F U

@fandompulse Probably not

Be honest: are you going to see The Mandalorian & Grogu in theaters?

@jharrison9292 Super friggin’ rare

Can somebody tell me what is this Hantavirus? Like how do you get it, how is it passed along, is there a cure for it like what is really going on?! I can’t take another Covid pandemic.

@TheCinesthetic Fandango

What's a movie that you swear no one else has watched but yourself and a few others?

@TheCinesthetic American Beauty

What is a movie no one will ever convince you is good?

@HuskGuys Any ideas on the dollar value of turf from Memorial Stadium circa 1992?

Memorial Stadium Urinal Troughs for sale. the perfect sentimental gift for your loved ones. Things have seen generations and generations of urine, a tradition unlike any other.

@LisaMarieBoothe @DavidWohl @KIR_bigg50 Well you can’t say he didn’t earn it.

@DavidWohl @KIR_bigg50 It is when it's two months before a primary when they are trying to clear the field. Two things can be true at once. It can be true, but it can also be a hit job.

The coordinated hit job on this guy is extremely impressive. Brutal.

@marboclepto @UncleBoje He hadn’t interacted with a living thing for years. I think it’s difficult to analyze his reaction to an alien creature given his circumstances. I think it showed his desperation for the situation he faced.

@UncleBoje Boring. I give it a 5. The reason for the 5 is the reality of the acting: when you first see an alien, you're not supposed to act like it's a walk in the park, as Ryan reacted. He wasn't scared at all. Being an A-list actor, you should know that reactions need to be real.

🎬 Do we Think that Project Hail mary is a 10/10?

@TimRunsHisMouth Yep… you’re confused for sure

I’m just confused as to why we’re polling Trump’s popularity against a political pundit. Can someone explain this to me?

@MattWalshBlog Things aren’t where they need to be, but if you’re not seeing and understanding that things are getting measurably better in all the categories you mentioned then you’re not paying attention

Americans are suffering. It is way too expensive just to live for most families. Our cities aren’t safe. Our country is being transformed every day by foreign migration. Our elections aren’t secure. The SAVE act was not passed and won’t be passed. It’s time to end this war in Iran and focus on our country, our people, our future. Far too much of Trump’s second term has been spent on foreign adventures. It has to end. Turn the attention back home.

@Savsays @mexillentJunior She’s more American than all of you libtards

@mexillentJunior A good question..

Texans have been saying that their state is starting to look unrecognizable, so I went to North Texas to go check it out. From streets named, “Ali Akbar”, to residents stating that Texas is now “mini-India”, North Texas is seeing a major shift:

@ConceptualJames I don’t disagree with what you’re saying. However, don’t you basically use these tactics as it applies to religion and your application of “New Atheism”?

