jordan Chandler spent months denying anything happened until Evan Chandler, his dad, forced him to make false accusations against Michael. If Michael Jackson had been guilty, he would have paid Evan Chandler in August 1993, when Chandler first demanded money and threatened to go public. Evan was willing to take $1 million, literal pocket change for Michael. Ask any reasonable person: If someone is guilty and wants to avoid an investigation, why wouldn’t they pay the tiny amount being demanded? Michael didn’t pay because he was innocent and believed the truth would protect him. But justice never got the chance. Two District Attorneys refused to close the criminal case even after the photos of Michael’s genitalia did not match the Chandler’s description, a description that was forced on Jordan by Evan. Had the description actually matched Jackson would have been arrested right away. He was never arrested. That alone should have ended everything. Then it got worse. The judge refused to delay the civil case until after the criminal case, a move that effectively stripped Michael of his constitutional right to a fair trial. He was forced into a civil battle while the DA watched from the sidelines, taking notes. And here’s the Super Bowl moment: The judge allowed prosecutors full access to the civil discovery. That’s the equivalent of handing your opponent your entire playbook before the biggest game of your life. At that point, Michael’s back was against the wall. Settling the civil case wasn’t an admission of guilt, it was the only way to keep the DA from using his defense strategy against him. He chose to protect his freedom, instead of his bank account. And here’s the part the naysayers always ignore: The settlement did NOT stop the Chandlers from pursuing a criminal case. They could have still pushed for charges. They didn’t. As Janet Jackson once said (paraphrasing): If someone hurt your child, do you take the money and run, or do you fight for justice? The Chandlers walked away. No criminal trial. No pursuit of justice. Just a civil payout they were never supposed to get in the first place. So no, this wasn’t “hush money.” This was a man trapped in a system that refused to play fair, forced to protect himself when justice failed him.
English
29
372
1.9K
69.5K