JeromePP

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that yields began to push toward a key upward bound today, on the last day of Powell being in office. I think the market is sending a clear message that it will test Warsh’s hand right out of the gates to see if he will be aggressive in ACTUALLY lowering rates.

Stream is here: youtube.com/live/Iuy1OO4Qv…

$AMD - A range has developed here at the highs. FWIW, the cumulative volume on 2,3,7 and 8 [chart 3] is about on par with #1. Plenty of other large trades too (not pictured).

$IGV has left the range that began back in February. $MSFT, $PLTR, $ORCL, $PANW

For someone who bankrupted countless businesses and defaulted loans throughout his life, bankrupting a whole empire is not a big deal at all Bulls have no fucking clue what is about to hit them

CONFIRMED: Iran strikes U.S. intelligence targets in UAE.

The Stock Market just did something it hasn't done since the Dot Com Bubble 🚨 It registered a momentum z-score above 3 and a risk appetite reading above 1 on Goldman Sachs model 🤯👀

"$187 Billion Into The Sell Vortex": Nomura's McElligott Models What The Brutal Reversal Of The Rally Will Look Like zerohedge.com/markets/187-bi…

"Another spot up vol up day... but diverging from what we've been seeing on similar moves, today's flows were heavily tilted toward hedging and monetization. We saw large SPX call spreads being unwound and puts being bought throughout the day" - GS

@VolumeLeaders SPY

Let's do some charts. Post a ticker in the comments. One ticker per customer, please.

@VolSignals What kind of “pullback” do these kind of scenarios create usually? Violent?

This isn't normal. Positioning like this USUALLY signals a pullback is imminent. Here's why >> youtube.com/watch?v=snGaCA…

This time is NEVER different

Last time we had stonks/bonds with a daily RSI at 85? December 1999

The discussion around breadth has been relevant for the last few years, but I think many people completely miss the broader point. I constantly hear breadth deterioration being used as evidence that the market is unstable or fundamentally broken, when in reality this market has been driven by a concentrated group of names for quite some time now. That is not some hidden flaw in the system. It is the structure of the current regime. Reflexively, part of this is also being amplified by the growing amount of dispersion exposure concentrated among several major players in the derivatives ecosystem. The structure itself naturally reinforces leadership concentration. At some point, people have to stop analyzing today’s market through the lens of decades-old frameworks. Arguing that weak breadth automatically signals impending instability is no different than the old-school portfolio manager complaining that stock and bond correlations are not behaving like they did in the 1980s. Markets evolve. Flows evolve. Correlations evolve. Structural dynamics evolve. If you don't evolve your process, data and infrastructure accordingly, you'll quickly get left behind.

In history of stock market, there has never been a time when 10 stocks made more than 40% of the market like they today, and the markets did not collapse by 50% shortly thereafter.

Next big move will be like "20% drop over 3 days " In a week or two, they will all say "no one could have seen this coming, no one"

@UnhedgedC 💀💀

If the Hantavirus is confirmed to have mutated to the Andes variant (human to human transmission), then my worst fears are coming true. I fear markets will overlook the risk until it’s too late, and the end result will make the 2020 crash look like an appetizer. #SPY #SPX #NQ

RT @VolumeLeaders: $AMD from the top rope. $1.8B+. #2 overall. Maybe a pause in upward price action awaits (i.e. #9). Maybe something m…