JenX77X
1.6K posts

JenX77X
@JenX77X
Conservative. Patriot. Wife. Mother. ♥️🇺🇸




You’re pretending “implication” doesn’t matter. It absolutely does. She repeatedly implied that Gary/@paramounttactcl was part of a behind-the-scenes TPUSA/Erika Kirk/Andrew Colvette operation. The implications were clear: Candace implied Gary was taking direction from TPUSA. Candace implied Paramount Tactical was being used as a PR weapon against her. Candace implied Gary was involved in a coordinated pressure campaign to stop or control her interview with Mitch Snow. Candace implied Gary was connected to threats or intimidation behind the scenes. A normal person hearing that would not walk away thinking, “Oh, she just means he had an opinion.” They would reasonably believe Gary was secretly working with TPUSA or Erika Kirk to target Candace. That is exactly how defamation by implication works. You do not have to say the exact words “Gary is paid by TPUSA” for the meaning to be defamatory. If you arrange facts, insinuations, and accusations in a way that causes the audience to believe something false and damaging, that can still be defamatory. So no, I didn’t lie about the implications. I understood them exactly the way Candace intended her audience to understand them.


The Candy Cults newest weird creepy obsession is over that of Charlie and Erika’s sexual status when they married. We in fact don’t know if Charlie was a virgin nor do we know if Erika was when they got married. Both could have been. Neither of them could have been. That’s for them to know privately with each other. Once again it’s literally none of your business! And it matters for absolutely nothing! Stop being sick creeps!


Bombshell secret video of Charlie Kirk naming his true Turning Point successor days before assassination trib.al/L3uvxtz


















