John Anderson

Today we remember the power of Narrative. The communists used Narrative to leverage the overdose of a violent career criminal into a worldwide accumulation of wealth and power. A lot of people on the right failed the test of that moment. Never accept the left’s Narratives.

@CalebCantu69327 @JosiahHawthorne The full saying is “the exception proves the rule in cases not excepted”. A sign that says no parking on Thursdays is an exception that proves the rule that parking is allowed any other day but not Thursday. A counter example is not an exception.

@JosiahHawthorne Pointing out an exception proves the rule.

I hope someone in the SBC will have the consistency to make a motion to strike the name "Lottie Moon" from any and all official SBC organizations and offerings. You know, since women instructing men in theological matters is "acting in the office of a pastor" and thus anathema.

To understand this, you have to realize something. Iryna wasn't Charlie Kirk. She wasn't a political pundit or controversial. She was simply a young White woman coming home from work. The reason that these are getting vandalized is because they hate White people and like when we get killed. They just want to murder White people. It's that simple

White people became aware that they are the real minority and argued for their protected status on that basis. (Assuming they'd be entitled for the same protections afforded the browns.) The genociders instead pivoted to affirming the browns’ hegemony based on their “global majority” status. So now you see it’s only ever been about one thing: they hate White people and they want you to die. You cannot appeal to their arguments or their empathy for your right to exist. Those aren’t for you. You will only earn the right to your own life and nation at the tip of a sword.

@YahwehGraced @superhiloman @TheMuppetPastor The grammar doesn’t allow your syntax. “teaching” is still a directive to the disciples not to the Holy Spirit. Nor does the text say “and the Holy Spirit will teach them to obey” The trinity is definitely a doctrine that is derived from the text.

@YahwehGraced @superhiloman @TheMuppetPastor You cant lie to a description either. Ananias lied to that “tall tree” in Acts 5:3-4 which Peter then identified as lying to God The father and son dont have the same name. And as you pointed out, Jesus doesn’t say “names”

Dear Protestants, Trinity is a Catholic tradition, not found in the Bible In fact it is one of their main talking point against Sola Scriptura If you claim Sola Scriptura, you must reject that doctrine Comment below if you have any questions or doubts regarding this Happy to help

The land under these panels will never be farmed again. Potato growing associations nationwide will not buy potatoes grown on ex-solar sites. Why? The panels leach heavy metals, as well as drop glass shards and microplastics onto the soil below them. In a mass commercial arrangement, vegetation below the panels is soaked in herbicides. The fertile farmland is gone forever.

@YahwehGraced @superhiloman @TheMuppetPastor What is your alternate interpretation of Mt 28:19? Your “either” statement is a false dichotomy and not a necessary conclusion.

@superhiloman @TheMuppetPastor Thank for the reply brother You say Mat 28:19 is pretty explicit, but in whose name did the Apostles baptize in the book of Acts? Either Apostles deliberately disobeyed, or trinitarian interpretation of Mt 28:19 is wrong

@theprofsrecord @Lukewearechange @MassieforKY Agreed. Do you think the machines and that soft power coup are what took Massie out?

@Lukewearechange @MassieforKY Being silent during the 2020 soft power coup of Trump disqualified Massie. That was the only political needle that required moving, and he did nothing.

For all the people celebrating @MassieforKY defeat You guys realize that by getting rid of Thomas, you don’t push the political needle at all. This whole fight was pointless. It’s not going to make any political impact at all. The midterms are coming. The Democrats are set to take control, Massie is gonna be in Congress for the next seven months and he’s definitely not going to be playing ball with you now, it won’t matter who’s in that seat because Congress will be in the Democrats hands anyway. Why celebrate a victory that only reinforces belief in many people that the swamp is in charge and only wants to punish people for not fully complying with some of the most unpopular policies? Politically speaking, this whole fight should’ve been avoided as it only furthers the divide in the right!

@CherylSchatz You never followed up with your conclusions on this. I’m curious what you were getting at?

Here is a couple of interesting questions about the rich young ruler and his question to Jesus. I will be presenting the account picking up the parallel accounts in Matthew, Mark, and Luke: As He was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to Him and knelt before Him, and asked Him, (Mark 10:17) “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” (Luke 18:18) Jesus said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17) Then he said to Him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not commit murder (1); You shall not commit adultery (2); You shall not steal (3); You shall not bear false witness (4); Honor your father and mother (5); and You shall love your neighbor as yourself (6).”(Matthew 19:18-19) And he said to Him, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.” Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” (Mark 10:20-21) Jesus then said to him, “If you wish to be complete (or perfect), go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.” (Luke:18-22) Here are the questions: 1) Jesus gave a list of commands that that the young man needed to keep to enter into life. What do you notice about the specific commands that Jesus gave to him? 2) What commands did Jesus leave out? 3) What is the ONE thing according to Jesus that the rich young ruler lacked in order to be complete? I will give my answers later, but I want to see what you all see in the combined accounts of the rich young ruler.

To remind everyone what really happened that night: • They cut off testicles and shoved them into the victims's mouths. • They stabbed pregnant women in the womb and raped them. • They beheaded people. • They gouged people's eyes out. French authorities worked overtime to keep these details away from the public. And apparently, the mastermind behind this atrocity will soon walk, because European leaders are cowards and traitors who will never do the right thing.

