Jason
25 posts


@Breaking57 Plenty of idiots abusing the first amendment for the purpose of antagonising everyone around him. Why do we NEVER see the alleged story they claim to be covering. It’s because THEY are the story, period. We don’t want to see it anymore.
English

@Breaking57 I’ve been seeing a lot of these videos, and while I agree with first amendment rights, I also believe that these people are abusing that right. Eventually, law makers will find a way to stop this behaviour, which will erode or shrink those rights, of the abuse of that right.
English

@Breaking57 I’m on the side of the church guy in this instance. They invited him in. They didn’t ask him to stop. The question is relevant. Why choose to film then. If they were girls playing netball in short skirts, I believe most people would have a problem with that. We should why?
English

@hothingsgirlsay Not sure what is going here. He looks like he is “trans”. So if you’re going to accept trans people, then you MUST accept men (trans men) if female spaces. We can’t have it both ways. We either have men and women and their respective safe spaces, OR we must have trans rights.
English

@Ryandally08 She said criminal “inaction”. Now I don’t like this lady or her politics, but I despise media who think they have some right to mount their own high horse and push their own political views. What ever happened to non biased fact based reporting. You should be embarrassed.
English

@Fred_Reads @NatureChapter And let it live until tomorrow, when the snake comes back without any camera man to help?
English

@NatureChapter This is infuriating that someone would stand and record instead of helping that innocent frog 🤬🤬🤬
English

@Azariel91 The lawyer was right. Why do normal people have to suffer rudeness from trans people, when normal people are not actually mistaken. Please remember. It is the trans people who are different and normal people are being kind enough to include them. They must accept mistakes.
English

@TheDutchRuler @ForWhatItsWor12 @LarryJones You need to eat at home. Eating out for you is a luxury you can’t afford.
English

@ForWhatItsWor12 @LarryJones Who cares. They should maken the prices fair and complete. All these added 'hidden' cost for the consumer is also dumb.
English

@TheDutchRuler @LarryJones I agree with everything except one point. Staff DEFINITELY ARE an expense and they need to remember that. The reason to own a business is for the owner’s family. If staff want more than a reasonable and appropriate wage, they can open their own business.
English

@LarryJones I agree with the creator of this post. Business must pay the appropriate amount and customers should just eat at home. That will mean only health businesses will remain open and only customers who can afford to eat out, will enjoy that luxury.
English

@Breaking57 It all well and good to have your 1st amendment rights, however, why must you choose to make a menace of yourself just because you can?
English

@robin16633 @PeriklesGREAT Star post rammer. Same, same. You are right, mate.
English

@PeriklesGREAT This tool is still in use. It's a post hammer. At least that's what we called it. You use it to drive posts in the ground. 😊
English

@RockyAtotheK You continued to talk garbage far too long in this video, so not going to the end
English

@kittenaround_51 He only punished the counter staff.l and made himself look like a fool. Still, he was very satisfied with the outcome.
English

This guy is upset because he owes $5,000 in property taxes. He goes to the bank and gets all one dollar 💵 bills to pay thinking the tax office will feel his annoyance. They are just staff and can’t control how much a person owes, he should take that up with the county auditor. Do you think his actions were petty or justified?
English

@TrumpGirlOnFire Sorry mate. Just because he said that, it doesn’t make it true. Israel seems to be the only group of people that lost land and was able to get some back. No other group of people have achieved that. What make Israel so special in this case
English

@ChaosTV Everyone is against the lawyer lady in these comments, however, I believe she was right. Why should we have to apologise for not being able to identify transgender people. We should we have to accept poor attitudes from the woke crowd because we believe in biological facts?
English



















