Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jose
300 posts

Jose
@Jmarti581
Entrepreneur | Retired Veteran 🇺🇸 | Helping High-Performing Leaders Turn Chaos Into Clarity | Leadership & Mindset Coach
Colorado Katılım Ekim 2022
401 Takip Edilen108 Takipçiler

Only 6% of Gen Z want to reach a leadership position.
Not because they're lazy.
Because they watched what leadership actually costs and decided it
wasn't worth it.
69% see middle management as high-stress, low reward.
94% of Gen Z entrepreneurs report being happy.
That gap is a leadership failure. Not a generational one.
New video breaks down what operators need to fix and fast.
youtu.be/SpDhLKsFEGc

YouTube
English

They're not ahead of you.
They're not beside you.
They're below you grabbing ankles and calling it influence.
The moment you start moving, the opinions show up.
Good!!!!
That's how you know it's working.
Critics don't build. They watch people who do. The fact that they're focused on you means you're already ahead of them.
Stop looking down to respond.
Stop spending energy defending yourself to people who aren't even in the game.
That energy belongs to your next move.
Eyes up. Compete up. That's where the real game is.
They can't build so they critique.
Don't stop building.
Save this if you needed to hear it today.
Send to someone who's in the arena and getting heat for it.
#DontStopBuilding #OperatorMindset #NoSoftThinking #Entrepreneurship #LeadershipLessons #BuildInSilence #RebuildingStrong #MindsetMatters #EntrepreneursOfInstagram #HardTruths #TheOperatorsBrief #Discipline #ExecutionOverExcuses #JLMartinez #LevelUp #StayInYourLane #BuildersMindset #IgnoreTheNoise #CompeteUp
English

You Can't Build a Business Alone (Here's Why)
#aiautomation #innovation ... youtu.be/y85HD-GILLA?si… via @YouTube

YouTube
English

@Codie_Sanchez Im curious, what are the biggest factors you're seeing that's keeping younger people from acquiring a SMB? finances, connections, mindset, knowledge, finding prospect businesses, communication, ect....
English

You finished the week busy. You can't name what you decided.
The calendar was full of fifteen-minute approvals. A $400 PO. A Friday off. A refund for a customer you've never met. A quote $200 below the rate card.
None of those decisions needed you. All of them waited for you.
That queue is the bill most owners never see. It doesn't show up on the P&L. It shows up as jobs that ship a day late, hires that take six weeks, reports that arrive after the decision is already stale.
You've heard "delegate more." You've dismissed it, correctly, as soft advice. The reason it doesn't land is that it skips the diagnosis.
Two things hide the bottleneck from the inside:
Each approval is small. A two-minute Slack reply doesn't feel like a tax. Forty of them across a week, each one interrupting your actual work, is a different number.
The queue is asynchronous on their side and synchronous on yours. They send and move on. You receive forty and serially process between your own jobs. That's why you feel busy and they feel blocked at the same time, and both of you are right.
Before you reassign anything, measure it. For one week, log every approval that came to you. For each one, write down four things: stakes (worst-case dollar cost), reversibility (can it be undone next week), information location (who actually has the context), and frequency.
Most of the queue, on paper, will be high-frequency, low-stakes, reversible, and held by someone other than you. That's the territory that shouldn't have been in your inbox.
Then reassign the authority, not just the task. "Approve refunds up to $250 against the published policy; escalate anything else" is a transfer. "Handle refunds" is a hand-off that bounces back to your desk by Thursday.
This week: pull last week's messages, texts, and approval app. Count the decisions that came to you. Circle every one under $500 and undoable. That's the floor of what shouldn't have been on your desk.
Next week, count again. The number should drop.
Full breakdown, including the four-question audit and how to use RAPID to reassign the D: blog.tsmethods.com/the-approval-q…
#SmallBusinessOps #Operators #Delegation #DecisionMaking #OwnerOperator
English

You spend forty minutes editing every AI draft. Rewriting tone, cutting filler, adding the one example that makes it sound like you.
The tool didn't fail. The instructions did.
Most creators are past the access question. Adobe's 2025 survey puts generative-AI adoption among creators at 86%. The interesting number isn't who's using it. It's what they get back when they do.
A model fills in whatever you don't specify with the average of its training data. Ask for "a LinkedIn post about AI workflows" and you'll get the median LinkedIn post about AI workflows. Three-sentence hook, numbered list, vague close. The output isn't bad. It's just not yours.
Look at the edits you make. They're almost always the same categories: tone, specificity, structure, and cutting the parts that sound like AI. Those edits are the spec you forgot to write down. You're doing it after the fact, by hand, every time.
The fix is a structured brief. Six fields, written once, reused every week:
-Audience -> who's reading and what they already know.
-Angle -> the one sentence that says what this piece argues. Not the topic. The take.
-Voice constraints -> two or three rules. Short sentences. No hype words. Your banned-word list.
-Structure -> name your house structure so the model stops inventing one.
-Examples -> one or two paragraphs of your own work that hit. The model pattern-matches on cadence in a way no adjective list can replicate.
-What to avoid -> the failure modes. The openers and closers you never use.
The first time you build it takes an hour. Every prompt after is a paragraph of variables dropped into a system that already knows how you sound.
The forty minutes of editing doesn't go to zero. It goes to ten. And the ten minutes you keep are the part only you can do.
Pick the channel where you spend the most editing time. Open the last three pieces you published there. Write down what they have in common; audience, angle pattern, sentence length, what you never do. That document is your first brief. Use it on the next piece you draft.
blog.tsmethods.com/ghost/#/editor…
#ContentCreator #AITools
English

Anthropic just shipped scheduled agents, multi-agent orchestration, and persistent memory.
Most SMBs will try to use it on processes that aren't written down yet. Faster chaos isn't a solution.
Define the work first. Then automate it.
lennysnewsletter.com/p/code-with-cl…
English

I've sat across from business owners who spent six months learning AI and automated themselves into the exact same problems they had before.
They didn't have a knowledge problem. They had a sequencing problem.
You cannot automate your way out of something you haven't diagnosed. You'll just get to the wrong destination faster.
Before you learn the tool, know which wound you're trying to close.
smallbiztrends.com/google-revives…
English

Pick the channel where you edit the most. Pull your last three posts there. Write down what they have in common' audience, angle, sentence length, what you never do. That's your first brief. Full walkthrough: blog.tsmethods.com/you-gave-the-m…
English

Full breakdown; the diagnostic, the 3-touch cadence, and the math at under a cent per SMS: blog.tsmethods.com/your-no-show-r…
English