Earlier today, I explained that what we see from Tucker Carlson, et al., is ultimately Critical America Theory, which many people found clarifying. To add some depth, I want to explain that at the heart of every critical theory is a lunatic totalist conspiracy mentality. We can start where we started earlier, with Max Horkheimer's characterization of his Critical Theory. He invented Critical Theory in 1937, adapting it from the Marxist tradition of ruthless critique. He described it this way (paraphrasing): "We [neo-Marxists] developed the Critical Theory when we realized that it is not possible to describe the good or the ideal society on the terms of the existing society, but we can criticize those elements of the existing society that we wish to change." This characterization is very important because it reveals the ultimate character of all critical theories: looking for "problematics" in society that don't live up to some imagined ideal society that likely cannot even exist but can still be used as a reference point against which to complain about reality, often senselessly. Briefly, how? How can you use something that isn't real as a reference point? By believing things like "we don't know what an ideal America would look like, but it wouldn't have racism." Then you send people out looking for anything they can consider racist and get them to "problematize" it because the ideal society wouldn't have that happening. That's how. The thing is, Horkheimer's characterization also reveals the true structure of all critical theories: they're conspiracy theories. The belief in the Critical Theory is that the whole of society in every regard is so captured by the ruling classes and powerful interests that you don't even have the tools you'd need to describe an alternative. That is, powerful interests control everything, and they do so in a way where people don't realize it. In fact, they don't even have the conceptual tools to imagine an alternative. And the ruling classes benefit from that situation, so they like it that way, and they keep it that way, sometimes on purpose. The two sides of this mentality are "critical consciousness" for the people who are "Woke" to the Critical Theory and "false consciousness" for the people who aren't. The conspiracy the powerful interests in society run is alleged to be so complete that people literally misunderstand their reality. Give that a second to sink in. That's the totalist part of the lunatic conspiracy theory. The belief that Critical Theory is based on is that the powerful are so in control of society that: (1) nobody at all has the conceptual tools to imagine or articulate an alternative vision; (2) nobody BUT THEM even know this is happening. That's really important because what it means is that everyone is a dupe except the Critical Theorists. That means nobody is actually capable of understanding, much less managing, their own lives and circumstances except the Critical Theorists. Depending on the critical theory in question, different powerful interests allegedly control society (again, to such a degree that nobody except the critical theorists themselves even know it, and such that nobody can articulate an alternative). (Critical) radical feminists, for example, believe that society is totally structured by a male-dominated force called "patriarchy" that benefits men. It is enforced, they say, by another force they call "misogyny," which means hating women. Critical Race Theorists believe society is totally structured by a white-dominated force called "white supremacy" that benefits white people. It is enforced, they say, by another force they call "systemic racism," which they alone can detect (in literally everything). (Critical) Queer Theorists believe society is totally controlled and structured around people who deem themselves "normal" to the exclusion of everyone "queer." This is enforced by a wide variety of structural forces called "normativities," such as "heteronormativity," the completely made-up "cisnormativity," and "thinnormativity," which ultimately hold that there are norms and that's at least sometimes good. Critical America Theory, which I discussed earlier, has two main modes, which we could call "Left" and "Right." The "Left" mode believes that America is controlled by a conglomerate of powered interests including capitalists, nationalists (whom they call "Fascists"), and all of the "privileged" groups in the whole Intersectional pantheon of victimized identities (called "minoritized groups"). The "Right" mode believes that American is controlled by a conglomerate of powered interests including the Leftists and their Intersectional victimhood paradigm and its beneficiaries, globalists (the "managerial elite"), Jews, and, well, capitalists. Both of these modes hold out that the powerful interests completely control the social, economic, and political lives of Americans, and that Americans simply don't know it because it's not possible to talk about it because, allegedly, the powerful interests will shut you down or ruin/"cancel" you if you do. Even though they all do all the time pretty much exclusively while screaming that they can't. These two models are more or less completely diametrically opposed on all issues except Jews and capitalism. The "Left" mode is pro-Intersectional while the "Right" mode is reverse-Intersectional (same model, but privilege is good now). The "Left" mode is pro-globalist while the "Right" mode is nativist-nationalist. Both modes believe capitalism enables the whole problem and that Jews are participants in the problem (though in different ways). "Left" Critical America Theory believes capitalism restrains people in the name of making money (puts money over people) and that Jews are part of the oppressor category that allegedly harms poor Intersectional victims, including the imaginary people known as "Palestinians." Most of this blame is displaced onto Israel, not Jews directly, which is blamed for "genocide" and such, narratives that can be traced at least in part to Soviet propaganda efforts and Islamist agendas. "Right" Critical America Theory believes capitalism is too licentious in the name of making money (puts money over people) and that Jews form a shadowy cabal of powerful and all-controlling hidden interests (that advance their own "Jewish" (national) interests over those of their "host" nations). Most of this blame is displaced onto Israel, not Jews directly, which is blamed for "genocide" and such, narratives that can be traced at least in part to Soviet propaganda efforts and Islamist agendas (with plenty of Nazism mixed in). The point is that these are totalizing conspiracy theories, so in addition to everything that obviously implies, it also means that they cannot be refuted. Any attempt to refute them is merely to reassert the theory of capture and to defend the system of power that prevents people from knowing the "truth" (believing the critical theory). For instance, refuting a feminist is just another way of asserting patriarchal control and attacking women. Refuting a Critical Race Theorist is having White Fragility which is a kind of covert racism they uncovered in you. Refuting a Queer Theorist is forcing norms upon them that cause them harm and make them s-word-icidal. Refuting a "Left" Critical America Theorist is having sold out to capitalist interests or defending one's own privileged status in the system (or "supporting genocide"). Refuting a "Right" Critical America Theorist is believing making money is more important than people, being a shill, or having been bought off, captured, or blackmailed by Jews, Israel, the Jewish lobby, or the allegedly powerful interests that are controlled by these (or "supporting genocide"). I'm sure you're familiar with all this crap, but you might not have known that it's a direct consequence of the structure of the Critical Theory itself. Once Horkheimer laid out that the raison d'etre for the Critical Theory in the first place is that the "very terms of the existing society" are captured by powerful interests and ruling classes, that means that all refutation of the Critical Theory itself is just further proof that the Critical Theory is right that the whole system of sense-making permitted by the ruling classes is captured. Guys, this is idiocy. It isn't just idiocy, though; it's also evil idiocy. Very evil idiocy. Destructive idiocy. It's also easily replicable by people who are just playing in the incentive structure of the cynical logic of the Critical Theory mindset, so while some of the participants pushing us in this direction know exactly what they're doing, most either don't or, at the very least, don't have to. What should you do? Learn to recognize it. Mark it. And avoid it. And help others to do the same.

