JayMan

151.7K posts

JayMan banner
JayMan

JayMan

@JayMan471

An ever-curious observer of the world. Jamaican-American. 🇯🇲 Highly problematic. Retweet absolutely ≠ endorsement.

Katılım Kasım 2011
343 Takip Edilen9.3K Takipçiler
Stella
Stella@ubiquitousnewt·
Lyman Stone is right that motherhood wage penalties have declined, but he mistakes this for proof that the opportunity cost of childbearing has not risen. In reality, the modern cost of motherhood is not measured in lost income but in lost status. In contemporary societies, prestige is earned through autonomy, professional achievement, mobility, and self-optimisation, all of which conflict with the sustained dependency, temporal immobility, and self-limitation that raising children entails. Where parenthood once conferred honour, social embeddedness, and intergenerational continuity, it now signals retreat from the arenas that define material and economic success. Behavioural-genetic sorting compounds this shift: the traits most rewarded in today’s hierarchies such as high openness, ambition, and delayed gratification are precisely those that suppress fertility What economists call “opportunity cost” is therefore better understood as a status cost: the social and psychological penalty of stepping out of the prestige race. Fertility is falling not because people can not afford children per se but because parenthood or, more specifically, motherhood has ceased to be a route to distinction, excellence, and superiority over peers. Thoughts inspired by @JayMan471
More Births@MoreBirths

A good thread. Motherhood penalties haven't increased but decreased over time. Motherhood has always had a high cost. In the past, it there was an expectation that this cost needs to be paid.

English
13
31
230
49.9K
JayMan retweetledi
Stella
Stella@ubiquitousnewt·
Alleged enthusiast of ethno-political dynamics, can not grasp ethnic clans. Interesting. Please read @JayMan471 and @hbdchick for insight into clannishness. unz.com/jman/zigzag-li… hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/cla…
The Golden One@TheGloriousLion

I like to see myself as a fairly astute and sharp young man. I have had a keen interest in history for all of my life. Over the last 15 years or so, I have taken a special interest in ethno-political dynamics. I often entertain (and dismiss) various theories and possibilities. This, however, is hard to grasp. I feel like a mathematician struggling with an equation that should actually be easy understand – but for some reason it is not. Or like someone new to the gym attempting an exercise – you understand the theory but the body simply does not align with the movement as it should. I do not have any difficulties with reading comprehension. I can clearly read and understand that 100 men were involved in preying upon one girl. Even so, I can still not grasp the enormity of the crime. It requires a level of thinking that is so complex yet so simple. I suppose many of you feel the same way. Fortunately for us, our ancestors created myths to help us understand these things. To help us make sense of this. It is known as Good vs Evil. Myth serves as a sharp sword that cuts right to the centre of it all. Like Alexander when he cut through the Gordian Knot. Fortunately, Myth also reveals to us the correct political course of action: Death penalty for everyone who preyed upon the girl, deportations of every community that was complicit. Lastly, out of curiosity, do you feel the same way about having a hard time grasping it all?

English
0
4
11
1.7K
JayMan
JayMan@JayMan471·
@hell_line0 If anyone had the power to make people all over the world collectively decide anything, that person would be God. That’s how powerful the ability to foster coordination is.
English
0
0
5
1.2K
Maryam
Maryam@hell_line0·
Interesting fact: If women all over the world collectively decided to stop having kids, the this world would literally end. That’s how powerful women are...!
English
2.2K
253
2.8K
212.5K
Pay Roll Manager Here
Pay Roll Manager Here@UsingLyft·
I think the whitest trait has to be high openness/curiosity. Liberalism is sort of proof of that and so is the nature of western philosophy. Maybe I’m wrong but are there any other contenders for the whitest trait?
English
34
5
111
7K
JayMan
JayMan@JayMan471·
Happy New Year!
JayMan tweet media
English
0
0
8
1.2K
JayMan
JayMan@JayMan471·
@emmysteuer It drops off at the top. Men realize when the top women are out of their league.
English
2
0
31
8K
Emma Steuer 🧚🤖
Emma Steuer 🧚🤖@emmysteuer·
Men don’t actually approach/dm attractive women as much as you think they do
English
350
24
1.2K
389.7K
Noah Ryan
Noah Ryan@NoahRyanCo·
Think of all the most innovative cultures. What do they all have in common? Cold seasons. You cannot afford to be lazy in a cold, seasonal climate: - You can’t live impulsively. If you don’t stock food or plan winter shelter, you’re dead - You must cooperate, or you’re dead - You must delay gratification, or you’re dead - You must create tools, preserve food and build storage systems, or you’re dead Lazy, shortsighted behavior is punishable by death. Cognitive load increases and forward thinking becomes a selective breeding trait. The closer to the equator you are, the less change there is. Resource abundance and constant climate mean no pressure to innovate, no long-term planning requirements. Warmth means comfort and comfort means complacency (biologically speaking). Seasonal cognition is what led to the invention of calendars, agriculture and scheduling. The environmental force that paved the way for: - Industrial revolutions - Scientific method - Modern infrastructure Innovation thrives where the future is uncertain and immediate gratification is punished. Future orientation is an environmental phenomenon.
Noah Ryan tweet media
English
887
1.4K
10.3K
1.4M