Jckub

309 posts

Jckub banner
Jckub

Jckub

@Jckub17

Ex Martial Arts competitor | x1🥈🇬🇧 | x1 🥉🇪🇺 | 22 | Politically combative | Philippians 4:13

Katılım Kasım 2025
23 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
English 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
London is now less than 20% English! If you can prove me wrong I would love to hear from you! Otherwise shut the fudge up!
English
17
7
103
4.7K
John Stallings
John Stallings@WhereHasThisCol·
@BigPopz72 Not cool. He was in no danger. Not supporting her but that was for leadership to decide. Knocking someone out is brain damage. That is way too much force for when you are in no danger at all.
English
242
0
36
16.4K
Big Popz
Big Popz@BigPopz72·
A black girl attacks a white kid in a classroom and it gets out of control pretty fast... She's swinging out, he's got her partially restrained, defending himself from the punches until he's had enough. In the heat of the moment, he slams her head on a desk Did he go too far?
English
3.6K
717
8.5K
450.9K
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
Strange watching people celebrate censorship, centralisation, and endless regulation as if surrendering national sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats is some grand achievement. Europe was built on distinct cultures and nations, not a technocratic superstate policing speech and forcing ideological conformity.
English
1
0
1
37
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
But also, Poland was invaded, partitioned and devastated, yet Polish pilots still crossed Europe to help defend Britain in 1940 while London was burning. Thousands of Poles fought alongside the UK despite their own nation already being destroyed. History is a bit more complex than pretending Britain alone carried the burden.
English
0
0
1
25
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
Britain absolutely acted in its own strategic interests, as every nation does. But pretending Poland was irrelevant to the declaration of war is revisionism. Germany invaded Poland, Britain had guaranteed Polish sovereignty, and that triggered the declaration. Both things can be true at once: moral justification and geopolitical self-interest.
English
1
0
0
54
James
James@jhallwood·
We literally went to war and lost our global hegemony and empire in 1939 in defence of Poland. Maybe he wants to reread his history. The Czechs have far more ground to be frustrated at Britain and France in the 30s.
Jakub Krupa@JakubKrupa

Poland & the UK will sign a defence & security treaty in London tomorrow, Tusk confirms He notes ‘history teaches us caution and scepticism when it comes to the effectiveness of treaties’ - a swipe at 1939 - but says it’s a ‘historic’ deal on security, defence, health, cyber

English
17
10
159
17.3K
Chris Dean
Chris Dean@chrisdean129·
Alton Towers today
English
562
664
5.3K
2.5M
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
@eurofounder People can live in Sweden without importing every cultural practice from their homeland. A country has every right to set laws based on what it believes is socially healthy. If someone fundamentally disagrees with those laws, nobody is forcing them to stay there.
English
1
0
1
228
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
@MrHreviews @RmSalih There is also no meritocracy in importing masses of jeets willing to undercut wages and work for less. Calling that a “marketplace of ideas” is nonsense when the market is distorted by endless cheap labour.
English
0
0
2
27
Nate, or, Mr H Reviews
Nate, or, Mr H Reviews@MrHreviews·
@RmSalih Comical. Marketplace of ideas? Is that why Muslims try and shut down any criticism of Islam by shouting Islamophobia?
English
3
6
220
1.2K
Roshan M Salih
Roshan M Salih@RmSalih·
If Islam spreads throughout the UK by a natural process of birth rates and conversion, what's wrong with that? We live in a country where a marketplace of ideas exists. So if the best idea wins how could anyone object? This is allegedly a meritocratic nation where the cream rises to the top. If the people choose Islam that would be a profoundly democratic choice.
English
685
34
235
30.4K
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
The UK averages ~13–14°C annual daytime highs and workplace heatstroke cases are statistically rare. Every system involves risk trade-offs. Lower motorway speeds would reduce deaths too, yet society balances safety against practicality rather than pursuing absolute risk elimination.
English
3
0
1
516
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 NEW: Zack Polanski has called on the Government to introduce a maximum temperature cap in the workplace
English
598
502
13K
1.1M
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
@WhereMeTrophy @justalexoki Failing to mention how greatly the EU is also antagonising the conflict is pure ignorance. Europe thrived for centuries before the EU existed, so pretending Europe cannot survive without it is historically absurd. The EU is a blip in European history.
English
2
0
0
9
TrophylessCockerel
TrophylessCockerel@WhereMeTrophy·
@Jckub17 @justalexoki Europe-wide nationalism will be the death of Europe with the US and Russia pushing for military action. No European country can survive on its own.
English
1
0
0
22
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
And yet the EU itself increasingly creates its own “Us vs Them” dynamic through ideology, political conformity, centralized authority, and hostility toward dissenting member states or populations. You are treating nationalism as uniquely dangerous while assuming supranational identity somehow transcends the exact same human psychology. It does not. It simply scales it under a different banner.
English
1
0
0
6
Kai Schreiber
Kai Schreiber@KaiSchreiben·
@Jckub17 @Obsto123 @justalexoki You cannot return power to the classic nation-state model without inevitably re-activating the exact same psychological tribalism that tore Europe apart.
English
1
0
0
9
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
Then your argument is about cooperation and trade, not specifically the EU itself. European nations can collaborate economically and strategically without steadily centralizing political authority into a supranational structure. And Brexit “proving” sovereignty cannot work is debatable given the UK still faces many of the same global pressures every Western does so it is not unique to Brexit.
English
1
0
0
17
ron arnhard
ron arnhard@ron_arnhard·
@Jckub17 @justalexoki My points is merely that things evolve and Europe has clearly become more prosperous and save by unifying. It’s not perfect by far but thinking one small country can do something against the big guys ( US, China .. ) is a past station. Brexit has proven that
English
1
0
0
25
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
Nuclear is expensive upfront, not necessarily expensive long term. The entire point is ROI and energy security. Once infrastructure is built, you gain stable domestic baseload energy for decades instead of remaining dependent on volatile external markets and imports. Cheap, reliable energy historically correlates with industrial growth and stronger economies.
English
1
0
0
13
Jckub
Jckub@Jckub17·
The irony is you argue Europe is only relevant if national sovereignty is diluted into a larger centralized structure, while claiming that structure protects sovereignty. Europe can cooperate strategically without becoming an increasingly centralized political bloc. Trade alliances and diplomatic coordination existed long before the EU. Calling it a “fact” does not make it one. Europe today is heavily dependent on the US militarily, on external energy, internally divided on migration and economics, and struggling with stagnation despite decades of deeper integration.
English
0
0
7
234
EuroMaximalist 🇪🇺
EuroMaximalist 🇪🇺@euromaximal·
The idea that individual European countries can matter in the modern world without the EU is ridiculous. The EU is the only thing saving European countries from irrelevance and vassalage to Russia, China or the US. This is a fact. The EU needs reform. Not to disappear.
EuroMaximalist 🇪🇺 tweet media
English
6
49
275
7K