Jay R

74.5K posts

Jay R banner
Jay R

Jay R

@JayRBP

Formerly Bengals Perspective | Host of the WhoDey Talk Podcast | Anything I say shouldn’t be taken as financial advice | Commentary only account |

Columbus, OH Katılım Temmuz 2020
1.4K Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@TJStats Still in disbelief that he left a year early and gave up literally $100M+
English
0
0
2
681
Thomas Nestico
Thomas Nestico@TJStats·
Roki Sasaki allowed 4 ER in 0.0+ Innings today 3 Walks and a HBP. He should not be in the Dodgers starting rotation right now
Thomas Nestico tweet media
English
44
47
917
153K
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@BMeek23 @vancemeek Took a RB in the first 22 years ago. That’s about as relevant as 16 years ago The Eifert one was still awhile ago too (13 years I believe) Both picks in the 20s Different nfl, way different scheme now, idk. Unlikely imo
English
1
0
0
15
Blake
Blake@BMeek23·
@JayRBP @vancemeek Oh I think its far more likely than Love. Not on Downs/Woods level, but much higher than Love. They've taken 2 TEs in the first in the last 16 years at least.
English
2
0
0
32
Blake
Blake@BMeek23·
I think this is a likely way the draft starts and I think its very possible the Bengals pass on Downs.
Blake tweet media
English
5
0
0
628
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@adriaandelange3 I mean idk how it would be helping hunter Could’ve been pointed at Greene or Lodolo (or neither and he’s just propping himself up as the Ironman he is)
English
0
0
3
304
Adriaan de Lange
Adriaan de Lange@adriaandelange3·
@JayRBP Do you think its at HG or to help HGs narrative of what he told the press?
English
1
0
0
261
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@BMeek23 @vancemeek I’d be pretty shocked if they went Sadiq tbh. About as likely as love imo
English
1
0
0
15
Blake
Blake@BMeek23·
@JayRBP @vancemeek I think its either Woods or Downs, with an outside shot at Sadiq because they do like their TEs too
English
1
0
0
22
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@BMeek23 @vancemeek Yeah no chance they take an OL. 0% imo 0.0001% they’d go RB. Possible but I doubt it I wouldn’t put Faulk past them because of their “type” but would be an incredibly weird and redundant fit. 10% chance in this scenario imo
English
1
0
0
25
Blake
Blake@BMeek23·
@vancemeek @JayRBP They arent taking a guard at 10. I dont think Faulk is even in their mind right now.
English
2
0
0
32
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@whodeyu Yes, clearly I am the one bothered😂
English
0
0
0
17
UNO1️⃣of1️⃣
@JayRBP You don’t even follow me but I’ve bothered you enough to keep commenting. Thanks for being a fan😉
English
1
0
0
31
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@whodeyu You missed the joke lol Crashing out over something you didn’t understand😂
English
0
0
2
105
UNO1️⃣of1️⃣
@JayRBP You’re a grown man worried about numbers on a post 😂😭 is that what you worry about? Sad. Touch grass.
English
1
0
0
223
UNO1️⃣of1️⃣
Delane over Dax Hill. Idc what you all say, Dax is way more overrated than you all think. Turner deserves his extension, but Dax can be replaced.
Kelsey Conway@KelseyLConway

The #Bengals have let DJ Turner and Dax Hill know the team would like to give them contract extensions Turner and Hill are in the plans for the future, but it doesn't mean the Bengals won't be in the market for one early in the draft, here's why: cincinnati.com/story/sports/n…

English
25
1
27
6.7K
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@Nati_Sports If it were up to me I’d flip Myers and TJ Knowing Tito won’t take TJ out of the leadoff spot, flip Dane and Steve
English
0
0
4
797
Nati Sports
Nati Sports@Nati_Sports·
Nati Sports' Opening Day Lineup vs Garrett Crochet: 1) TJ Friedl - CF 2) Matt McLain - 2B 3) Elly De La Cruz - SS 4) Sal Stewart - 1B 5) Eugenio Suarez - DH 6) Spencer Steer - LF 7) Tyler Stephenson - C 8) Dane Myers - RF 9) Ke'Bryan Hayes - 3B Noelvi is a tough sit, but I don't like his production against LHP career wise. Has a lot to prove. Dane Myers was added to this team to hit LHP. What would you change?
English
46
4
344
39.4K
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@jasontostevin @bryce_spalding Eh agree to disagree I guess If it was intentionally not focusing on things, sure, but this isn’t a Jermaine Burton situation lol
English
0
0
0
60
Jason Tostevin
Jason Tostevin@jasontostevin·
@JayRBP @bryce_spalding I don’t know, man. I think not focusing on the things that matter is the definition of slipshod work ethic ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
English
1
0
0
14
Bryce Spalding
Bryce Spalding@bryce_spalding·
I think I’ve been pretty open about my concerns about Marte as a player… He REALLY can’t afford to have the work ethic concerns start rearing again, because this staff won’t tolerate that, at all. Interesting read. Don’t know why we need to be nudging a guy like Marte.
Charlie Goldsmith@CharlieG__

In early March, with Noelvi Marte having a substandard first half of camp, he had a meeting with the coaches. Terry Francona said, "We gave him a little nudge." Marte received the message and finished camp strong. charlieschalkboard.substack.com/p/noelvi-marte…

English
11
0
57
13K
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@DarianShoemaker They’d go traditional 100% Probably would bring up Mey or Maxwell since they are already on the 40
English
0
0
2
189
Darian Shoemaker
Darian Shoemaker@DarianShoemaker·
@JayRBP I hope so. If Lodolo ends up on the IL I wonder if we call up Danner/Antone and go with a traditional structure or if Petty gets that call and we stick with the piggybacking.
English
1
0
0
258
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
So in terms of leverage, are we assuming to start the year Closer: Pagan RH Setup: Tony LH Setup: Burke 7th inning: Johnson/Phillips Fireman: Phillips/Johnson MRP: Ashcraft LH Specialist/Low Leverage: Moll ???
English
3
0
34
3.4K
Jay R
Jay R@JayRBP·
@BMeek23 @Young_Yolaaaa @codiki 2 parts 1. ADG was never targeted to start 2. They see 3 LB starters now, so even if Carter and knight are both seen as the future, they see a hole for LB3, which they see as a starter
English
1
0
0
21
Codiki
Codiki@codiki·
I know the #Bengals will be hell bent on getting a LB early, but…. I’d say the better draft outcome would be a LB on day three and bringing in a vet AFTER the draft like Bobby Wagner to bring the three young pups along. Then you stay cheap cheap cheap at a position of low surplus value
English
12
1
54
6.3K