@JonStewartIL And what evidence can you provide for any of your stupid claims?

I believe we went to the moon. But like many government operations, they also filmed staged footage in a studio — or outdoors — for propaganda purposes. The goal was to deliver those iconic, jaw-dropping shots to the world… just in case any aliens or UFOs were present on the lunar surface during our visit. I’d say more… but I can’t quite make out the rest of the note that was left on my door. (Kidding) That said, it was a spirited debate. One that unfortunately revealed how deeply vulgar, ruthless, and narcissistic some people can be — culturally insensitive and truly unpleasant. But that’s a discussion for another day. If anyone feels the need, feel free to DM me. I can quietly suggest a qualified mental health professional in your area for some follow-up support. Thank you and may God bless each and every one of you and your families. Jon Stewart Former Candidate — Office of IL Governor #NASA #MoonLanding

@redpillb0t Yes, original master videotapes and film for the Apollo 12 mission (1969) were preserved and are stored at the NASA Johnson Space Center. Unlike the lost Apollo 11 telemetry tapes, the Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 master tapes were maintained for archival purposes.

If they went to the moon and spent 250 billion dollars why would they destroy it?

@matthewcoppola @ConceptualJames Nope… you’re stupid. Of course you can criticize, question whatever. That’s not the point. The point is how you do it. And I don’t believe their criticism is intended to improve America. I don’t think even they believe what they’re doing will improve America.

@ConceptualJames So people who want to improve their country are “Critical America Theorists.” Your position is that the status quo is good enough, and that any attempt toward any improvement would be worse? Basically, your argument is “anyone who criticizes America is woke.” Are you stupid?

