
❌ABBY’S DADDY❌(2009-19)❌
5K posts

❌ABBY’S DADDY❌(2009-19)❌
@JohnGLovesLife
Huge fan/friend of “My Beloved Brother” @BeatlesPeteBest @PACKERS #1 FAN! 2X-Owner #ProLife *PROUD INFIDEL* 💯% #MAGA! *This Catholic Supports #Jews!*






The Pope says “Christians and Muslims can live together and be friends” What is your response to him ??







The Good News is that Pope Leo Condemns ‘Terrorist Attacks’ But he doesn’t identify those who carried them out. And there’s a reason why he didn’t. Jihadis carried out murderous attacks in Chad and Mali recently, and Pope Leo XIV took notice seeming to sound all the right notes. Yet one glaring omission in his remarks showed up the futility and wrongheadedness of a foremost practice of the contemporary Roman Catholic Church. Japan Times reported Sunday that the pontiff said: “I have learned with concern of the reports of increasing violence in the Sahel region, particularly in Chad and Mali, which have been hit by recent terrorist attacks.” He added: “I offer my prayers for the victims and express my solidarity with all those who are suffering. I hope that all forms of violence will cease, and I encourage every effort toward peace and development in that beloved land.” Japan Times provided the background: “On Saturday, security sources said dozens of people in central Mali had been killed the day before by the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims, an Al-Qaida-linked group…. In Chad, the jihadi group Boko Haram killed at least 26 army personnel last week.” It was the news outlet, not the pope of Rome, who identified the Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims and “the jihadi group Boko Haram” as the perpetrators of these attacks. But why was the pope so reticent? Why couldn’t he stand with the Christians of Chad and Mali and identify the Islamic jihadis who have been brutalizing them? The reason is because he doesn’t want to harm the dialogue that has been going on for years between Muslims and Roman Catholics. It is to avoid harming that dialogue that Christian spokesmen from numerous faith traditions have stopped talking about the Muslim persecution of Christians, if they ever spoke about it at all, and haven’t started talking about it if they had the opportunity to do so. The idea that speaking forthrightly about Muslim persecution of Christians could hurt the Muslim/Christian “dialogue” dialogue, and so the suffering Christians must simply be sacrificed on the altar of glad-handing and small talk goes back years. Robert McManus, who was then and still is the Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, Massachusetts, said it on February 8, 2013 as he was suppressing a planned talk (by me) at a Roman Catholic conference on that persecution: “Talk about extreme, militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally might undercut the positive achievements that we Catholics have attained in our inter-religious dialogue with devout Muslims.” There it is. What McManus articulated thirteen years ago appears to be the policy of his current boss (as well as that of Pope Leo’s predecessor, Pope Francis). The pope doesn’t want to identify any Islamic teaching as being responsible for violence, despite the fact that such violence was perpetrated in the name of Islam and in accord with its teachings. He doesn’t want to take any official notice of the fact that the perpetrators were Muslims and the victims Christians, and that the attackers had core elements of Islamic theology as their primary motivation, because what would that do to the prospects of Muslims and Christians becoming friends? All those expensive conferences cannot be shown up as a total waste of time and money, now, can they?



Barack Hussein Obama wiretapping Trump Tower during the 2016 election was a million times worse than anything Nixon did during Watergate. It is time to arrest the Renegade.

Islamists are mass slaughtering civilians in the Congo. Where is the outrage?



Who would you save and why? 🤔 I know this is a tough one but ya gotta pick one.😏












