Jimbocaster

Activist: "American cattle ranching is destroying the Great Plains." Rancher: "How many bison were here in 1800?" Activist: "A lot." Rancher: "Sixty million. Same biomass as every cow in America today. Standing on the same grass." Activist: "That was different." Rancher: "How?" Activist: "It was natural." Rancher: "It was ruminants. Eating grass. Trampling it. Dunging it. The grassland built six feet of topsoil underneath them." Activist: "Then we shouldn't have killed them." Rancher: "Correct. We killed them, ploughed the prairie, and got the Dust Bowl in thirty years. Largest ecological collapse in American history." Activist: "..." Rancher: "The fix wasn't fewer animals. The fix was putting them back. The grass evolved to be eaten." Activist: "So reintroduce bison." Rancher: "Or use the 1,200-pound ruminant that's already here, in the same numbers, doing the same job, on the same grass." Activist: "It's not the same." Rancher: "It's the same animal with a different accent." Activist: "It still feels wrong." Rancher: "The thing that felt wrong was killing the bison. The cattle are how we're paying it back. Take them off and you finish the job we started in 1870."

100% false. And why I can never go back to being left. No books have been banned. Books were removed from preschool / elementary / middle school libraries - only to be placed in high school ones. The vast majority were for pornographic content. This is easily checked - The fact that this account has these many followers and promotes such lies is appalling. Nothing has ever been “banned” from sale or availability.

This is the ultimate midwit healthcare take. No, 32 countries have not “figured out” universal healthcare. The UK has “free” healthcare, and roughly 1 in 3 cancer patients in England still fail to start treatment within 62 days of urgent referral. Canada has “free” healthcare, and the median wait for neurosurgical treatment is around a year. Australia has “free” healthcare, and over half the country still buys private insurance despite paying for a public universal system with their taxes. Switzerland has universal coverage, because residents are required to buy private insurance. There is no government system where benevolent bureaucrats tuck you in at night with a warm blanket and an MRI appointment. The actual lesson from other wealthy countries is not “they figured it out.” America’s system has huge problems. Our prices are insane, insurance markets are distorted, and hospital systems are cartelized. Our regulations make care more expensive than it needs to be. Yet we still guarantee access to even the 8% who don’t have coverage. We give easy routes to qualify for medicaid for those with disabilities. Pretending the rest of the world solved healthcare because they slapped the word “universal” on a rationing scheme is not analysis. It is bumper sticker policy for people who think access means having a card in your wallet while you wait a year to see the doctor you need.

Virginia had the most democratic map in the country. It’s a 52-48 Democrat state. Dems get 6 seats and Republicans 5. The math LITERALLY maths. By any objective standard, you’d be in favor of it. Obviously the gerrymander doesn’t have anything to do with fairness. What a joke.

@robbystarbuck Did he get SPLC funding?

Before Nick rose to fame, the left used Richard Spencer as a right wing boogeyman to attack Republicans with. In a stunning coincidence, when that angle of attack stopped working, Richard backed Kamala for President. Now Nick is following the same playbook. I spy a pattern… 🤔 It’s quite a coincidence that both of these guys gave media the most offensive quotes they could dream up, which the media then wrapped around the necks of Republicans at every turn, only for both of them to support Democrats once they were no longer useful for this purpose. Strange isn’t it? If I didn’t know any better I’d almost think it was by design that they ended up in this role. For any young man who reflectively wants to defend Nick, what has he done for you? How has he used his influence to benefit your life? Because I know what I’ve done. I got the crazy trainings out of millions of workplaces. I ended DEI programs and bonuses that discriminated against you. I’m suing one of the largest companies on earth so AI can’t lie about you the way it lied about me. I stopped your woke HR lady from shoving pride down your throat. I get laws passed to make states safer and saner. And I fund pro-Christian + right wing activism. There’s much more but my point is, some of us are actually doing things to materially benefit your life. People like Nick are concerned with benefiting themselves, and they use rhetoric to relate to you so you feel like they’re on your side… but seriously, what has he done for you aside from entertaining you with some of his antics? Nothing. The man can’t lead a family, doesn’t have kids, doesn’t even seem to want a wife (sus) and he’s done nothing for the vast majority of you. Find a better man to look up to and follow.

Spencer Pratt’s LA mayor ads are incredible.

Data and analyses show that when tracking politically motivated violence based on common political views the left is responsible for nearly EVERY single incident The Methodology for this assessment was NOT based on political views endorsing violence but for violence where the motivations were underlined by common political views.