What you see almost endlessly from Tucker Carlson, "Comic" Dave Smith, Theo Von, etc., and the rest of the blackpillers amounts to a Critical America Theory. I'm not making this up. I'm explaining. Critical Theory was developed by neo-Marxist Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School in 1937. In an interview in 1969, Horkheimer explained what the Critical Theory is. He said (closely paraphrasing): "I developed the Critical Theory because we [Western neo-Marxists] realized we cannot articulate the good or ideal society on the terms of the existing society. What we can do is criticize those aspects of the existing society that we wish to change." In other words, a Critical Theory believes everything is so captured and corrupted by power and those who benefit from systems of power that it isn't even possible to talk about a better situation in clear terms. All that's available is criticism of why the system/society isn't better than it is. This activity has come to be known as identifying or "making visible" the various "problematics" in the existing system. A Critical Theory OF SOMETHING would focus this general mode of engagement into a particular domain. For example, a Critical Theory of Race in America would believe that racism is so endemic to a society and embedded within its systems to the benefit of whites that we cannot articulate a true "antiracist" vision on the terms available to us. All we could do is identify where "racism" manifests and criticize it for being there. We call that program "Critical Race Theory" because it is a Critical Theory of Race. What it does in practice is (1) identifies "hidden racism" in everything (criticizing those elements of the existing (racial) system they wish to change), called "identifying problematics"; (2) induces more people to think this way; nothing else. What a Critical America Theory would look like is not being able to articulate what a good or ideal America would look like on the terms of the existing America but criticizing those elements of America as it exists that we wish to change. That is, it would look for everything America isn't doing perfectly according to some ideal standard that doesn't exist, probably cannot exist, and cannot even be articulated and "make those problematics visible" in the hopes of changing the system. Leftists, including the whole of Critical Race Theory, do this endlessly. From Derrick Bell's (founder of CRT) 1970 book, Race, Racism, and American Law, forward, it is a relentless racial Critical America Theory. That's why it exported poorly and often hilariously to other countries that don't have the same law or racial history. Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States (1980) is another example, a very naked example, of a work of Critical America Theory. Specifically, this book goes through every chapter of American history, from pre-founding (Christopher Columbus) to the present (1980 at the time) and catalogues how America cheated "the people," mainly workers, indigenous, racial minorities, and women (the intersectional coalition). What I'm telling you is that the blackpillers of Podcastistan and X, etc., very notably including Tucker Carlson, are doing a socially conservative variation on Critical America Theory. Whether Carlson or "Auron MacIntyre" (nhrn) from The Blaze, the undertone of every message is plainly "you don't hate your (real) country enough" as compared against an imaginary ideal that doesn't, can't, and won't ever exist. The Blackpill Comics all do the same thing, relentlessly identifying "problematics" and alleged hidden systems of control that delegitimize the country as it actually is against a standard that isn't even real. The thing is, Critical America Theory is a Critical Theory of America. That is, it is a Critical Theory. That is, when you participate in this slop, you are taking on a critical consciousness about America. Having a critical consciousness is being WOKE, by definition (of Woke). This slop is Woke. When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially Leftist slant, we call it Woke Left (or just Woke). When this Critical America Theory slop takes on a socially conservative or Rightist slant, we call it Woke Right (which is just Woke too). They are both Woke. They are both toxic. They are both false enlightenment into a kind of terrible darkness, entitlement, malice, despair, hatred, and failure. Reject Critical America Theory. Love your country. It's great, and it's worth it.

@SmilingKylan @captive_dreamer Ya we’re so much smarter now… go look at Boston today and see for yourself how Boston looks with all the benefits of your so-called “smarts”

It's wild how you can post a video from 60 years ago in Boston and it immediately looks like "White supremacist" propaganda

@AntonioSabatoJr Don’t be a moron and destroy your credibility

"This thing landed on the moon with a rover and all bunch of stuff made it back and now 53 years later with the most advanced technology to date we are only circling the moon. And folks shouldn’t be asking questions and just believe all. The matrix is definitely real."

@AirForceDad50 @AntonioSabatoJr These dumb fucks still won’t believe it. They are perpetually insulated from facts, knowledge and reason.

@AntonioSabatoJr When we do land on the moon( whenever that happens ) this bullshit will go away. Hell land on the same location as the first. Make it live, show the flag and vehicles left behind. And it should be Elons company to do it. Not NASA.

You believe we landed on the moon? 🌖

@TheoVon Why anyone would interview this moron and why anyone would listen is beyond explanation. The guy is practically retarded.

I meant the elites and politicians that are leading us into these wars might make different choices if it was their children. It was hard for me to be angry and talk at the same time. I am thankful for to our troops who serve and are far braver than me. And also wtf do i know.

@ComicDaveSmith Brilliant… just so darn thoughtful

If Trump appointed a good AG, they would arrest everyone in this administration.

@Real_DCJ @konstructivizm They are on the darkside

@konstructivizm Why does the chinese rover look so much different?

These stunning images were captured by Charlie Duke aboard the Apollo 16 rover using a 16mm film DAC camera. They capture John Young's drive from Station 11 to Station 13.