Jewish/Israeli groups may openly cheer and boast that their money defeated a congressman, but YOU may not joke about it, because then you are an anti-Semite. The policemen of thought and speech hated the beginning of Thomas Massie's concession speech. He began by apologizing for being a little late: he had been trying to reach his opponent to concede the race but it was hard tracking him down in Tel Aviv. Now if Chinese or Russian interests had poured tens of millions into someone's campaign, the very same people complaining about Massie would consider it a moral imperative to mock that money. Well, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, as they say. I've seen so many influencers on X claiming that Massie lost because he wasn't a team player, didn't vote for the One Big Beautiful Bill, etc., and that it had nothing at all to do with the tens of millions from a foreign interest. (Then why did those people spend the tens of millions?) But Marjorie Taylor Greene did vote for the OBBB, and that didn't save her. Meanwhile, Mike Lawler, who is a disaster on Trump's signature issue, immigration, had Trump out campaigning for him! So no, I don't believe that nonsense because it doesn't fit reality. John Podhoretz openly boasted that "Jewish money" defeated Massie. "We have to use what means there are at our disposal, and…that is Jewish money!" Ha'aretz just reported that "pro-Israel spending" indeed "achieved its goal in Kentucky." AIPAC boasted that it filled Massie and Greene's seats with complaint congressmen. Video from the "Ed Gallrein" victory party showed about two dozen people there. Yeah, this whole thing sure was an organic and spontaneous expression of the will of the people! Since it's now obvious to everyone that a foreign country has veto power over who may represent us, I think we losers should at least be allowed to joke about it, as a consolation. Surely our overlords can deign to permit us at least that much. David Stockman, Ronald Reagan's director of the Office of Management and Budget, was even blunter than ol' Woods: "In a peaceful, non-interventionist Republic, foreign countries would not spend tens of millions in one-off Congressional races because there would be no policy favors, fiscal lucre and military aids to lobby for. And AIPAC would not even exist, let alone be bragging about replacing the two greatest advocates of peace and liberty in the US Congress with two paid lackeys with their noses up the place in Bibi's anatomy where the sun don't shine. Bring the Empire Home. All of it."

@theprofsrecord Hi Prof, do you think the machines/mail in votes had anything to do with this loss? Essentially, what is the metric for trusting/being glad for the results of an election?

Thomas Massie had a good voting record, or so I’m told. Except for his silence on the rigged and stolen 2020 election, his silence over the soft power coup against Trump that exposed us to a globalist death spiral, his selective outrage about the Epstein files (which vindicated Trump), and his endorsement of Ron DeSantis over the real President —- you know, the one the bad guys keep trying to kill…. If you look past those things, I can see why you are upset about tonight’s loss. And if you looked past those things, you are also a moron.

Folks are quite good at sensing when something in a building feels off, but struggle to name the why. Stone veneer is a classic example of rarely achieving the look of the real. Let's talk about one of the main reasons it fails to convince. Let's talk about the "Patio Problem".

How do you type this out and not feel the weight of unbearable shame crushing your organs

If America were a creedal nation, then America would regularly be denaturalizing and deporting anyone who rejects the creed, either in word or deed. But that never happens, so you know this is just empty rhetoric. The Founders clearly stated that America exists to secure the blessings of liberty for us and our posterity. There’s nothing in any founding documents about America being created to support anyone who mouths a creed at naturalization while crossing their fingers behind their backs.

Execute him tomorrow morning. We don’t need 20 years of taxpayer-funded appeals.

This needs to be expedited. No more 20 years on death row. No more 300 appeals. This sentence needs to be carried out immediately because every day, it's an insult to that poor little angel he killed.

Running the math on this is insane. Here’s the math, slightly adjusted for my wife and me, who were married at 26 instead of 25 but this is roughly accurate. We spend $0 most years on healthcare because we eat well and exercise. Here’s a real-world case study: • Started at age 25 paying $1,000/month in premiums • By age 30 it was $2,000/month • Today at age 38–39 (with 4 kids) it’s $4,000/month That’s roughly 10% annual growth in premiums over 13+ years. The Alternative Plan (“Forced Savings”): • Invest the full premium amount every year in the S&P 500 at 6% • Keep actual healthcare spending very low: $1,000/year base (inflating 4%) + 4 home births at $6k each • From age 45 onward: Take a 2% annual distribution to cover healthcare + living expenses The Results: • Age 39 (today): $464,000 • Age 45: $1.07 million • Age 55: $3.17 million • Age 65: $7.97 million At 65 the 2% distribution would be ~$160,000 per year — and growing. This family would have a nearly $8 million nest egg while still covering real medical needs through low utilization + smart investing. For the record the 6% number is the most important. I used the historical rate, but what if we’d used the actual rate? Using Actual 13.87% S&P 500 Return (Past Period) • Age 25 to 39 (your real 14-year timeline): Monthly investments into the actual S&P 500 at 13.87% annualized total return (with dividends reinvested) while premiums grew at your observed 10% rate would have built the account to approximately $880,000 – $950,000 today (after low medical costs and the 4 home births). • Future projection (age 39 to 65) at conservative 6% annual return: • Age 45: ~$1.8 million • Age 55: ~$5.5 million • Age 65: ~$14.2 million • At age 65 the 2% annual distribution would be approximately $284,000 per year.