The way you know the indictment is tied to Comey's political assassination book is that the 2nd part of the indictment refers to 'proceeds' derived from the offense That he must forfeit Comey's act was an intentional incitement as part of his book launch strategy

He was releasing a novel and wanted to rile up the Left to buy it by threatening Trump

I can’t stress this enough: If you think the Comey “8647” incident is a “non-issue”, you are an idiot. If you deny Comey was making a threat, you are an idiot. A DISHONEST IDIOT. The Instagram post that immediately followed his picture of “8647” is the description of his new book, which reads as follows: “Garcia believed Buchanan went far beyond the protection of the first amendment when he singled out his enemies by name and suggested “something should be done” about them. Is that not clear enough? Comey is literally telling you what he is doing, and people are somehow pretending it’s not what he was doing! How stupid or dishonest can people possibly be? How stupid can they expect others to be? To pretend Comey was not doing exactly what he was clearly doing requires childlike ignorance, or democrat-like dishonesty. It was obvious. It was brazen. Anybody denying it is either a moron or a liar, or a combination of both. Comey should be charged and arrested.

You may not agree with blocking access to an abortion clinic, but a tally of political violence that counts those instances and not Charlie Kirk's assassination, that counts defacing an LGBT crosswalk but not entire neighborhoods in 2020, is not a data set; it's propaganda.

WATCH: @bungarsargon brings the facts about data used to claim political violence is a "both sides" issue.

Trump dressed our boys in Revolutionary Patriot garb to remind Charles what happened 250 years ago. Frame-mogging the King of England in front of the entire world. Nobody does it better. 🇺🇸

It was the police who were responsible for a vast majority of the violence on J6. It was the police who improperly launched dozens of “Stinger Ball Grenades” and gas munitions deep into a peaceful crowd without warning on the West Plaza between 1:07pm to 2:30pm - by their own admission “hitting innocent people” (see the next reply to this post). It was the police who used unlawful “deadly force” dozens of times by striking people in the heads with their batons when “deadly force” was not justified (see multiple examples in the second reply to this post). It was the police who killed Ashli Babbitt in an indefensible shooting and who likely contributed to the death of Roseanne Boyland by beating her with a stick as she was unconscious on the ground (see the third reply to this post). Most of the “violence” from protestors was in response to the extreme police brutality being exerted on innocent, non-violent people who were just exercising their first amendment rights on the West Plaza outside the Capitol and were unaware that they had entered some virtual "restricted area" due to the fences being removed long before they arrived. That the uni-party Congress, police, FBI, DOJ and legacy media have largely hidden this from the public is a disgrace - but that will change with time. Begin by removing the “protective orders” imposed on all J6 defendants that prevents them from revealing their own discovery to the country. Why is it that J6 defendants want the surveillance and body-cam videos released to the public while it is the police, Congress, FBI and DOJ who fight to keep it all concealed?

For a party that hates guns, they sure do shoot at republicans a lot…

Well done, @USATODAY. Thank you for speaking the truth. 👏👏

HOLY CRAP! Karoline Leavitt is calling out Democrats BY NAME who SPARKED the rhetoric leading to Saturday's attempt on President Trump's life 🔵 "Rep Hakeem Jeffrey just THIS MONTH said, 'we are in an era of maximum warfare everywhere all the time.'" 🔵 "Governor Josh Shapiro said heads need to roll within the administration." 🔵 "Senator Alex Padilla said people are DYING because of fear and terror caused by the Trump administration." 🔵 "Senator Elizabeth Warren: President Trump is making the country look like a 'FASCIST STATE'" 🔵 "Senator Adam Schiff saying President Trump using a dictator playbook" Senator Ed Markey calling President Trump a dictator, saying that this administration's actions are authoritarism on STEROIDS" 🔵 "Governor JB Pritzker: 'Never before in my life have I called for mass protest disruptions. These Republicans cannot know a MOMENT of peace.'" 🔵 "Rep. Pressley saying we'll see you in the streets." 🔵 Monica M McIver, a Democrat representative on Capitol Hill, we will "not take this sh*t from Donald Trump. He thinks he's a DICTATOR. We are at WAR!" "These are Democrat elected officials calling for WAR against the president of the United States and his supporters."

All three of the liberal justices dissented from the order allowing Texas to use their new congressional map. But these same justices all voted with a unanimous court back in February to allow California to use its new maps. The three liberal justices are simply progressive activists wearing black robes.

Anyone asking, suggesting or posting this kind of nonsense is not only not serious minded, they are obviously and, perhaps, irrevocably, victims of chronic intellectual immaturity. Believe it. For the Republic! Cheers. 👇

Oh, come on. The shooter left a detailed manifesto in his hotel room and sent writings to family members shortly before the attack where explicitly identified himself as the “Friendly Federal Assassin” and said was targeting Trump administration officials—prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest. There is no ambiguity. It was a politically motivated attack driven by anti-Trump and anti-Christian bile. It’s wrong to downplay or obscure the obvious motive.